You will be amazed with this engine | Love Creativity 

Lol , same

@@divyammakwana591 hola

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

Same bro 😂

yeah same energy here lol

💪

A review xe LD toy 2.4g trên shopee đi a

Tuổi thọ động cơ có đc lâu k bạn. Mình sợ chạy quá công suất nó nhanh hỏng

Triệu view kìa a

Waste of money and time! 😴😴😴

Love how 99% of people that read this coment wont understand it

Many EV's have regenerative braking to charge their batteries. But in a locomotive theres no batteries to charge so that energy gets converted into heat in a giant resistance strip, much like your toaster oven.

The middle and top motors are working as a generator but these motors are not slowing down the turning motor until there is no load connected to the middle and top motor because according to Faraday's law it will oppose the motion when there is a current flowing in the armature winding and you can clearly see that terminals are open for middle and top motor

I was about to ask how this works, I guess my tired brain didn’t bother to look at the polarity, I was just thinking “how does fewer powered motors equal higher RPM?”

When I was 8 years old I did this kinda stuff, sure wish we had cameras then I'd be a millionaire

Me too 😂

Okay Shivlund pujari

Not quite, because the motors from the middle are working under stress due to the fact that the first line are rotating the middle line with a different ratio (reduce ratio) BUT the middle line are power the same as the first and they are trying to output the same as first. Therefore the middle line are trying to rotate as the first because the voltage but they are push down because the ratio of the first.

@@MirceaD28 engga bisa bahasa enggres

It's not a engine it's a motor A mechanical energy which is produced by burning fuel is called an engine A mechanical energy which is produced by electrical known as motor First clarify both difference between engine and motor

The Americans call them car engine " motor " . And elsewhere bikes are called "motorcycles"

@@papayongsarninei8133 what engineers in America said for engine then 🧐

This guy is stupid bro😂 using motor instead of gear

Exactly .! 3 unused motors .😁🤷‍♂️. Wasting energy at mid and upper level. 🙈

This is just for experiment So enjoy it

@@r.iyushofficial5318 experiment is a part of scientific method ; so scientific method include ; 1. Purpose/QuestionAsk a question. 2. Research 3. Hypothesis 4. Experiment 5. Data/Analysis 6. Conclusion ( proving the hypothesis) 😁love to know what is your conclusion ?

@@privatedumma Conclusion :your this comment will help me in my project analysis So, thanks

They would be better off just ringing a great reduction. And boot through a magnetic field that is eating away at the power. It would have been more rise to run a positive ratio into another then taking power into another motor

yes that's why he doesn't show the rpm result for the single motor with no load on other shaft at 6:04, I guess it's might close or even better rpm to all motor joined but the benefit for joining motor as you said it got more torque for sure.

Why he didn't attach all motors, there is already resistance from the output(propeller/water) wich should even the force given from all off them?

no they dont

since all the motors are parallelly connected, the motors that spin faster would have a back-emf greater than the ones that spin slower. the faster motor then tries to feed power into the slower motor, this is the majority of where the power is lost. the motors must be geared in a 1:1 ratio so all the back-emf of the motors are equal and no motor is trying to power the other motor. its also the main reason why the single motor is slower, but when the three faster spinning motor is disconnected it spins faster. because the three slower spinning motor is gearing up towards the faster one, and because the faster motors are now disconnected no back-emf is stealing power.

Sip

ok

Oi

Koe nang Vietnam po

lawak cok.

Được như dùng điện để tạo ra điện à =))

@@thientamhuynhvo4293 no, lấy bánh xoay nước lắp vào, hoặc quạt gió để tạo ra điện ( hiểu ý tui rồi chứ )

Wow, really? 👏⭐Talk about missing the point, entirely.

Actually, they are holding the magnets in place. Nice guess though. These are only cooled by radiating heat.

@@csorrows magnets??? Wasn’t it clearance for the bigger sprockets?

@@csorrows No they're not look up how a electric motor works plus when the electric motor is running you can feel air being passed through those Vents so don't act like you know what you're talking about when you don't

@@juankruger2598 No I'm not missing the point because if you want a product to last and be reliable it it needs a couple things which is lubrication and cooling Yeah it's a fun little science project but wouldn't it be nice if we taught our children to to build a device properly Instead of sealing up the slits that help cool the electric motor

yo los hubiera conectado todos motores con engranes iguales tendría un troque mucho mayor quizá con un menos rpm pero un torque mucho mayor.

@@gbbarragan5576 serian muy pocos rpm? Para que serviría tanto torque?

