Henry's handball against Ireland, Liverpool goal given offside against spurs when VAR failed, the "ghost goal" given by Stuart Atwell, the final whistle being blown as Brazil scored against Argentina in 1974... to name but a few others!
It was actually in the 1978 world cup, and against sweden, not argentina. The referee blew the whistle to end the game halfway through a corner kick just before zico scored a goal. It could have changed the world cup because it made Brazil classify in second place at the group, which led it into a group with Argentina (which was also accused of bribing the peruvian team in the last match of second group stage, as Brazil was eliminated on goal difference after a suspicious argentinian victory of 6-0 against Peru) @@dj71162
Korea had another bent referee in their game with Portugal as well, 2 players were sent off, and the final whistle was blown, before the end, just as Portugal was about to score.
I love how Simunic got a second yellow but he notices the referee's mistake, since he wasn't given a red, he's not out... then he goes and gets the third yellow :D
that's true. they differ almost 20 centimeters in height. and it's also a huge advantage that goalies are allowed to use their hands, but wait a second..... 😅
That 2010 goal by Lampard that got disallowed was the pinnacle of robbery . I watched that match and clearly saw the goalkeeper reach over the line and snatch the ball . Everyone watching saw it.
Get along with it. I don't think i need to remind you of Wembley'66.....I call it justice. You cant blame the Referees for Not seeing Lampards ball in as they only saw it from a considerable distance. Bad Angle. Can happen.
@@martenspitzner408I got it but it’s so sad and neuer not being honest, I get he wants to win but it’s just unfair and almost kind of rude. I get the ref couldn’t see but it’s still sad and annoying.
In both Matches the winning team led with more than one point at the end, so i think its still fair to say that England won in 66 and Germany in 2010. Now, the motivational aspect and how the game would have really played out, nobody knows.
In the Liverpool-Chelsea game, the goalkeeper would have been sent off had the goal; not been allowed, leaving Chelsea to play most of the game with only ten men, making a Liverpool win just about inevitable.
Indeed. People seem to forget the "ghost goal" happened in the 4th minute. If a foul had been given instead Chelsea would have been playing a man down, likely a goal down, without their first choice keeper, at Anfield for 86 minutes plus stoppage time. That the goal was given inarguably helped Chelsea more than Liverpool.
You are missing the sent off to Rudi Völler in the 1990 WC match Germany vs Netherlands. The Argentine referee Loustau never explained his descision and overlooked Rikjard's spatting and hair pulling. This was one of the most unjust decisions in FIFA history.
POR FAVOR vean el video. PLEASE watch the video. Usa los SUBTITULOS en el video de RU-vid para ver otros lenguajes. CRISTO JESÚS es el CAMINO, la VERDAD, y la VIDA. Tengan FE en CRISTO JESÚS. Use the SUBTITLES in the a RU-vid video to see other languages. JESUS CHRIST is the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIFE. Have FAITH in JESUS CHRIST.
they can't include that as it was to Germany's detriment and their bias wouldn't allow having more of those. They just about couldn't leave Wembley out (but note how they actually claim 2010 is somehow worse than the mistake in the 1966 final).
That "comeback" against PSG is as bad as this one. People don't talk about it as much as the Chelsea one because the media covered it and only focused on the "comeback".
@@tuongminhhh oh, so bad? lets sum it up then Barca vs Chelsea 2009, no one talking about how Chelsea robbed Barca in the first leg, just saying Ballack and Drogba shouldve been send off and shouldnt even play in the 2nd leg. Still remember Ballack running to the ref, even tho blud literally blocked the ball with his hand inside the box a game earlier 💀 Barca vs PSG had one bad pen call, so what? Madrid had plenty of calls in their favour, but nobody wants to talk about that
@@ippoipper6391 Not to mention Anelka's dive resulting in Abida's red card. Barcelona was clearly the most robbed side in both legs overall. In 2017 to be fair there were two bad calls, the obvious was the penalty on Suarez which was not and also the penalty that was not given to Di Maria. However Barca didn't won anything in that season as we were eliminated in the very next round. The difference is that the decisions going against us cost us titles like 2010 against Inter
Hey the handball thing happened again yesterday when Saka controlled the ball with his hand twice, passed to Kane, who kicked a defender and got a penalty for it.
