xQc Reacts to 'How 9/11 was used to Sell a War' by Johnny Harris 

starting any war by itself is already the antonym of "saving"

Imagine believing Iraq was a peaceful country before the U.S. invaded 💀

@@rapid9534 no one said they were peaceful?

Iraq was absolutely fine before colonisers and invaders. Ignore the Kuwait invasion, life for Iraqis was good for thousands of years

@@rapid9534for the residents it was.

Who cares what people remember. Not like they play any role in the decision making process on that level.

​@@JustChill-zd4ibthat's right. We are all NPCs at the end of the day.

You literally remind us that America bad and evil every single day lol

911 was only american thing everyone else doesnt care about it

history is doomed to repeat over and over

Surely they wouldn't fall for lies, right

@@kassy5634 Surely the people who always virtue signaled about being against war won't fall for the lies leading us to war in Ukraine.

You're the one that falls for a lie buddy. You're the type of person to think the world is flat. You're literally defending terrorists, probably because they make you feel all fuzzy and warm inside

this is all one big lie, xcc is a psyop to make you go against the government by providing false information for you to eat up.

This is the saddest part of all

he never fails to say things that make me lose braincells

oh really? 'cause any analogy I hear from him is nonsense, and makes me wonder how people can get so rich by being so stupid.

@@GlassEater420 he's being sarcastic 🤓

@@GlassEater420 skill issue

yeah chocolate and steel have the same melting point lol

what does that matter if you die poor

@@melinagoranson🐳🐳🐳🐳

​@@melinagoranson 🐳🐳🐳🐳

​@@melinagoransonsez the parasocial schizo pretending to be adept

Imagine being broke and calling some broke

that softeninged my intellect

Using Cringe is Cringe LULE

He's not wrong...

He's referencing the malleability of steel. Look into, learn some things

@@Justin-ee1mv "LULE" cuck

instead of just killing the people investegating they threw a plane on them hoping all the people investegating it where there at that moment? and there is no proof of that amount of money dissapearing

​@@kdkdndjfjdnn9168they litterally made a statment about not being able to track the money after the plane hit. Educate yourself maaaan.

And yet, somehow, despite this being the PENTAGON - no footage of that 3rd plane hitting exists!!!

Stfu fæg. The world isn't flat

@@sandwich9924 the original conspiracy theory is 2.3 trillion so already wrong bc of brainworms, and it takes 10 seconds of research to get the full context. Rumsfeld never said the money was missing, only that it could not be tracked. The context makes it clear that he’s talking about antiquated accounting practices. The money is not missing (as in, nobody ran out with a briefcase containing 2.3T), but may be difficult to tell what they spent it on. For example, I gave department A $1000 in budget, which they spent - but their accounting systems don’t talk to my accounting systems, so I’m not sure what they spent it on. This is a significant issue, but not as big of an issue as some might make it seem. If I told you to sit down and write down what you spent every penny on, you would likely end up with some number less than your income due to receipts that you lost or things you forgot about - that’s the loose equivalent of this missing money. It’s also worth noting that this number almost certainly double-counts (or more) things - system A improperly tracks a $100 transaction, systems B and C improperly track the same transaction, and we end up with $300 improperly tracked. Alternatively, if I buy a $100 item and fail to correctly track both the expense and the new asset, I’ve just created $200 improperly tracked. Finally, if I improperly track the depreciation of a $100 asset over a decade, I may just have created up to $1000 improperly tracked. The pentagon budget is nowhere near 2.3T. That number includes non-accounting-standards-compliant entries for depreciation on assets, pension funds, liabilities, fixed assets, etc. It’s not a pile of cash, and it’s not all expenditures. It doesn't mean the money was stolen, and it doesn't even necessarily mean they don't know what it was spent on - but it doesn't pass the relevant account standards (That said, bad accounting makes it dramatically easier to hide fraud). In 2002 after some system and process upgrades the number of improperly tracked transactions was reduced to 900B. This is obviously still a large number, and despite subsequent improvements the pentagon’s accounting processes remain deficient to this day. They still have not passed an audit.