I saw small electro motors 2 x 2 cm running on 60 rpm you cannot stop with your hand.

@@pabloleonardocaffa1972 torque es necesario por ejemplo para hacer una batidora, vehículo terrestre o un submarino, si tienes poco torque el empuje es pobre, tiene poca fuerza contra la resistencia. Igualmente el experimento que muestra el vídeo es una tontería porque el torque que consigue es gracias al engranaje y no a los motores extra que añade, con un único motor y engranajes puedes conseguir más torque de la misma forma que funciona un caja de transmisión y además consigues una aceleración más suave.

@@tantumDicoQuodCogito exacto

but less torque will be there

Mung ah mahal

Good. You are right. The front motor works against the remaining five because of wrong connection to voltage.

They were being used to harvest energy thus the reverse configuration! Unfortunately they create more drag than they add to current, darn thermal dynamics.

they're to locate the magnets, they're not vents

Na they are vents

@@theunofficialdog4844 uh, ok then. The poor bastard is gonna die now?

Yes and it's disturbing..but i enjoyed it

And braking the last motor to death by fire.

Cháy luôn ấy chứ

Chuẩn luôn này làm nhìn cho hằm hố chứ hiệu quả thì...

cuối cùng dùng có 3 động cơ, còn 3 motor kia k có đấu nguồn, có chức năng tiêu tốn động năng của 3 motor có đấu nguồn :))))))

😁

6 mo tơ phải chạy chung 1 trục mới tận dụng đc hết công xuất

Lol 🤣🤣

Noice

More like power is being spread across 6 so lower average vs being spread across 5, then 3.

You're wrong. Although each motor is different and uses a different current, the momentum of the force that forces the rotor in the motor to move faster is the same as if the motor were operating independently. And it helps the whole group with the workload. You can see them as six rotors on one axis. Each of them adds its momentum to a common axis. Thus, the six motors provide six times more momentum, allowing them to turn much faster with the same load.

@@mareksykora779 you can’t think of it that way because of the gearing involved. imagine trying to help someone push up something with a first class lever. You are on the same side as someone else, and you can both push at the same strength (let’s say 100 N) trying to lift something up (both of your person’s hands are handcuffed to the lever, comparison sake since that is how gears work). If you try pushing up a meter from the fulcrum, meanwhile someone else is pushing up 3 meters away from the fulcrum at the same force as you, you are relatively exerting much less force and essentially become a weight because relativisticly your force is much less and so you are adding to what the one with a better mechanical advantage has to lift.

​@@snaeshaads8203 No. You see it wrong. At the moment somebody else with much bigger force pushes, then you have immediatelly less load and can run faster to "catch up". You see it wrong because you think that the speed of all is constant. But it is not. Everbody who at some moment got less load (because somebody else was faster), immediatelly speeds up because of no load. It is like a sledge pulled by a horse and a dog at the same time. They both can run very fast under no load. At first you let only the dog to pull the sledge. It will be very slow. Then you add a horse, which immediatelly takes all the load because of its speed and power. But the dog doesn't stay in back. Under zero load it immediatelly increases its spped and is faster then the horse pulling sledge so it also pushes his part and the sledge speeds up, because both horse and dog work with their power. A nice ballance regulation works there. Whenever somebody is slightly faster then he takes more load, which reduces his speed, and others get less load which helps them to "catch up the edge" and push more. And so on and so on. Autocontroling system. But what is important. The power unit in this case is not the whole electric motor. It si just the coils pushed by magnetic fields on the rotor which push to one common shaft made by all individual shafts of all motors connected by constant gearings. Also here the coil can "run" very fast without the load and "catch up" slower running motor shaft. But because of solid connection of the coil and the rotor the actual ballancig of speed and load can only be meassurred by meassuring a tension in the piece of metal connecting the coil with the shaft.

@@mareksykora779 I don't have the time to read so much, but if you try to push a motor faster than its maximum RPM while it is operating, the motor will start working as a generator and actually begin to resist the force you are exerting on it's system. Try pedaling faster when you are on an electric bicycle, it will show you intuitively what some of the people here are talking about.

