Тёмный

Your Daily Equation #21: Bell's Theorem and the Non-locality of the Universe 

World Science Festival
Подписаться 1,3 млн
Просмотров 192 тыс.
50% 1

Episode 21 #YourDailyEquation: Albert Einstein and his colleagues Podolsky and Rosen proposed a simple way to rid quantum mechanics of its most disturbing feature--called non-locality--in which an action undertaken here can affect the result of a measurement undertaken there, even if here and there are far apart. John Bell came up with a way to test Einstein's vision of reality, ultimately showing that Einstein's vision was wrong.
Even if your math is a bit rusty, join Brian Greene for brief and breezy discussions of pivotal equations and exciting stories of nature and numbers that will allow you to see the universe in a new way.
The World Science Festival (WSF) is an innovative multi-media organization that produces original live and digital content straddling the arenas of science, technology, the arts, media, performance and education. With the goal of radically transforming public perceptions of science, WSF creates world-class programming, both live on stage and televised, featuring inspired collaborations, outstanding talent and novel production techniques that bring scientific discovery, insight and perspective to a broad general audience.
Official Site: www.worldsciencefestival.com
Twitter: / worldscifest
Facebook: / worldsciencefestival
Instagram: / worldscifest
Subscribe: / worldsciencefestival

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

3 май 2020

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 763   
@moonymachine8125
@moonymachine8125 Год назад
This video is just the best for someone like me, an amateur physics enthusiast, trying to understand the 2022 Nobel Prize. Thank you Professor Greene! I remember when I first saw The Elegant Universe on Nova in my bedroom as a kid in high school. You opened my mind to the beauty and wonder of the universe. It truly changed my life. I've also recently read The Hidden Reality. You are a treasure to humanity. I didn't expect to suddenly be gushing your praises, but you really have done so much for me when I think about it. So, thank you very much!
@markdavich5829
@markdavich5829 4 года назад
Professor, I just wanted to say how much I enjoy your presentations. I'm not a student or physicist, I'm just a retired automotive tech who has read all your books plus those of Lisa Randall, Leonard Susskind and Stephan Hawking and others. I can't do the math but it's a wonderful thing to listen, read and ponder the world around me. Especially these days. Thanks very much professor.
@schrodingersdad6077
@schrodingersdad6077 3 года назад
Awesome
@jaapongeveer6203
@jaapongeveer6203 2 года назад
It doesn't matter what you did to put food on the table, what matters is you have an inquisitive and seeking mind!
@bendavis2234
@bendavis2234 2 года назад
You might be interested in Leonard Susskind’s lectures if you haven’t seen them yet. If you’re interested in learning math/physics and have a basic knowledge of calculus, his lectures are perfect. He covers many of the important equations and describes the mathematical techniques that are essential for understanding physics (bra-ket vectors, tensors, etc.). It doesn’t take the place of taking university courses in physics, but it’s more like Feynman’s lectures where it’s entertaining and informative at the same time. It’s worth looking into if you’re curious.
@TheGuruNetOn
@TheGuruNetOn Год назад
Stanford University RU-vid channel has a set of Leonard Susskind video courses (check out their playlists for Susskind courses) to match a 4 book series and a website on "Physics The Theoretical Minimum" required to understand 1) Classical Mechanics, 2) Quantum Mechanics, 3) Special Relativity and the upcoming 4) General Relativity. These courses are specifically meant for curious adults like yourself who couldn't pursue their interest in Physics "cos life got in the way". The 3 books + 1 upcoming book teach the basic minimum Math and Physics required to understand Physics.
@prydin
@prydin Год назад
I've seen lots of attempts to explain this with fancy graphics but it never really clicked for me. Then this guy comes along and calmly explains it from his living room without any whizbang graphical aids and it all falls into place. Bravo, professor!
@martijn130370
@martijn130370 4 года назад
Wow thanks professor Greene, this is the first time ever that I have heard an explanation of this subject that I could get my head around. Have not missed one episode so far. Your Daily Equation is the best thing to have come out of this corona crisis for sure!
@joeboxter3635
@joeboxter3635 2 года назад
Yeah, it's really good. I think Sabina hoffstader could benefit from this. She is claiming there is no spooky action at distance and the state at start is simply not known, ie a hidden variable. In other words she assert EPR. Yet Bells Inequality refutes EPR notion.
