3:17 Reminds me of the famous Quincy Jones anecdote: in the 'Thriller' sessions, he always brought a nasty, cheap mono transistor radio-type speaker into the studio for playback. "It's got to sound good on that- that's how the majority of people will be listening to this".
I love the way the Master splits the hairs. Cocking his head to one side to discern the difference in the frequencies. And he has this amazing assistant, who is always there to fill in the gaps! I wish I could afford an assistant like that...
Cheers for this from a retired mastering engineer! I had my NS10M's in this orientation on my personal desktop for years, and got nothing but grief from my contemporaries. About a year ago, I relocated my home studio to a larger room, and relegated my Yamahas to monitors stands off the desktop and in the customary horizontal position. Having them further apart has improved imaging, but this has to do with the fact they are slightly farther apart, not the orientation. Yamaha is correct. It does not matter a whit or a tiddle if they are vertical or horizontal. Just keep them off of a flat surface in either case. I also added a 1 octave step graphic EQ that allowed me to give them a nice 'HiFi' or loudness curve. In close proximity as designed, with this addition, reveals the little units are capable of surprising bass response, and there is no need to cover the tweeters in toilet paper. 😁 A simple flip of the switch allows me to go from flat to sweet. This has also pretty much eliminated the need for multiple monitor pairs. My primary use for these speakers in my personal studio is for archiving my analog library and restoring or remastering much of the same for 96 khz 24 bit wave. And the occasional multitracking for myself of 'backing tracks', something I have done since the 80's in order to perform 'live' without a band. I retired in 2018 after my company closed it's media division as far as in-house production and mastering after 22 years with them. All's well as ends better, as I am having far more fun being retired and working on my own projects! Cheers again!
Wonderful super cool comment! So nice you can make those bad boys all that! It took me a bit to get used to the Yamaha monitors but once I did all worked out nicely. I am glad you are able to just have fun now. Nice.
@@VintageGearMan Cheers! It has always been a passion of mine, going back to my very young audiophile days, before I had a full grasp of mastering. The NS10M's have been my fave for quite some time. Before that it was JBL 4311's. My reasoning for remastering my analog material is to maximize what is already there a bit. This was why they used to put EQ controls on HiFi amps. Not all recordings are created equal. My latest project was to archive my small but eclectic collection of 45's. I started buying singles at age 8 in 1962. All have survived better than anticipated, but I was able to restore many I thought to be lost causes. About 500 records in all. I am digging into to my inherited stacks of 45's now, and moving onto my 78's as well. I'm using a Technics SP15 with Audio Technica ATP-12T tonearm (vastly underrated arm!) I have about 10 carts in rotation with various stylus options. I have done some conservation work in conjunction with the Cal State University system and the Smithsonian, so I may have picked up a thing or two. 😉 I just turned 70, can still hear north of 15 khz and have no desire to take on any revenue work. 😁
I still use my father's KEF Cantors from 1975. He used them high up horizontally, I use them in a small room now vertically. The KEF logo on the front rotates to match the orientation 😊
I’ve recently come across your videos (and subscribed!), and I am heartened by your willingness and ability to examine the fine details of sound reproduction while still reminding us that all of this-ALL of this-is subjective. If I mount my studio monitors in the attic pointing down through air vents into my studio because I like the way it sounds, that is good enough. If I like the way it sounds, it’s good. If I don’t, it’s bad. Far too many people throw around the word “objectively” in these discussions. You don’t, and I love that.
Your comment reminds me of years ago when I saw someone's reasonably decent speakers placed tightly into the corners of their room. All wrong in theory as they excite more standing waves. Except it sounded really good, the main point being that you could be anywhere in the room and it sounded good, rather than just one 'sweet spot' listening position. I wouldn't say this is good for monitoring, but for enjoying music it's an option. DM
I always mount NS-10s the way they are mounted in this video. The bass response should be slightly better when mounted vertically as well as the phase coherence between the woofer and tweeter, as already stated. Combine all that with keeping the tweeters on the outside and the sound will image better across the stereo spectrum. Now, all of this is probably more or less subtle, but I personally like to have things set up as correct as possible.
It depends on your height position of your ears. Your ears should be somewhere between the LF and the HF. If turning the speakers upside down fits this height, do so.