Да-да. В этой схеме большие механические потери. Но смотреть было интересно😂

Да ещё и один моторчик подключён неправильно

Cùng kích thước mà

@@mythachlong3166 không , bạn thấy bánh răng của 3 mô tơ phía sau k ? , bánh răng nhỏ truyền qua bánh răng lớn hàng 2 , như vậy thì bánh răng nhỏ phải quay nhiều vòng hơn để bánh răng lớn mới đi hết chu kỳ 1 vòng, vậy là lệch rồi đó , thiết kế như clip là sai kỹ thuật hoàn toàn

Ngon vô mà làm nói ngu cũng nói Ngta làm chơi chứ ko có làm như ng chuyên nghiệp

Ngta làm cho nó có sức tải bố ơi, cùng kích thước thì nó tải méo gì

@@iamshiba3290 tăng sức tải bằng cách ghì động cơ lại à ? Bạn có biết làm như vậy là những động cơ hàng 2 và hàng 1 sẽ nóng và giảm tuổi thọ không ? Và trên thế giới những kỹ sư , nhà khoa học không làm như vậy để tăng sức tải ? Vì nó tốn kém và không khả thi . ok

Tự làm tự xem đi

😂

Kgsktfdotm Ufbd

@@luckylast1373 aygjshsa Hshsh

No legend try with his own hands

@@dhruv18307 😂no they are ultra legend

69th like lmao Edit: *Mission failed suck sus full E*

Yes . I thought same like you. I think he don't know about friction..🤔

I agree...in addition from 5:55 to 6:20, assuming he used the same voltage on both cases...wouldn't his so called engine produce more power (since 3 dc motors are connected in parallel with each other) compared to a single dc motor?...which made it turn the prop faster, considering the prop's weight and air resistance, compared to the single dc motor...am i right?...'cause, him, adding the 3 other dc motors doesn't really make sense to me

@@FlameKaiser_1 Not shure what you mean but my thinking is that the first 3 motors when they run at say 1000rpm the last motor would run at only about 250rpm. So if the last motor was to run at about 1000rpm the first 3 would have to run at about 4000rpm and that would cause more drag and just slow it down so it would be better to just run the first motor alone.

@@oliverknowles3229 what i mean was, assuming he used similar voltage, and each dc motor produced let's assume 10watts...wouldn't his engine produce 30watts since the motors are connected in parallel...and lets say the 10watts produced by a single dc motor wasn't enough to turn the prop fast considering it's weight and air resistance(basing on his setup)...haven't done an actual experiment so i'm just using my imagination, and i'm not sure if my analysis is correct

same thoughts here, why run a reduction gearbox if the gear generate there own resistance.

Hmm you are intelligent

@@Smritys_World thank you, i have done all these stuff in my school time.

no its making torgue

@@sameerrind744 brother this can be easily done by a single motor, if you want to generate torque.

Thats right🤗🤗

4:49 e o RU-vid indica isso pra mim kkkkkk

@@willianrafael3999 e eu as 2:12

@@willianrafael3999 Pior que é maneirasso kkkkk

Achei que o cara ia fazer um mini aviao

kkkkkkkkkkkkkk

Ещё и в противоположную сторону🤦🏻‍♂️

@@mirasmiracle6282 почему в противоположную то, обычный мультипликатор. 😁

Даа...так это что ..рацпредложением попахивает ???...

@@user-ru6in1ct5m 😂, а зачем использовать только шестерни, когда можно использовать еще и двигатели. Хотя бы даже и тупо как маховик на валу этой шестерни. 😂😂😂 Инженеры идиоты. Автор гений. 😂😂😂

@@Arhont_forever так а я о чем....

Wth

@@jaggill5279 🤣🤣🤣😂

The gear ratio actually makes them slower than the bottom 3 motors.

How you know prindapan?

It's cheap to buy especially the DC motors

U can find then everywhere bro, radio with old cards, anything with cd music play, small fan, remote small cars, anything that rotates

He did that right man

Шо там не так? Я просто не разбираюсь

@@user-gp2ng3yy6k моторы не крутятся быстрее. Увеличивается только крутящий момент. Меня позабавила толщина шестерёнок и грёбаный термоклей с позиционированием на глаз. хотя к концу видео вроде проглядывалась адекватность.

@Анатолий Горчанин должны. Но вырастает крутящий момент. На сколько я понял, суть видео втом, что бы увеличить крутящий момент

Помоему передний двигатель не в той полярности.

@@amego2458 но каждый последующий ряд моторов тормозит предыдущий из-за того что передаточное число уменьшается. КПД крч падает. Шестерни в этом конкретном случае должны быть одного размера (одно количество зубов)

Exactly 😊

Yep

consider using atomic tuned motor from Tamiya then it has balanced torque & RPM lol

@@dr.franxx which is not possible?

More like, torque OR rpm. That's how gearboxes work, it's a tradeoff between one and the other.