As a Mexican, Messi's first goal in 2010 an obscene offside for the 1-0 . he was the last player there wasnt a gk or a defender between him and the goal at the time of the pass, and in 2014 Robben simulation for a penalty for netherlands. #noerapenal
In 2006 Messi had a goal mistakenly disallowed against the mexican crybabies, and in 2010 it was Tévez who scored with a Messi assist. Deserved for robbing the greatest of all time from his first World Cup KO goal, you guys made him have to wait until 2022; he also knocked you out last time so he got a double revenge.
As someone who had just started following the sport, that Lampard one was tough to understand. Even still I think that nobody actually wants to play the sport since they would rather a game end as fast as possible than actually make the correct calls
The German GoalKeeper is the most disgusting one who hit the French player in purpose and got no punishment at all and His team finally won with shame.
They lost the final to Italy, 3-1. This wasn't the first time in the tournament Germany infuriated the world. In the group stage in Gijon They staged a 1-0 win over Austria that allowed both teams to advance
He DID get punished. Twice. Firstly by Rossi, Altobelli, and Tardelli. Secondly by Brown, Valdano, and Burruchaga. Not to mention being blown out by his fellow countryman, Sepp Piontek's, dynamites in the group stage.
The ref decision that still unnerves me is the yellow card for Thomas Müller during Germany vs Argentinia at WC 2010. In the 35th minute, Lionel Messi demanded a booking for Thomas Müller for handball despite having done the exact same thing litterally a second earlier. Müller was disqualified from the encounter with Spain, and Germany lost 0-1. It was all the more annoying because almost a very similiar thing had happened four years earlier when crazy Argentinians after their defeat started to punch the German players and Torsten Frings, a key player, got disqualified subsequently for the semifinal with Italy.
The offside mistake by the assistant referee during the Bayern Munich - Real Madrid Champions League semi-final game PAST extra-time in the Champions League and VAR being literally shut off, thus not validating the goal, was something incredibly bizarre to watch.
People talk obsessively about Korea 2002, or other matches that were detramental to big european teams. But the biggest robbery I've ever seen was Netherlands-Uruguay 2010. 14 "mistakes" favouring the Netherlands against 1 favouring Uruguay. That and that bloodboiling shot of the referee literally laughing at Cavani's face as he complains, Van Bommel snapping legs like a butcher, etc. It's crazy how nobody seems to remember that.
Still will never understand that complaint lol. Yes the Netherlands got like 3 their way and probably a few other 50/50s. But not compared to Chelsea vs Barca or any on this list. No hate but there’s always been an agenda against the Netherlands, always.
@@exceler9369 No particular agenda here. Cruyff and Van Basten are both in my top 6 favourite players ever. I respect the national team (except Van Bommel, jesus), and I feel as though they deserved at least one world cup. This is an isolated event I speak of, and yes as a uruguayan it hurts a lot particularly because I thought we played better that game, and because all three goals were post and ins. I´ve watched the match at least five times in its entirety since 2010, and I sincerely believe it cannot be a coincidence. And since you brought up the Chelsea v Barcelona from 08/09, I dpn´t think that was nearly as much of a robbery as people recall. I rewatched that game about a year ago (when the Negreira scandal happened), precisely to try to determine if it truly was so obscene, and I think not nearly. From all the supposed penalties people think should have been, the only one where I would say it´s a penalty is Piqué´s handball. Mayyybe that last one, but the guy is with his back turned and the ball hits basically his armpit. Honestly handballs are plenty confusing, but from what I´ve heard it´s starting from where the shirt ends. And the ball bounces straight from his sleeve. And on the other hand there was the ridiculous red card to Abidal which clearly should never have been. So maybe favoured Barcelona but I wouldn´t nearly call it a robbery of the scale that is generally portrayed.
@@AndresMagnone but you’re completely ignoring the original idea, it doesnt matter if you play better (which you didn’t imo) it matters if you scored the goals. Also just because you like someone doesn’t mean it’s ok to make stupid remarks about the team. The foul was in the box and no going against that. The way the ball hit his “armpit” was illegal. The arm hits the ball completely, it may not look like it because of how it hit but if you were playing in that moment and you handballed it like that you would know what I mean. I would love to believe that the ref was just having a bad day but those calls were just horrendous. No hate mate just different opinions have a nice day!