@@carlosoliveira-rc2xt No. It's tweeters out. And it doesn't reproduce sub frequencies but it does reproduce bass, especially when using a high quality, relatively powerful amplifier. Even Auratones can sound remarkably full, for what they are, with a good amp. And if I can find the detailed write up on the NS10s, explaining why they have a slightly more full response when mounted vertically, and why it's more beneficial to have the tweeters out, I'll link it.
@@TheMicrophoneChannel As I have stated, the speakers have no appreciable bass, no one but perhaps you denies this. What the speaker has is an exaggerated mid which can easily be manipulated by close proximity to any large surface. As for imaging, preferences aside, speakers always image better with tweeters in and it's common knowledge in the audiophile community. As I also stated, IF the speaker had bass orientation wouldn't matter. What you are talking about is mid/ crossover/ tweeter dispersion which is greater greater in most vertically oriented speakers so yes there will be a difference in orientation which is why we don't orient vertically designed speakers in a horizontal position. I hope this clears up my statement and position on the matter.
near all that have a NS 10) have a NS 10 as additional speaker to check or a mixcube to hear how it sound on a low quality system. but they have a linear studio monitor as main mixing speaker. audiophile i think nonsense, hearing work adaptive. you need compare . when hear longer a dull sound (reduce high freq with eq) it sound after some time brighter and nice. when switch then to original sound, it seem original sound is much brighter .you only need correct your speakers with EQ that left and right channel sound simular. this is most important for good stereo sound image
LOL Paul McCartney, how lucky to have your audience think of Paul when you talk and what a wonderful job of recording the Beatles did for the music industry. keep up the good work!
Ideally, the tweeters should be at ear level for your listening position. Pick the most suitable mount orientation and angle using isolation to create triangle between ears and tweeters. That should get you close to the studio's listening position ie the track will sound closest to how it was intended.
Nothing better than listening to a true subject matter expert debunking folklore from the unwashed masses. Please keep it up. The truth needs to see the light of day. Cheers
You are just... awesome. Enjoy your content for it's analytical side, humor, and education points. Your video where you show the DAW noise floor doesn't exist was excellent as well.
Great video. About monitors that have waveguides for the tweeters, many companies design their monitors to turn the tweeter 90 degrees so you can use them horizontally instead of vertically (ADAM Audio for example, not all models!!) without compromising the sound dispersion. About near field monitors in general, they are for monitoring at close proximity (1 meter or less). A small benefit of this concept is that the room acoustics are less noticeable because the sound only has to travel a distance of 1 meter at maximum to reach your ears. I don’t say that room isolation and treatment is unnecessary, it will benefit the sound for the better. It’s a sort of hack for people that don’t have a proper treated studio environment/room.
My speakers are also installed horizontally. And I also used a pink noise to adjust my system using a Real time analyzer and a graphic equalizer to correct the deficiencies in my system as well as the acoustics of my room. It makes a big difference. My amplifier is an Electrocompaniet from the 80s.
I loved listening to my mom's albums in the '70s and she had a wide ranging taste in music. She had Led Zepplin next to Arlow Guthrie... Nate King Cole... Johnny Cash... Fifth Dimension... Donavan, etc. She had an all in one consul (speakers, turn table, 8-track, radio).
Time alignment (tweeters & woofers to your ears) is a HUGE factor to hearing detail objectively, as you alluded to towards the end. And the more drivers in a speaker cabinet, the more difficult that can be. We're subconsciously actually more sensitive to phase response than to pitch.
We are sensitive to phase differences left and right for evolutuonary reasons ( where does the lion come from?), vertically not so much as it will only result in a slightly different frequency response.
I have an old pair of AR18's that are really useful for checking - kind of the precursor to NS10s as portable Hifi for mixing. I mostly work on my Genelec 1030a but they are a little 'veiled' in the upper mid at the crossover point even though excellent for me everywhere else. The AR show me that area perfectly - not to mention have a tight bass. Thanks for re-emphasising the phase aspect - I find speakers on their side super wide and weird, but thats me.
The first component HiFi system I heard was with a pair of AR-1 in 1969. My neighbor had the system and I was 14 yrs old. He played the best music on them too. Sgt Peppers, Simon and Garfunkel - Bookends, Are You Experienced. Those speakers sounded so good to me then. :)
NS10's are the most critical speakers in my experience and was pleasantly surprised to hear him say what I learned 20+ years ago: If you can make your mix sound good on NS10's, then your mix will sound good on anything. This is why you'll notice most major recording studios had a pair of NS10's in them...