@jacobvandijk6525
@jacobvandijk6525 2 года назад
"Fine" example of MODERN PHYSICS: You have to BELIEVE guys like him. Running this experiment??? WHERE was it done, mate? And by WHOM? Jesus (if he existed) convinced a couple of dumb fisthermen to spread his strange ideas, nowaday physicists do the same on RU-vid. There too many theoretical physicists! But still they can't explain the magnetic moment of a proton. Physics is going down the drain!
@rgveitch
@rgveitch Год назад
Came here to make this comment. I have read and seen so many explanations but this is the first I have understood.
@cyberfunk3793
@cyberfunk3793 Год назад
@@joeboxter3635 She doesn't say so if you watch the video more carefully.
@peterkay7458
@peterkay7458 Год назад
@@joeboxter3635 i am stopping at 29 minutes in case he loses me can you say coward. Sabina seems angr these days lol honestly the truly tagic part is i get her anger and have it too. we dont need a biger lhc
@timjones1815
@timjones1815 4 года назад
Professor Greene that was amazing! I have never seen or read a better explanation of Bell's Theorem than you have just given. Very clear, very passionate. It is a joy to share your joy of physics.
@paulc96
@paulc96 4 года назад
Dear Prof. Greene, Thank you again for this wonderful series. Like the previous “commenter”, I have not missed a single episode. And I also think that Your Daily Equation is one of the best things that have come about since the start of the Corona virus pandemic. I would also like to say that, although I am a Science graduate, unfortunately I have never been very good at Math(s). However, this last episode of Your Daily Equation (21), is the first time that I have ever managed to understand Bell’s Theorem. Thanks again! One small point that I would like mention, is that - during the Quantum Mechanics episode of the NOVA series : The Fabric of the Cosmos; you equated the EPR Entanglement proposal as being more like a pair of gloves, set in advance as left & right, rather than the standard QM picture of “Fuzziness” until measured. I thought that the pair of gloves analogy was an excellent way of putting it. I am only surprised that you did not mention it in yesterday’s episode. And I still maintain that The Fabric of the Cosmos episode on QM is one of the very best explanations & visualisations of aspects of Quantum Mechanics, from Probability Waves to the Entanglement pair of gloves. I am going to re-watch episode 21 of Your Daily Equation, to make sure that I can still understand Bell’s Theorem. Many thanks again Prof. Greene. with best regards, Paul C.
@bjornmossberg3989
@bjornmossberg3989 Год назад
Being able to bridge the abyss between the formulas and the easy to relate to observable reality is truly a gift, which often, as it did in this case, brings understanding and happiness to the audience. Even to, as in this case, someone with a PhD in elementary particle physics. Thank you!
@Dr10Jeeps
@Dr10Jeeps 4 года назад
Dr. Greene's ability to explain complex phenomena in simple, understandable terms is so powerful it's akin to having your cognitive ability grow exponentially in the space of one hour. Watching his videos in various forums including this one is a treat to be cherished. How fascinating life has become with scholars like Brian Greene filling the internet with truly interesting, meaningful, and mind expanding information. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
@aubreylafrance5035
@aubreylafrance5035 3 года назад
Wonderful ! I love these none formal lessons where I understand everything
@adamadiallo845
@adamadiallo845 4 года назад
Finally understood Bell's inequality. Thank you.
@jacobvandijk6525
@jacobvandijk6525 2 года назад
"Fine" example of MODERN PHYSICS: You have to BELIEVE guys like him. @40:00 Running this experiment??? WHERE was it done, mate? And by WHOM? Jesus (if he existed) convinced a couple of dumb fisthermen to spread his strange ideas, nowaday physicists do the same on RU-vid. There too many theoretical physicists! But still they can't explain the magnetic moment of a proton, after zillions and zillions of collisions at the LHC. Physics is going down the drain!
@jacobvandijk6525
@jacobvandijk6525 2 года назад
@@StellardroneMusic hahaha, science isn't based on trust.
@brazenzebra
@brazenzebra Год назад
Your video, your explanation is the best! I finally understood what's really going on with EPR and QM and Bell's Inequality. Thank you so much. You needed every minute of this video to explain it well, and you did explain it well.