People believe who they want to believe. I can say Trump was right, but I can also say Biden is good. Information these days are influenced by everyone and it’s harder to believe one “evidence” which proves something is true

@@Jannerius Replying again because apparently I said some scary words that don't allow editing.(wrote republicans instead of politicians by accident in the second the last sentence) The proof is in the pudding. IE: millions of illegals coming into the country is clearly not good. Puberty blockers and snipping off body parts is not good. Printing trillions of dollars is not good. Releasing a virus from a lab and using it as an excuse to shut down the economy is not good. Vaccine mandates are not good, especially with experimental technology with something that hasn't even been shown to work. Burning cities to the ground over democratic politicians telling everybody that black people are being hunted down by the police is not good. So and so forth. It's obvious all of those things are not good, and we are now seeing the results of half the country being dumb enough to believe any of that is good.

is that why theres so many videos of civilians getting shot up and kids getting beaten up? the kids being beaten up was UK soldiers though caught on CCTV oops...

He's a little slow. Trump said on TV after the hits that there's no way that the most structurally integral scyscraper in the whole world could come down because of a plane.

- Bin Laden was sponsored by the CIA since the 70's - Firefighters heard explosions - Somehow the pilot's passports survived without a scratch - Owner of the buildings received 4,5 billion from the insurance that he took a couple months in advance

out of all the analogys he could have made, this one was the most braindead he could have picked...

​​@@ok-nz7mtit was supported in the 78-82 during the cold war. I don't see how it changes anything. It was a bad decision and they certainly didn't for see what was coming.

still smarter than hasan

Relax larper

Back in my days, bait used to be believable

Your fake "god" won't do anything pal. Only true GOD is Yehowah, GOD of ISRAEL.

@@YehovaFirst says the guys who's whole religion is based on rejecting prophets of God and killing them. the God of Isreal forgets and regrets and racist!

iran better 🥱

ive seen the videos they are all on youtube. your just lying.

@@BartholomewJenkins69420nope, watch some controlled demolitions it’s the exact same

@@jayskate6631 your trolling and not worth arguing with. Fiddy

@@BartholomewJenkins69420 educate yourself bitch boy

@@BartholomewJenkins69420 take your life and stop it

Because the analogy proves the opposite to point, we’ve known the melting temperature of steel for a century and it’s way higher then jet fuel burns. Chocolate melts at 86F so it’s like someone claiming their chocolate melted at 60F.

@jayskate6631 you're missing the point of the argument. It's not about the melting point that's not being reached by burning jet-fuel. The argument is that even without being melted, the structural integrity of the steel, which is necessary to support the building, is lost at a certain point before the steel melts. In other words, the steel bends due to being softened by the heat and can therefore no longer support the weight that it could at a lower temperature. In short, it doesn't matter if the melting point of steel can or can not be reached by burning jet-fuel when it is not even necessary to melt the steel as the structural integrity is compromised at a temperature below the melting point.

@@jayskate6631 Metal's ductility increases as temperature increases. For instance, the strength of steel remains essentially unchanged until about 600°F. The steel retains about 50% of its strength at 1100°F. The steel loses all of its capacity when it melts at about 2700°F. Jet fuel burns at temperatures of 800-1,500°F. Thus, a section of the steel exposed to burning jet fuel for extended period of time would reduce the strength by roughly 50%. I don't know if that would be enough to cause total failure as engineers usually design things to be even stronger than the minimum required, but hope that puts it into perspective. I also think that happens for chocolate but not as pronounced.

@@jayskate6631 Blacksmiths do not melt the material to be worked either, they only shape it by softening it with heat.

@@jayskate6631 In what universe does that analogy prove the opposite? Yes, it's a pretty dumb analogy, but it still relays the point very well. Despite the "chocolate" having a higher melting point, when heat is applied, it'll soften up still, which could lead to the chocolate breaking or collapsing. The building's steel beams being represented as chocolate works well as an analogy. That being said, having the World Trade Center "blown up from the inside" is very much a possibility, but saying that the impact of the plane and the combustion of the jet's fuel are not enough for the building to collapse is an absurdity. (which is the point that XQC was trying to argue.) 🤓

Jet fuel can't melt steel

@@just_a_turtle_chad Thank you for this completed unrelated and groundless fact, person that calls themself a chad.