"If you can make your mix sound good on NS10's, then your mix will sound good on anything" This is a myth created just because they were kind of standard in studios. It is the skills of the person that matters, not the speakers. Room and environment is the most critical, then the skills....
@@rabarebra Hi, you seem to be misunderstanding my remark. NS10's are not just popular, they are critical in the sense that instead of pumping your mix through large JBLs, portable boom boxes, and running outside to your car to check your mix, if you get NS10's to sound good (obviously using your skills/ear because it's not easy), there's not much need to check the other monitors.
@@ShabbyBroom I am not a newbie but a engineer. Where did I mention any use of large speakers only? NS10's are not critical to use. There are a bunch of speakers on the market you can use along with larger speakers to check your mixes. Cheers from a Mastering engineer whom like to be anonymous.
Industry standard forever! However, I have a pair EV's that never let me down. Anything I threw at them sounded great on any gear. That blew me away to. I even had a seasoned engineer listen to them and he was very impressed also.
In addition to the "mids microscope" aspect of NS10s, I always understood the the main reason for having them is that virtually every pro studio on earth has them, and they thus serve as a reliable reference point for engineers who know them well. Great for mixing vocals. I wouldn't use them exclusively (I also have Genelecs), but mine have magic dust on them...I got them from the Townhouse studios (via funky junk) with a Quad 520f. Be Well.
For many years I used a pair of Canton Quinto510 Loudspeakers....and they did the job very well. Combined with my AKG K240 Studio headphones I think I was pretty good prepared to mix and record audio. I used my monitors so long and so intensive that I imediately identified any mistake in mix or recording. I knew exactly what I should be hearing. Since 3 years I changed to a pair of Yamaha HS 7 studio monitors and still I don't feel as secure and confident as I did on my (very old) Cantons. I guess it has to be some more years of matching my ears to the new monitors..... To conclude: I think you just need to KNOW WHAT YOU HEAR. And be able to make the right decisions from that knowledge. Great video, as always! Thank you very much!
I agree with all the points you made, which matches my own experience. Like you I like mine stiff and errect....the monitors that is. If anyone wishes to get horizontal that is their private business!
👌👌 As it is, if you listen to the final mix well on an NS10, it will turn out well everywhere, especially if the product is for radio or television stations. Years ago, almost all the studios where I have recorded had these speakers and they were placed both horizontally and vertically. Many studios had another couple of boxes to listen to after the product was finished. Greetings.
Having worked myself with a couple of NS10, I wouldn´t overlook the problem with frequency response as if it was a minor issue. Those dips and bumps in the highs may become a challenge when looking for a tonal balance. It´s not only a question of having the mix sounding "good" in the yamahas, it´s also about mixin while you are aware of which frequencies are boosted by this response, and which are atennuated. A complete mess of perception, in my opinion. I never got to feel comfortable with these. I have enjoyed some of the latest Genelec models, and my final choice for mixing has been Neumann KH120 + Kh750dsp- Measuring my mixing room and getting an "almost flat" response, at least in terms of tonal balance perception, adding an extended bass response down to 16Hz, finally got me having my mixes translate in many other places with much less struggle. The Neumanns offer a rather boring sound when you use them simply for listening to other music, but are surprisingly revealing in showing hidden details in records I had listened to a thousand times. The kind of tool that helps you to take decisions and achieve your goal sooner, and more confident.
Also vertical orientation helps keeping the tweeter more or less at the same height as your ear, which is important for high frequencies (which are directional). So it would help with clarity and stereo imaging. And nice speakers BTW :D
I remember when the NS10M first appeared mid 1980s, as I recall their biggest selling point was that an NS10 sounded like an NS10 in almost every studio they were used in. This was the era of the freelance sound/mix engineer, who could be working in almost any studio from day to day. Other popular near field speakers seemed to interact with the room more thus sounded subtly different in different studios. The NS10 did not sound as accurate as other speakers but the sound was consistent so he/she had a known reference. The original NS10M had an acoustic material speaker ‘grill’, but engineers always took it off. The result was the speaker was very slightly bright, which lead to people putting a sheet of tissue paper over the tweeter. This lead to a discussions of how many sheets, what brand etc. It sounds mad but it happened! I remember one of the Lord-Alge brothers (sorry can’t remember which one) who said the NS10 only “sounded right” when it was so loud it was “farting” ie the bass driver hitting the end stop. Needless to say the bass drivers needed replacing very often when he was mixing. But his mixes sounded great so who am I to judge.
