@@hero-gaming_yt8377 like tic-tac-toe there's no single combination of moves to win, but white can win in all positions if played correctly, the full size of all the combinations is in my computer but its too large to send through here (1556 petabytes)
@@channellastname3527 as long as people play chess to a live audience, there will be people thinking they see what’s best, I saw people in hikaru’s chat earlier saying “omg free rook what are you doing?” And 7 turns later the poor guy was mated, people are idiots
was playing chess with a friend the other day, he is like 300 elo higher than me, and when we were playing i forfeited because i saw he had a forced mate in 4, he didnt notice it until after i explained it to him. moral of the story... your opponent wont always see what you see
I had a good banter with this guy who just started posting lyrics and I completed them. He asked me why I didn't take the free rook and I realized he didn't see the mate in 1 he had on me (I moved a pawn to free space for my king
It's so annoying when this happens When I play in school there are always lots of people saying "duude you could have taken the rook with the beashop lool what a game" and the beashop is FUCKING PINNED
I've found that backseating their games instead works wonders against this. It's hilarious to me because often than not I'm right due to being like 400 more elo than them
This is why I resist the urge to tell my opponents they have mate when I want to let them have the satisfaction instead of just resigning, because I range from mid 600s to high 900s in the 5|5 games and I think I see lots of things and then lose my queen.
Unless I’m wrong (I could very easily be wrong here), at 0:20 instead of moving the bishop to f6, he could take the knight with the queen and that would be checkmate
The bishop moved to f6 to capture a knight that was there, since knights can protecting eachother the queen would just be killed by the knight. To be fair it is hard to see in this clip so I understand why'd you missed
@@pa28cfi im just confused how someone can be following the chess world yet be so bad at the game in it itself. It takes like 3-4 weeks to get atleast a 1000 rating
I just downloaded chess yersterday and was playing online, I still haven't got my ELO as I need 5 matches and on my 2nd one I did like 3 blunders in a row and I think the enemy pitied me so much that he resigned. That's how bad I am.
