Wrongly Dividing the Word of Truth: A Book Review 

If you can find a copy, I would highly recommend Ironside's History of the Plymouth Brethren. Thanks always for your insight.

Hey brother, I have a quick question regarding your warning of those teachers which say sections or books of the NT are "not to the body of Christ" in this dispensation. Rev. Clarence Larkin (the Baptist Classical Dispensationalist, infamous for his classic work "Dispensational Truth") wrote concerning the epistles of James & Hebrews: "When we take the Old Testament promises and apply them to the Church we rob the Jew of that which is exclusively his. For illustration, the prophecy of Isaiah is largely applied to the Church, whereas the very first verse declares that it is-"Concerning JUDAH and JERUSALEM." Isa. 1:1. In the New Testament the Epistles of Hebrews and James are Jewish. The Epistle of James is addressed, not to the Church, but to the "TWELVE TRIBES scattered abroad." James 1:1. Therefore the "Prayer of Faith" (James 5:13-16) for the sick is not primarily a promise to the Church but to Israel, though doubtless it will be answered for all who comply with the conditions. In the Epistle to the Hebrews many Christians stumble at the words "fall away" (Heb. 6:4-6), and "if we sin wilfully." Heb. 10:26. But these words do not apply to Christians." (Dispensational Truth, Chapter 5. www.blueletterbible.org/study/larkin/dt/05.cfm) Charles Ryrie held that the Sermon on the Mount (Matt . 5-7) is not doctrinally speaking to the body of Christ of this dispensation, of course Scofield, Lewis Chafer, and Charles Baker held the same. Should we watch out for and stay away from these teachers? Are such positions automatically disqualifying of one being a valid dispensational theologian?

Finland is waiting "Book of the Year -22" review 😂😂

I like your work. But I think on this one you missed it because you don’t know Bullinger’s teaching. You, like Ironside, argued against a straw man.

IMO there is little difference between the hyper- and ultra- dispensationalists. Both deny that the church began on Pentecost in Acts 2. I'm not sure how strongly Grace Bible College in Grand Rapids holds to this view, but they were founded by Charles F. Baker who was a hyper/ultra dispensationalist. Also, Les Feldick is a proponent of something like this but doesn't come out and explicitly say so. And as you noted, there is more to defining this position other than when the church was founded. One slight disagreement with a point in your review-- I think I heard you say that the reoffer of the kingdom to Israel was a characteristic of hyper/ultra disp. That may be true, but it is also held by many traditional dispensationalists. Andy Woods' 9 objections to this (you reviewed his book I think) fail to prove that the kingdom was not offered. In Acts 3 Peter clearly uses kingdom-offer language with the qualification 'whom heaven must receive until the times...." (Maybe I should have commented on the review of Woods' book.) Good job. You're a reading machine.