Korea 2002 was special. It wasn't just the Italian game. It started in the 2nd half of the Portugal vs Korea qualifying match and continued. Everyone one talkes about the Italy match, but I think the next game against Spain was even worse.
You do realize they shouldn’t have even been there to begin with given what Suarez did in the previous match against Ghana right lol, they literally couldn’t be in any less of a position to complain.
Before VAR, the problem of football was that when a shot from distance just barely crossed the line, it's very difficult to detect. The linesman was not close to the goal line. Viewing it from an angle, it's almost impossible to tell whether the ball had crossed the line. In other words, Lampard's goal is not the only injustice. Check out Pedro Mendes' "no goal" for Tottenham vs Man United in the 2004-05 Premier League ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mpwoe07CFGw.html Garrincha's "no goal" for Brasil vs France in 1958 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CMO7_qXT4so.html I am sure there are a lot more. If a shot from the distance does not hit the back of the net, it then depends on your luck whether it will be counted as a goal. It's an intrinsic flaw of football due to the positioning of the linesmen. They have to be way out to watch for offside.
I watched Lampard's goal at a pub in England. I felt really really sorry for the country because they've been struggling for decades (even to this day 14 years after) to assert themselves as a top footballing nation and a former champion nonetheless, much like Uruguay who continues to do that even though it's been 74 years since they last actually won the world cup
"That would prevent such situations from happening again". Riiiiiight. 🤣 Of course, in theory that's the case, but in practice it has been misused, not used, or had errors. It's definitely a benefit over all but it's far from flawless.
you know back then, when Germany played against Spain in the EURO 2024 and didn't get the penalty after the spanish player (not keeper) saved a shot with his full hand and they lost afterwards?
It's coz his hand was both to his side and behind his torso, moving in and backwards. By FIFA rules, that's not a handball, that's the ball being kicked _into_ your hand. A penalty is only awarded if the handball is intentional, or the player's movement wasn't suitable to the situation, resulting in an avoidable accidental handball. I think it was the fact that he was moving his hands to behind his back when his wrist got hit that made them determine his movement to be suitable. Since the "suitable" thing to do with your hands is put them behind your back in that situation. Doesn't matter all that much for two reasons though: the player who passed to him played offside just seconds before so a goal that came of it wouldn't have counted anyway, and the shot was off target. Still, gutting result.
@@vexedlex8230 He jumped in front of the ball and put his hands behind his back afterwards when it was to late as it already blocked a ball. If it was offside the ref/VAR should say so and don't let them play on as they have to do a free kick afterwards
@@quenking2241 It's true he put his hands behind his back after he leapt in, but we've got to be careful to avoid the trap of thinking he was playing in the slo mo replay we were watching. In real time, he reacted about as fast as a person could. As for what the ref shoulda done, sure, shoulda been a free for Spain but that's a mistake in Germany's favour and Spain ended up winning the match so I doubt they're too broken up over a missed call that didn't lead to a concession. Had the ball gone under his arm and curved in, the Spanish would likely be irate.
Yea, your point? That was the right call. His arm wasn’t stretched out. What was he supposed to do, cut off his arm before or during the match? Spain very clearly deserved their euro cup win as they were the strongest team in the tournament. Anyone that thinks that should have been a penalty clearly does not know the rules of the sport. Then again, they did give that absurd penalty to England against the Netherlands… And as the person above me pointed out, that situation shouldn’t have even taken place to begin with as there should’ve been a free kick for Spain beforehand.
Roy Carroll in goal for Man U. The ball was a good two yards over the line and wasn’t given. And VAR had just made it all worse, not prevented it happening again
The linesman on the 2010 game between England and Germany is easily the worst in history. Everyone can see it's a goal, but some people choose not to see.
To this day I still remember that shot vs Germany from Lampard (I am German btw) and I was saying to my uncle, can’t they just review the footage and say it is a goal? He said: no that would be stupid. ^^
Brazil against Belgium 2002. Wilmot's goal against Brazil was a legit goal but you can see it was a very corrupt year for the world cup and Belgium just wasn't allowed to win against Brazil.