​@@lhypogirl"Groundless" lulw

​@@just_a_turtle_chadTomfoolery

cringe

saddam was the warlord of the middle east and kept everything stable

I messaged Ethan already and told him about it.

Good job soldier.@@melinagoranson

Welcome to the squaddo xQcL

We all know man the classic big nose k1ke

👃

5 Mossad agents were arrested after they celebrated after the attack.

I think simply saying that it was just for Israel greatly removes Americas own agency in the situation.

@@marac200 They have agency mate. They freely chose to defend Israel at all costs, no?

Then why are u watching? u can watch it without his reaction

ask the kurds or iranians how good of a man he was he was a the hitler of the middle east hard to feel bad for him

What about the countries he was invading?

@@rapid9534you’re just going around saying shit like a bot

@@ghostirq it’s literally history💀 next time pay attention in class child

@@rapid9534 this is the best you can come up with? Well I guess instead of believing what I see and live, I should believe what someone else writes about it and call it history because history writers are honest with no agenda or bias. Your teachers and parents have failed you kid

then continue being a dumbass lol. why believe solely what any one source tells you lmao? why dont you stop being lazy an start fact checking shit an doing more research on things instead of regurgitating it random bs you see online

Johnny Harris himself chooses to believe what the media says or not, depending on how it fits his narrative, his (twisted) political and social views. He is no saint.

Just like any sane person

common sense

im more worried you comment on every xqc video

But was it wrong?

​@@kanals0mans576 People overlook decent analogies just because they sound funny to them at face value. They choose to be deliberately obtuse and say "blud thinks skyscrapers are made of chocolate💀" or some shit just to make the analogy look dumb, when the original analogy was actually pretty accurate. Don't give them the attention they want lol.

Bruh

I LOVE when israelis are documenting the towers right before they go down, are arrested, bragged about it, sent back to israel, then bragged about it on israeli tv! I love the Mossad!!!

@@sunshinyblsm8951 You made Monka laugh

@@sunshinyblsm8951you are spending the rest of your life as a virgin

there is no proof for that at all

so guilty until proven innocent got it

@@Habibi618 i mean that would be the case if they sent nukes because of it which would be bad but they can go in and make sure ur not doing it. because once they do it u cannot stop them or negotiate, idk if u know how powerful nukes are in country to country military negotations.

​@Rosspkc why does the us get to decide who has nukes when they literally have thousands

Neither is ok

🥲

Pretty sure women were not sent on the battlefield

@@Green-ader Clueless

@@femto2099 I’m not

@@Green-ader Yes, they were. Ann Hester is one of the most famous from the Iraq War, killing 3 insurgents in an ambush.

@@lilpain8883oh wow 100000 men and 30 women Good job

For what? He’s literally helping Ukraine defend themselves from Russia

@@rapid9534 testing new guns and overall war materials…..

STEAL

@@bruman182 nice catch

@@digitalhouse6969 the fire protection was blown off on impact and steel softened not melted

Good thing they didn't melt dumbass Go buy a chocolate bar, put it under some constant heat, and it'll fall apart. You people have brain issues

completely missing the point

let's not act like he was a Saint either

@@ayo0702More of a saint than the war criminals that are your presidents

He most definitely wasn't

More like rest in piss

​@@ayo0702still he didnt let isis loose, ruin a nation or let 1.5 million people be killed for no reason or false reasons.

I've heard him questioning videos like 20 times. This isn't anything new or unique to this video.

Okay what? That's not true at all, a lot of videos of Jonny Harris he is critical of. He even starts of by saying it's biased and politically motivated etc

he said that for this video... when did he say that for any other one@@ardel-4964

he doesnt question jonny harris when he watched his other videos as much as he does in this one, literally go back and look stop waffling @@burntwaffles696

And here we go, another fool who has to think everything is suspicious or a conspiracy Literally made a conspiracy about xQc reacting, hilarious. Dumb mf

I could tell he was biased about few things.

he can't upload for a few days

Yes, America bad on the day a very justified revenge attack was committed

💀 they're bad no matter what day it is

name checks out

And you take that anger out on the innocent civilians who died that day. You're a real hero bro @@sledgerbro

@@sledgerbroyou say that as you use American apps 💀 cope