This is the best review of the Yamaha classical transacoustic on youtube that I've found so far. Thank you for taking the time to do this review. And you are a great guitarist, too. Beautiful playing.
An excellent review for this guitar. I never knew classical guitars had advanced so much electronically. This one is worth getting just for the advanced technology alone. Thanks for posting!
Itd probably require a small circuit processing bucket brigade type of thing that can ping a sound. It would be hard replicate delay without a tiny speaker or some insane jolt of movement like a rumble to get the second sound of the delayed guitar. Maybe they can figure out to do it.
I was looking for a cheap Yamaha nylon for recording a project and came across this one. The only one they had in the store was a steel string one which was amazing. I still ordered a nylon cos I have three steel strings but I was moved by how lovely in was and absorbing to play
Hi there everyone, could anyone please tell me the Depth of this Guitar as I would like to buy it but there are no stores near me that sells them where I could go and try it , it was like a Dreadnought Depth it would be far to Big and Uncomfortable for me as I am a small person. Many Thanks Ian
you should have gotten the NCX not NTX if you are looking for a CG. usa.yamaha.com/products/musical_instruments/guitars_basses/cl_guitars/nx/specs.html#product-tabs
I purchased one, it was defective in the mechanism, the replacement I got was also defective. I gave up. My dealer had ordered one for another customer, and he had to send it back for same reason. Too bad, I really liked it.
I tried this guitar but in my opinion it's not worth the money. I tried Yamahas CG192s which is about the same price and I liked it way more. The sounds coming out of the system aren't very inspiring if you ask me (nobody asked)
@@legatomodi3522 Hi! The playability and sound of the CG192S is much better in my opinion. Sure the effecs are fun but when compared the sound without effects then the CG192S is a clear winner in my book. I was excited about the CG-TA and when I tried it I wasn't blown away with the effects. Sure it's an ok guitar even without the effects but not worth the price in my opinion. But maybe you need to try it for yourself, maybe you would like it more than I did. But if you appreciate playability and sound without effects then go for the CG192S.
@@PresentMoment111 i usually run a train of more than dozen pedals when I play electric. I like them but they can't be the foundation of tone. These effects are probably very limited compared to what I usually try. I guess I'd be better off trying for the best quality over the gimmick. Do you know if acoustic electric guitars suffer from the same thing you've noticed in the guitar in the video?
@@soofitnsexy Yeah, I wonder how so many people likes it, good for them but I think the trans stuff completely ruins the unique feel and sound of a classical guitar.
Consumo de batería 🔋 es muy elevado. saldrá caro .🥴 no trae funda no tiene golpeadores el piezo no recoge el golpe en la tapa falta un simulación de micro y está alta el puente de la mano derecha de la tapa los 2 nut son platico.
Weak demo. I have one of those, and in the video the effects barely show. This demo did not show a third of the guitar capabilities. The guitar is much more impressive in person.
@@markbowman3 thank you! I just watched the whole demo. I thought it was an absolutely awesome demo . He covered the guitar very well. Showed the effects extremely well. His playing was very good. Excellent demo
please make a better video then.... the compression in the you tube format will never sound as good as in person- but I think this is a pretty good video and a great player
The guitar player says the nut is 52mm. I can tell from where I sitting that it is not! T he guitar player says the nut is 52mm. I can tell that it is not!