They used to replace the NS10 woofers every single day at A&M (Now Henson) studios. There was an aftermarket here in LA for less financially blessed studios, for cheaper than new NS10 woofers.
@@MobiusMinded we did mot replace them every day, but we had a big stock of spare drivers & swapped out when tired, the engineer/producer requested or when they inevitably died.
@@peters7949 ahh… I was at The Village at the time and this was the rumor. We swapped the out all the time too. Let’s not forget the “Fuse vs Non Fused” tweeter debate.
@@MobiusMinded I don’t recall the tweeter fuse debate, perhaps it was more of a USA issue. We did have Urei 813A main monitors in 3 of our studios; they had, what looked like light bulbs, in series with the drivers. They were actually Barretter resistors en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barretter. These glowed if the speakers were driven too hard, increasing their resistance & thus protecting the driver. They also served as a warning that they were too loud. These would blow from time to time & were much easier to replace than a driver. I recall a small JBL speaker in the 90s that had a similar device inside, that when driven too hard you could see, though the bass port, illuminating the inside of the speaker.
I've ben using my original 1978 Yamaha NS10s as main monitor for maybe 10 years now. I used them on 4 or 5 places since I bought them, and half of the time I've used them vertical, as they're supposed to be. The other half of the time(and right now) I'm using them horizontally. Never been able to hear a difference in response or performance. In other monitors I had with horns, the difference was obvious instantly when you flip them. People saying that the orientation is wrong, clearly doesn't know what they're talking about, and of course never used their ears(or had a pair of NS10s hahaha)
Very well explained article. I'm still using 30 year old tannoy 609 mk2s , dial concentric speakers and I dont think that it would make any difference to the sound whichever way they were orientated as long ss the center of the driver Is about head height. Lots of studios used tannoys for this reason. Easy to set up and consistent in quality.
@@AudioMasterclass I do realise that there is a huge difference between studio monitors and domestic speakers from the same manufacturer. I also understand the shape and size of the room your system is in has a huge effect on the sound. Our rooms here in the UK are generally a lot smaller than those in the USA. . This does influence the choices I have regarding loudspeakers I can accommodate. And my rooms are larger than the average.
Before I lost my hearing upper register the monitor's tweeters always had to be square-on perpendicular & equidistant. Vertical has advantage I find better viewing through controlroom window
Never noticed the resemblance to Paul until you mentioned it, but damn, don't know how I didn't observe it. BTW, I employ the 1st iteration of B&G's dipole, push-pull, planar magnetic, RD-57 built by Dave Graebener at Speakerlab, before B&G Corp was formed. It features a 54 inch long by 2 inch wide, diaphragm, 4 turn voice coil for Frequencies above 200Hz. Could never imagine them not vertical.
I am glad you got the path changes right. Since there are 2 drivers not one, your movement will change the length of the sound has to travel, and since you rarely move up and down but a lot side to side, a vertical orientation is better (as with 99% of speakers) Though your best bet is to place the speakers fruther away, if you can, and such problems get a lot less prominent.
Thank you for your comment, which I appreciate. Regarding placing the monitors further away, this would contradict their use as nearfield monitors. Even so, the best distance will depend largely on the room. DM
Further away, no. They should be in a 30 degree axis with a joint just behind your back head. Then that axis hits your ears. The height is crucial, so flip them upside down if you want, horizontal or vertical, just make sure you got that axis right and tweeter and woofer right in the sweet-spot of each your ear (ear in the middle between woofer and tweeter).
We used to tape some tissue paper over the tweeters , they are very bright and fatiguing sounding speakers and are supposed to represent the average hifi speaker on the home . That was back in the late 80s early nineties. Horrid speakers , pretty much every studio had them . Thnx Eric McCartney 🙏🏼⭐️🥁
I use my (upright) NS10s (hooked up to an old Alesis amp) for two reasons: in mono for balancing (theyre ruthless when balance is wrong or when wide sounds are not in phase), and to check if my bass is still there on smaller speakers (if not, I usually add a bit of distortion to bass in parallel to bring it up on smaller speakersets). Double checking on NS10's has saved me numerous times
If it sounds good on the Yamaha, music will sound good on any speaker because the Yamaha NS 10’s have a reverse fletcher munson curve. Not my idea, Eric Alexander from Tekton speakers said that. And that makes sense.