@DannyElmakawi
@DannyElmakawi 4 года назад
Hi Dr. Greene. What a great explanation. Your ability to communicate complex physics in a way that's so graspable to us lay people never ceases to amaze me. In a future video, do you think you could give us a primer on what a "light cone" is? Thanks so much for these videos.
@martinalenius-personalwamo2552
@martinalenius-personalwamo2552 3 года назад
The best presentation/lecture I have ever seen. And great graphics.
@broken_radar
@broken_radar 3 года назад
Thank you, Brian. I am slowly working my way through these so that maybe I can understand them better. I very much appreciate your efforts.
@artscience9981
@artscience9981 Год назад
Great intuitive, yet rigorous, description, of a complex physical phenomena, or in simpler terms, great teaching! Thanks for your time and effort in putting these explanations out in public.
@notthatbirdman
@notthatbirdman 4 года назад
Best video of the series. Your passion, enthusiasm, and intellect ooze in this one.
@sandeepchoudhary9530
@sandeepchoudhary9530 Год назад
A wonderful, non technical explanation of one of the profound insights of quantum world. Have been a great admirer of your clarity of thought ever since I read The Elegant Universe and The Fabric of Cosmos. Thie admiration only grows after watching such videos. Keep sharing.
@haimkohan9241
@haimkohan9241 3 года назад
I am not sure whether you still read the comments, but I want to tell you that you are great!! I am a yoga teacher and I don't know much physics but I like to read and here and there read and saw videos about Bell's theorem but never understood what they are talking about. You made it so clear and simple, and showed how the ideas behind it are just mind blowing and wonderful. I loved it!!! And I want to thank you for taking time and explaining these beautiful things. I feel like adding, I cannot believe it, I cannot believe nonlocal causality, it is spooky :-). Thank you from Israel - I go through the daily equations one by one - really love it.
@ggrthemostgodless8713
@ggrthemostgodless8713 Год назад
As long as you don't follow or believe Deepak Chopra and his misuse of quantum mechanics and all his other bs, you are on the right corner, yoga teachers tend to love that charlatan. All his followers (Deepak's) should listen to THIS video several times to deprogram their heads from his bs, he uses a lot fo "action at a distance" etc to confuse people.
@physicsjagat
@physicsjagat Год назад
So far I ve watched so much of videos & read about Bell's theorem ,but description given by you sir is remarkable,now fully understood where the Einstein & Bohr world was conflicted .
@ajoebo9095
@ajoebo9095 Месяц назад
BRAVO!!!!!!!!! To me, the layman that I am in your incredibly interesting field, you Professor Greene are an outstanding teacher enabling someone like me to understand in simple terms that which is complex and deeply non-intuitive. Thanks for doing this.
@rickmorrisrigar
@rickmorrisrigar 4 года назад
Professor Greene with all due respect, my head almost EXPLODED !!!
@mskEduTech
@mskEduTech 4 года назад
Your Daily Equation is the best thing to have come out of this corona crisis for sure.
@rrazdan1
@rrazdan1 Год назад
Thanks Professor Greene. I have tried to grapple with the Bell's inequality theorem for a long time. Your video was the first one that I've seen that explained everything so clearly. I'm down with Covid right now but I feel lucky to have used this opportunity to come across your video.
@philipkatzan9973
@philipkatzan9973 4 года назад
Good series. Really enjoy them. When is the classes available?
@fultzjap
@fultzjap 4 года назад
This channel is the only one that I watch live, above working or parenting, because I simply can't wait a few hours and watch it later.
@rajatkumarpanda9255
@rajatkumarpanda9255 4 года назад
This is the best episode till now... Can you make an episode on quantum eraser problem too!! Please 🤩🤩
@lizelleschutte8489
@lizelleschutte8489 2 года назад
Thank you for making this subject clear it brings metaphysics to mind for me
@trout3685
@trout3685 6 месяцев назад
gotta love this guy. i feel like i gained a lot of progress in my understanding of bells theorem although i still don't have the math figured out but that takes time. even still, it was a fascinating watch and i love his enthusiasm
@tictacX1
@tictacX1 3 года назад
Very appreciated, thank you. Clearest explanation I've seen yet.
