You Are Wrong Physicists! Characteristic X-Rays, Binding Energy Values Are Invalid, New Na Picture 

MY PHYSICS THEORY, PART 322 Wrong Models And Wrong Calculations Of Accepted Physics: Binding Energies Of Innermost Electrons In Atoms, Energy Levels Values Of Electron Shells, And K Alpha, K Beta Characteristic X-Ray Production Model Are Invalid
According to my theory and my formulas
-You Are Wrong Physicists! Binding Energies Of Innermost Electrons In Atoms And Energy Levels Values Of Electron Shells Are Invalid
-If my thoughts and calculations I will explain now were wrong, the Sodium atom spectral lines values I predicted and computed according to my theory and my formulas would not agree with the experimental, observational data.
1-A free electron, whether displaces or not, continuously and perpetually emits consecutive spherical, ring-shaped intertwined, inter-connected light waves. You cannot think of a free electron without its consecutive effective waves. Thus, you cannot consider the interaction of an electron with other objects, electrons or waves independently of the interaction of its consecutive effective waves with these objects, electrons, or waves. These consecutive waves have nothing to do with de Broglie’s accompanying waves of a moving objects. Therefore, a high speed electron cannot hit and remove the innermost K shell electron, without touching and removing any of the other 41 electrons in a molybdenum atom. Since the electron is not a billiard ball hitting left and right, there must be another mechanism for characteristic x-ray production. I explained how these processes work according to my theory, and I will explain further.
Whereas accepted physics theories don’t discern this fact. They thought an electron as a projectile that causes the formation of the Bremmstrahlung and characteristic x-ray.
I will now show how acceptep physics characteristic x-ray production model is inconsistent in practice, even assuming it is true, and in connection with this, I will also show how the binding energy values were calculated incorrectly.
2-If the electron in the M shell in the Sodium atom had fallen into the K shell, which is not possible, according to my theory, its energy would have increased from 9th ionization energy(299.864 eV) to the 11th ionization energy(1648.702 eV) level, in other words, smallest 9th electron with 4.1358 nm wavelength would have shrunk to be 11th and smallest electron with 0.7522 nm wavelength. Thus, while shrinking, this electron would have pour out Single Wave Pulse(characteristic beta x ray) at 1348.638 eV energy with 0.91945 nm.
Whereas, in accepted physics theories, data from NIST, beta KM value is 1.1575 nm and energy is 1071.1 eV. Innermost electron’s binding energy in a sodium atom shown as 1070 eV, in Berkeley university data. The discrepancy is that when you apply 1071.1volts to an electron to send to Sodium atom, except two smallest electrons all 9 electrons ionize. Among the ionized electrons is the electron in the M shell at 299.864 eV. In such a case, the smallest(innermost) electron wouldn’t be ionized and, since the electron in the M shell would have been ionized before, Beta characteristic x ray production process would not be possible, even if the smallest electron in the K shell wasn’t there. The second inconsistency is that when you apply 1071.1 V to accelerate electron to strike to sodium atom, you cannot remove the innermost electron, you cannot even remove the electron from the L shell. To do this, you need at least 1648.702 eV energy, and this is the innermost electron’s binding energy of Sodium atom, not 1071.1 eV.
-You Are Wrong Physicists! Characteristic X-Rays, Binding Energy Values Are Invalid, New Na Picture
Metin Arıdaşır 10.07.2024
DATA FROM
1- NIST(National Institute Of Standards and Technology -x-ray wavelengths and x ray atomic energy levels, internet
2-Ionization Energies Of Elements(data page) Wikipedia, internet
3-NIST sodium spectral lines, internet
4-Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory- Electron Binding Energies, internet