That has always been said of NS 10s. The speaker so lackluster that if it sounds good on them it'll sound better on anything else. I don't think they were even Studio Monitors originally. It's just that so many engineers and producers were using them as near fields that Yamaha jumped on the Band Wagon and started putting that on the front. The HS series are flatter, though not much better. But eventually White Coned Yamahas were ubiquitous in studios. So much so, that if they weren't in your studio, people questioned whether it was Pro, so of course I have them. And they look so cool. But, of course, I have to hear my mixes on a Jambox and in the car, headphones, etc... to really know what's going on. It was ever thus. Cassettes for the ride home.
We've never seen all three of them in the same room, have we? We couldn't even trust a photo of them together at Abbey Road, he could have had his AI assistant stitch their pictures together.
It might be strange but I got some Monsoon metal highs, pretty good mids and the subwoofer is even pretty good too! I got this for $4.99 at a garage sale! One of the channels connections was hosed but it only took about 2 mins to get the pins straight and I plugged it in! I thought I must be nuts but it sounds good! LOL I've got some good monitors and headphones but I still use these Monsson's for anything media on my PC!
I've turned speakers backwards! In the musical instrument business, you're producing, not reproducing. My instruments were organs and carillons. Both sounds have a large indirect component. "Speakers forward" often gave too much direct sound. It certainly puzzled a lot of customers, but they couldn't argue with the sound.
I used to work at a local radio station. For that I once had a workshop making jingles at the NOB. working in the studios of the public broadcaster. Equipment that makes you salivate as a local radio station technician. Made super cool jingles, you know how those things sound. But the tip of the NOB technician was that you can make a very nice final mix on this equipment. But if you can't follow it on a transistor radio, it makes no sense. So a speaker from an old cheap radio was literally connected to the mono bus. "If it sounds good on that, and can be followed, it's good"
absolutely love ns10s, with a good amp like a bryston they sound much better than people say. I have actually not heard a speaker that I like the transient response as much as these, ns10s feel fast and tight and i really like the papery sound. I feel the papery sound is so much more natural than for example dynaudios or Atc with different material for the cone. I also much prefer the sound of a closed enclosure to ported speakers. Also the lack of sub helps me focus on the midrange in the mix. Ns10s just work for me, but may not work for other people tough, there is definitely a learning curve also. There is also something with 2-way speakers that i find sound less plastic/phasy than 3-way speakers. They may not sound flattering to clients, but they help me make much better mixes than I did with other speakers. The only thing that matters in the end is how the mix sounds outside the studio ofc.
@@MariJu1ce I didn’t know that about Serban, though he’s mixed a few things I’ve done. Rick Rubin would always bring in a pair. Of course you want a really good amp. Bryston 4b, or equivalent.
I have a unique situation where my speakers are sitting directly on a tile floor upside down with the super tweeters and tweeters in my 4-way Sansui speakers are only inches from the floor. I had to do this because I have a 150" pulldown theater screen and it blocks the speakers except for the bottom 8" which is unobstructed. So they still sound good during movies as the fronts, I have compensated for the strange layout with my 30 band EQ's so I get great sound even with screen down.
My dad worked at the Rank Wharfedale factory in Idle, Bradford in the early to mid 1970s. At home back then we had a LEAK 2000 amp with Wharfedale Denton 2XP (1971 - 1973) speakers. Lovely sound although not audiophile.
NS10 in whatever flavour with or without the tweeter covered with tissue paper, if good enough for Bob Clearmountain then should be good enough for the rest of us as a reference. Great video as always.
I prefer reference monitors to be positioned or mounted vertically like yours. That puts the time alignment at the speaker's crossover point to be more in alignment. No I do not raise my wiring off the floor.
My everyday home speakers are an old pair that had been stored in the loft for over twenty years. They were a bit dusty when I got them out, but cleaned up nicely, and sound fine for enjoying music. I can even hear them when I am cooking things in the kitchen. 🙂 Great video; tells it like it is!
You stated it right, they are reference speakers, I have different types on my desk, even small pc speakers. Because the music that you master must sound "great" on smaller devices too, and if I want to test the material wonderful, then I go to my car, that's also a reference. With the years you learn these techniques.