@joserobertopacheco298
@joserobertopacheco298 2 года назад
Complete, simple, understandable, amazing explanation of the Bell’s article.
@topredtv3275
@topredtv3275 4 года назад
It's absolutely scandalous that Jon Bell didn't win a Noble prize for this 🤯🤯🤯
@brainpain5260
@brainpain5260 4 года назад
I agree with you. He may not have won it because he died too soon after the Aspect experiments were won. You can't win the Nobel post mortem. I think the window between the confirmation and his death simply passed by.
@juancarlosv5136
@juancarlosv5136 Год назад
Thank you very much Dr. Green, I am absolutely delighted hearing you (indeed listening this more than one time)
@NalitaQubit
@NalitaQubit 2 месяца назад
Thank you, Dr. Green, for such wonderful series. We are all grateful for your hard work.
@slowdownnn11
@slowdownnn11 4 года назад
these are solid gold, love these videos so much
@blaze-pn6fk
@blaze-pn6fk 4 года назад
This was awesome. Thank you sm!
@mskEduTech
@mskEduTech 4 года назад
Dear Prof. please continue your daily equation for eternity , we are all definitely enjoying it.
@hikmatullahpakhtoon3694
@hikmatullahpakhtoon3694 Год назад
Beautiful description of more complex ideas in simple words. Thanks professor
@pettiprue
@pettiprue 3 года назад
I love your stuff so much Brian.
@blueSkyIs1
@blueSkyIs1 Год назад
Thanks, Dr. Green! Great video...beautiful explanation of this surprising aspect of science!
@777mehran
@777mehran Год назад
Amazing explanation. Thank you professor Greene.
@WildGamez
@WildGamez 3 года назад
Wonderfully and patiently explained
@CBN_PK_GoldenAp
@CBN_PK_GoldenAp Год назад
I was looking at nearly 10 videos to understand this concept and learnt 50% from those videos... With this one video I understood the whole concept and so amazing and gifted Brian greene... I dont mean I understand quantum mechanics which is always strange but the problem associated with EPR and Bell Please continue to make such videos as others only make talks but you talk in mathematical , descriptive and imagery explanations and it is mind bogglingly simple None could have thought that quantum mechanics could be so simply explainable
@archuss
@archuss Год назад
Need more series like this ❤️
@k0b3r
@k0b3r 8 месяцев назад
Thank's for a clear explanation about this issue! Very many youtubers and other physicists try to explain it, but Brian Greene had it pretty well done. Thank You!
@samuelcrookes8211
@samuelcrookes8211 Год назад
Thanks Brian, definitely the best explanation and animation I've seen of the test of Bell's inequality. But I think at the end of the video where you committed to a conclusion that the universe is non-local, missed an important concept that you seemed to allude to throughout your video, that being that the observers have free will and the experiments are random. Superdeterminism also still seems to be a clean solution to the entire problem, that being the randomness of the experiments and the free will of the experimenters might not exist. I would love to see a video with your thoughts on Superdeterminism. Thanks again for the great video :)
@dimitrispapadimitriou5622
@dimitrispapadimitriou5622 Год назад
The nobelist Zeilinger and his team used the frequency of photons from distant stars to adjust the measuring devices ( 2017), and another subsequent experiment used distant quasars. So, the "free will loophole" is totally implausible. Moreover, local theories cannot explain the correlations in the experimental results ( that agree with standard QM ) without invoking contrived, infinitely fine tuned initial conditions. That's why most physicists do not take seriously superdeterminism.
@lilydog1000
@lilydog1000 3 года назад
A very lucid description of Bell's Theorem. Many thanks.
@220-tejasagi6
@220-tejasagi6 4 года назад
Professor greene thank u for explaining such a wonderful topic. U made my day. Thank u sir.
@TheYourbox
@TheYourbox Год назад
Professor Greene is way better than I thought reading his books. Cool way to get things across!
@DavidBayerAustria
@DavidBayerAustria 3 года назад
Professor Greene, I really appreciate your video very much. It offers the best explanation for this phenomenon.
@durjoychanda4611
@durjoychanda4611 2 года назад
This goes straight through the head. Can't shake off what I've just learned.
@stevelocke2240
@stevelocke2240 Год назад
That was a great lecture. Thank you. You’re an excellent teacher.