You could have mentioned the guy slidetackling his opponents leg open full length, to a point you could see the entire bone and only getting a yellow card^^
The thing is yes he did get the ball but he barely touched it and it was very reckless and dirty tackle. Also he prevented a huge goal scoring oppurtunity would result to a penalty
So sick of the talk on the first one. Not only was it a penalty to Liverpool but it was a straight red card. There's no valid argument against that. So, let's stop going on about it. A penalty almost certainly goes in and Chelsea have to play the majority of the game at Anfield with 10 men. Ya, I'd have taken that NP.
"he will always be remembered as the guy who gave 3 yellow cards" - as someone who went to Goodison derby in 2000 and seen him disallow Everton's 91st minute winner by Don Hutchinson (only as he explained after the match coz the time was up) I might disagree. The fact that he apologised to Everton fans years later wouldn't change the fact that he was alway dodgy to say the least...
You forgot the Peru- Brazil match in Copa America 2016. Peruvian player Raul Ruidiaz scored with his hand, Peru won the match and eliminated Brazil for the first time in history from the group stage. The referee took 18 minutes to decide it was a goal. Then the VAR was born.
The thing with the Liverpool ghost goal was if it wasn't a goal it was a penalty, if it was a penalty it was a red card for Cech and if it was a red card Chelsea would have had to use a sub to bring on a keeper in the 3rd minute of the game. So Chelsea fans pick your poison; 1. Go 1-0 down 2. Have a 70% chance of going 1-0 down from a penalty and be down to 10 men and 2 subs for the remaining 87 minutes plus stoppage time at Anfield in a European game.
I don't think you can count that or the 1966 Geoff Hurst goal as being terrible mistakes, as they weren't that easy to see. As a liverpool fan, I've always thought Chelsea were a bunch of cry babies over it.
Like Jose said if you're not sure don't give it !! It was never proved it crossed the line The Liverpool crowd made the shit referee's mind up So what your saying is a load of bollocks really
England fans all over the world were going absolutely batshit when that Lampard goal was disallowed. Especially because it happened against the Germans and they knocked us out because of it.
@ 11:04 - Looking at it from this angle, it's quite clear to me that the ball didn't cross, not even close. As an Englishman I can finally admit after 50 years that we were incredibly lucky to have won the World Cup in 1966 but hey, I'll take it 😆👍
11:36 The 1966 final would not have gone to penalties.... they were not introduced to World Cup football until 1982. The game would have been replayed.
The penalty was not introduced in 1982. It was introduced in 1978 but wasn't used. There were only two KO games in 1978, the 3rd place match and the final. The penalty shootout wasn't needed in either game. Very few people on the Internet knows how to resolve a draw game before 1976 (the final of Euro 76 was decided by penalty, the Panenka chip). On the Internet, you would never find the fixture list of the tournament. Fixture list can only be found on printed newspaper before the actual tournament. In the World Cup, the final would be replayed. For oldies like me, I saw the 1974 fixture list have a game scheduled on Tuesday for the final replay. And what about the final replay that still ended in a draw? or a round before the final? The winner would be decided by a coin toss. It was used in a major tournament only once, the semi-final of Euro 68, between Italy and USSR.
The Frank Lampard goal bounced that way due to the unusual shape and design of the Jabulani (the official ball used at the 2010 World Cup). Very unlucky although it probably wouldn’t have changed the winner of the match
1966 was awfull, not only the final. Pelé got ouy with an injury against Portugal, amazing the amount of harsh fouls one after another. the semifinals Uruguay vs Germany had an english refery, and Argentina vs England had a german referi. the hole thing was a charade.
Even though the Gerard goal didn’t count, it’s almost impossible for an official to see that ball go over the line. Without Var, it would just be a guess
VAR just slows down the mistakes there have been too many VAR errors in the 23\24 season alone not mentioning all the mistakes since it was bought into the PL to say that it has cut referee errors it is probably caused more mistakes that refs ever had
A factual error about the 1966 World Cup Final: in those days, there were no penalty shoot-outs. Had the scores still been level after 120 minutes, there would have been a replay a few days later. Back then, we continued to have replays until a victor emerged, no matter how many games it took. Occasionally, a tie was decided on the toss of a coin. Although I dislike penalty shoot-outs, they are infinitely more satisfactory than a coin toss.
As an England fan the Lampard goal, it did hurt, but its not like it was the final, 😉so the Gerry's were due, but as a West Ham fan I pissed myself laughing at fatboy's incredulous expression! 🤣