Wasn't it Phil Spector who always played the final mix through a cheap 3-inch speaker, to make sure the song worked on the speaker most people would first hear it on (the car or a handheld transistor radio)? Or am I mixing him up with some other producer from that era?
I listen to my old budget JBL monitors vertical. They even made it to where you could twist the JBL logo 90 degrees in which to accommodate this. I have 9 pairs of speakers that I use in rotation, or set up in multiple systems in my home at times, all of which are wrong. Been listening near field for 50+ years by now, starting with the suitcase Victrola arranged on the floor when I was a lad, with 45s scattered allover the rug. That close-up listening habit followed me throughout life, even when the equipment became much larger.
Nice video. I have the same speakers. I used to have them horizontal but have recently been experimenting with them in vertical position while I'm in the process of moving my studio round. People always comment that I've got them set up wrong but as you point out - They can be used both ways. I've found out the expensive way that it's important to drive these with a decent amp with plenty of power. Replacement drivers aren't cheap, or even easy to find.
@@AudioMasterclass I thought that the "over-driven amplifier blowing tweeters" thing was a myth, though I've seen it stated many times in various books on loudspeaker design and home audio. If it's true, shouldn't Metallica's "Death Magnetic" album be blowing tweeters? Ordinary guitar distortion effects are produced by clipping the waveform, yet I never hear about loud guitar music blowing tweeters. I've read about tests which found that the harmonics produced by clipping aren't powerful enough to blow tweeters. The logical thing to do is to buy an amplifier which is powerful enough that you don't need to set the volume near maximum for whatever your listening conditions and preferences are, and buy speakers with a power rating that can handle the maximum power from that amplifier.
You do consider lobing in the crossover regionand yes diagonal would fix that offset in theory! Also edge diffraction will be different I suspect vertical mount gives a more consistent dispersion through the treble. Fascinating stuff. No wrong really all speakers are terrible with square waves anyway
"...really all speakers are terrible with square waves anyway..." True, however, some are less terrible than others. And I believe the difference is audible.
I really enjoyed your commentary, and I agree with you. I have developed the notion that I want my speakers to sound the same way the orchestra sounds if I was sitting in front of the orchestra live. I don't want enhanced lo or high end, I don't want any coloration. I just want the speakers to be flat and pure and give the same sound that I'd hear if I was sitting directly in front of the performers. Is that wrong? There are discussions about having the tweeters farthest in toward center, and the woofers toward the outside... but I'm not sure I have an opinion about that. Nor do I have an opinion about vertical or horizontal positioning. I just want my monitors (I use Yamaha HS5 monitors) to sound clean and accurate. I do voice over from a home studio, and I want my narrations to be crisp and clear, but not overdone. I think having accurate speakers is a big part of that.
Someone one bought a bass guitar from a Music shop and was really impressed. So i went to the music shop and mentioned that someone I knew had bought a bass guitar from them and it was great and they were happy, And the shop assistant chirped up and was clearly proud to hear about a happy customer, then I said I was confused, I didnt realize there was such a thing as a bass guitar that didnt sound good..... The speakers a fine, Our heads are all wrong....
My monitors are flat within 4 db from 18 hz to well beyond 20khz ( tweeters go to 45k) in my room, but if I want to hear just the midrange, I put a highpass and lowpass on my mix to see how it sounds.
Another brilliant video :) Misunderstanding tends to breed misinformation, which is often disseminated by well-meaning amateurs: those whose knowledge of a subject is sketchy are always prey to the intuitively plausible but utterly wrong explanation for one phenomenon or another. You can place it however you want. Why? Because NS10 began its life as a domestic hi-fi speaker in '78, but it was relatively poorly received and quickly faded towards obscurity. Later on, in the mid '80's after few mixing engineers used it, Yamaha decided to re-brand it 'NS10M Studio'. That's it. Nothing "magic". Use it, do mixes and be happy🙂
Omg, who didn't knew these SUPER basic reasons, can say don't know a damn about speakers in general and sound. Still amazed you had to explain these reasons. This was a hard one😂 🤦🏻♂️
LOL! Apparently you underestimate the determination of youtube commenters! I might have gone on at length to explain that the relationship between the two drivers to themselves and to the baffle does not change when the speaker is rotate. And I would like to note that if I stood on my head while listening to the speakers in their "correct" orientation, they would still sound the same! It's good to be thorough! :)
I always thought that Yamaha's NS speaker series was well reviewed and considered very good sound. As Yamaha receivers in the 1970's/80's had a "clinical" (dry?) sound I guess they wanted similar results in their speakers. Personally, I agree with Yamaha and prefer amps with that sound. I've found my Hitachi SR-804 (1979) has that sound. Clinical or accurate and very desirable to me. At least thru my Ohm model L and H loudspeakers.