@anthonyehrenzweig1635
@anthonyehrenzweig1635 Год назад
One of the best explanations of what I have never understood properly
@SicilianDefence
@SicilianDefence 2 года назад
Great video,thanks!
@spiralgold9760
@spiralgold9760 9 месяцев назад
wonderfully explained Professor Greene! I had NDE a few years back, experiencing three flatlines in a twelve hour period, and since recovery, regularly experience the Pauli Effect, as well as much Jungian synchronicity…been a fan of Bell’s inequality ever since I read Fritjof Capra and the work of the Fundamental Fysiks Group, which has all helped me maintain a semblance of sanity since I awoke from the coma!
@sergenemo3493
@sergenemo3493 2 года назад
A very accessible explanation. Thank you.
@JamesLDurham
@JamesLDurham Год назад
Thanks 🙏 I was looking for this explanation.
@coled2270
@coled2270 Год назад
Thanks for your talk. I loved the explanation. Thank you
@amreshyadav2758
@amreshyadav2758 4 года назад
professor you just nailed this. you are an awesome educator. looking forward to have something on quantum eraser experiment.
@theshowman8478
@theshowman8478 3 года назад
My head is ringing like a bell now (pun intended). I'm going to calm down now and ponder. Professor Greene, this is wonderful ! Thank You.
@mr.markusi
@mr.markusi Год назад
best explanation so far! finally i understood :D ...many thanks 👍👍👍
@matsleandersson1243
@matsleandersson1243 3 года назад
I think I finally(!), years and years too late, got it :). Thanks. A great presentation.
@kevinmccarthy8746
@kevinmccarthy8746 3 года назад
THANK YOU , Pro Green Great fun you cleared up the entanglement, I did not know that the particles were in flux between spinning up or spinning down .
@mikehoops
@mikehoops Год назад
What an amazing science communicator Prof Green is. Thank you for sharing your insights into this fascinating intellectual discussion that has been ongoing since the last millennium.
@aleksandrserebryanskiy7253
@aleksandrserebryanskiy7253 4 года назад
Thanks! You ere my best author!! Clear, as usual.
@limtae
@limtae 3 года назад
Trying for weeks to get my head around Bell's inequality. This one finally did it for me.
@etsat1
@etsat1 Год назад
great explanation of this subject
@HakWilliams
@HakWilliams Год назад
So careful and step by step. Kudos 👏 💐 🥳 🎊
@darshnaik06
@darshnaik06 Год назад
Thank you Brian greene. Great explanation
@cosmicnomad8575
@cosmicnomad8575 2 года назад
Wow! That’s so elegant! Definitely an inspiration!
@woody7652
@woody7652 4 года назад
Thank you, Brian.
@robertwalker2173
@robertwalker2173 Год назад
Excellent! Thank you.
@darwinlaluna3677
@darwinlaluna3677 Год назад
Thank YOU my friend
@jl8217
@jl8217 24 дня назад
Great lecture, thanks!
@yuvalmeir3253
@yuvalmeir3253 5 месяцев назад
Dear prof. Green your lecture is magnificent , it’s explains the most unintuitive result in such bright way we’re all just speechless. THANK YOU
@igor.t8086
@igor.t8086 Год назад
Thanks, Brian; you’ve just given me an idea how to emulate/simulate a 3-axis spin of my axiomatic virtual particles in my “gedanken simulation” of 3D digital color space… 👍
@user-eb4fc5wg2i
@user-eb4fc5wg2i 4 года назад
I love you Prof. Greene for Spreading scientific knowledge in this Trumponian Dark Age. I'm a biology student and you showed me the wonderful world of physics!
@Milletrulli
@Milletrulli Год назад
Wow!! Best explanation of Bell‘s Theorem and non locality I‘ve heard ever!
@carlesmicro
@carlesmicro Год назад
Brilliant explanation!!!! Thank you!!
@dougiemacd9622
@dougiemacd9622 27 дней назад
Just watched this thru for the second time, and it really explains the logic and 'dilemma' brilliantly. Where the EPR view could potentially be an over-simplification, I would suggest the underlying nature of entanglement to be as an oscillating dialogue between the pair of particles - as opposed to a single communication or signal prompted by measurement. Either way, of course, the Bell tests as conducted appear to strongly demonstrate against locality and the EPR proposals. Of course there still remain the potential loopholes as covered by you in detail Brian. Of these, I'd suggest the most compelling might be those based around the assumptions or premises of the Bell tests - not all of which may be as reliable or as airtight as our reasoning may appear to demonstrate. Fascinating topic!