Good evening Mr Mellor. I am blessed with a pair of stacked Quad ESLs (aka ESL 57s.) A friend once told me that the bass response on these was totally crap. I know these speakers have their limitations, but the frequency response from the lower mid-range to the mid high range on these speakers is phenomenal. And that is what I want to hear. Thumping bass has its place, but not in my lounge. I have suspended wooden floors, and pressed steel ceilings and this is definitely not an "audiofoolery good room." But I don't care, because I am hearing the music the way I prefer it. The vocal reproduction is quite incredible albeit female, male, choral pieces et al. Listening to classical music is quite sublime on these speakers, as well as jazz, blues, folk and so on. The lovely deep bass and trilling highs of a pipe organ I will go and listen to in a cathedral, church, auditorium or similar location. Plus, and this is the most important point, I do not have "golden ears" anymore - I have been blighted with permanent tinnitus since 2001. However, I still enjoy my music - from LPs (many of the older ones are not available in a digital format,) CDs and SACDs. I have not had the opportunity to move to high quality streaming. In closing - I really enjoy the way you cut to the chase and call the BS exactly what it is. I do have some slightly more expensive speaker cables in my system than just normal types, but that is because of the change between my Bedini amp and the speakers. The Quads do present a rather different load (capacitive) than normal speakers do, but my cables are no more than studio level Mogami 3082 co-axial which are roughly $5 per metre, and I have a total of 2 x 4m per channel. People will say this is unnecasary but I will refer them to this article (sound-au.com/cablewhitepaper.htm) that explains the reasons for using this cable with the ESLs. Thank you for always interesting topics. All the best from a chilly South Africa. My speakers are wonderful. Wrong for most but good for me.
I used to yearn to have stacked Quads but of course I couldn't afford them. Now I could, but I realise how much space is needed to get them to sound at their best. I guess I'll have to stick with my B&Ws. DM
@@AudioMasterclass Indeed space is needed, and my lounge is fortunately just large enough for them. I used the word "blessed" because my best audio/music friend gave me these in 1997 at the then giveaway price of £630.
Damn those NS10 grot boxes. I`m glad they are no longer a standard. That being said, your ears get used to what they get used to, so I`m not going to yuck your yum. Many a solid mix has been done with NS10`s as part of the process.
I've definitely notied the Paul resemblance. Eric Idle... That's a bit of a stretch. _Eh? Eh? Know what I mean? Know what I mean? Nudge, nudge! Say no more!_
As long as the tweeters are at ear level, you can mount them any which way... Using them vertically, as you said, allows the listener to move horizontally and not have any phase/freq. response problems. Since we normally don't move our heads up and down when listening but do normally move a little left or right, you will get the most accurate response using them vertically... Just don't stand up... LOL... I have Kali Audio LP-6 monitors which are becoming the budget standard and very accurate for the money...
My dear sir listen to whatever you want to listen to on whatever speaker you want to listen to it on who are these people I own some of Yamaha studio monitors myself I enjoy my music daily! Enjoy your life who cares what other people think... really!!!
I guess this clears up my confusion about a setup I recently saw in a video (by Andrew Masters) of Tim Pierce's home studio, where he has his Adam Audio S3a monitors placed vertically. Besides the manual mentioning they are supposed to be placed horizontally due to the position of the "woofer-midrange units" - I assume - it's not THAT big of a deal (at least how he uses them). Great channel - superb content! Cheers :)
I don't know of any speakers that look more intentionally horizontal but if there was any reason to mount them vertically I'd certainly give it a try. DM
Al good points, especially about Eric and Paul. But why did Yamaha make these with a left and right orientation? Why is the tweeter offset anyway. If both units were on a central axis to the box it wouldn't matter which was left or right. Two identical speakers would be made symmetrical by turning one upside down.
My guess regarding the tweeter offset, and it is just a guess, is that if the speakers are placed horizontally the tweeter will be higher. Bear in mind that the purpose of placing them horizontally professionally is so as not to obscure the main monitors. Having done this, it makes sense for the pair to be symmetric. DM