@stephenjones796
@stephenjones796 4 года назад
Dr. Greene- Uhh WOW. Thank you 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
@tonyscalise4462
@tonyscalise4462 Год назад
What a brilliant explanation! Thank you.
@khalidqureshi1662
@khalidqureshi1662 Год назад
Excellent explanation!
@mh_bg6869
@mh_bg6869 Год назад
🌹🌹🌹 Golden Like - Thanks For Sharing 💖💖💖
@Awesomes007
@Awesomes007 3 года назад
Great talk, thanks. I always assumed that Einstein agreed that the two particles were in superposition, but that they were just shown to be in opposite states when finally measured. It’s interesting that Einstein believed they had definite properties from creation.
@Killane10
@Killane10 5 месяцев назад
I am fascinated with quantum physics and am loving your really well explained videos❤❤❤
@zane62135
@zane62135 Год назад
Thank you. Great explanation!
@srb20012001
@srb20012001 3 месяца назад
Brian is so good at this. Great popularization.
@michaelzumpano7318
@michaelzumpano7318 Год назад
I learned so much more about the EPR paradox from your description, than I did from studying the math. I say that grudgingly, but as a compliment. How did you get to the end without playing the super determinism card?
@CheatOnlyDeath
@CheatOnlyDeath Год назад
Seems he just ignored it
@stevemuller8320
@stevemuller8320 Год назад
superdeterminism is even spookier than "spooky action at a distance" - maybe the last straw Calvinists are clutching at 🤭
@adityajha9665
@adityajha9665 4 года назад
QM, hidden variables , EPR paradox I love them.
@stefanoromagnoli9891
@stefanoromagnoli9891 2 года назад
this explanation is a gift to all of us, it's as brilliant as Bell's theorem!
@pandabearguy1
@pandabearguy1 4 года назад
More mathematical one, but could you try to do something on the amazing theorem of quadratic reciprocity?
@josemariodelapiedra611
@josemariodelapiedra611 Год назад
JUST EXCELLENT , THANKS
@lilagraham6481
@lilagraham6481 3 года назад
Totally brilliant presentation. I didn't expect to understand Bell (on any level) anytime soon. I was wrong!
@wuwenji18
@wuwenji18 3 года назад
Nice talk!
@NejiBHTahar
@NejiBHTahar Год назад
Well done.. Thank you.
@demetrisnicolaides1544
@demetrisnicolaides1544 4 года назад
Fantastic! Thanks!
@muhammadjahanzaibakram
@muhammadjahanzaibakram Год назад
One of the Exellent explaination of Bell's inequalities on RU-vid
@ggrthemostgodless8713
@ggrthemostgodless8713 Год назад
I think you're great... every time I dont understand half of what you explain (but it his not on you, it is me) but I can never stop listening and watch the whole thing even if I got to come back to it later. I'll never be a physicist but I love hearing you Greene and Sean Carroll speak... I love the concepts that I understand only half way, but I dislike the math in it, so I take you guys' word for it that all you say has been mathematically and experimentally verified.
@barneyronnie
@barneyronnie 6 месяцев назад
Thank you!
@status_song808
@status_song808 4 года назад
Sir could you give lectures related to space relation with time and clear concept of light waves.
Далее
Your Daily Equation #22: 8 - 2 ÷ 2 x 3 + 4 = ?
12:24
Your Daily Equation #1: E = mc2
25:17
Просмотров 200 тыс.
УТОПИЯ ШОУ В КИНО
2:36:54
Просмотров 285 тыс.
Китайка и Шашлычок😂😆
00:19
Просмотров 216 тыс.
CatNap in the cartoon Luca😈
00:16
Просмотров 3,1 млн
Is Quantum Reality in the Eye of the Beholder?
31:21
Просмотров 74 тыс.
Beyond Einstein: Gravitational Echoes
35:33
Просмотров 73 тыс.
КЛИЕНТ СЛОМАЛ НАУШНИКИ ? 😳
0:51