Yujin Nagasawa - What is Panpsychism? 

This is a meaningful video, and the debate is worth appreciating. This is definitely one step forward in the right direction. May be a long way to go but ultimately, we will find the truth.

It doesn't look as many little bits of consciousness, because each bit perceives individually. It's easy to prove by the case of people who got their brains split. Even if two parts of the same person starts to behave independently, neither part feels much of the difference. Each hemisphere works like it worked before but unable to coordinate their movements. These are still the same parts of the same person.

Dr. Donald Hoffman, Dr. Bernard Carr, Dr. Iain McGilchrist, and Dr. Rupert Sheldrake are among a growing body of scientists that also subscribe to the philosophy of #panpsychism rather than that of #physicalism.

Panpsychism is a fascinating, deeply respectful concept. Though, how does his hypothesis differ from the hypothesis of God?

I love how hard they panned this panpsychism video. I only had one headphone on and could only hear half the convo🤣

Panpsychism is an intriguing concept when you consider all living things show a similar disruption of function under the influence of general anesthetics.

Creating more unknowns without learning the basic one. Just because we don't know how matter acquire consciousness when it comes together, it doesn't mean other things(conciouss particles, conciouss Universe). Maybe this is the case and we just don't know how exactly it works. Assuming that the particles or the entire cosmos has consciousness is a stretch, but also I can not falsify.

This is derived from the Organic view of the Cosmos from Taoism. 🙏🏼😊

Consciousness being a first person experience, can never be verified. But Conscious behavior on the other hand is very possible. Panpsychism or Cosmic panpsychism or cosmic consciousness can all be behaviors. we can for example say that gravitational pull is possible because there is some level of consciousness in the objects. This is more of a framework to build complex conscious behavior.

Felicitaciones Robert por tu búsqueda profunda e inteligente sobre la verdad de muchos fenómenos fisicos clásicos, quánticos, el significado de la existencia, Dios, el tiempo, realidad, freewill, conciencia y cerebro, religión, filosofía, problemas metafisicos, etc. Te invito a conocer mi teoría del alma y mi teoría de la conciencia. Muchas gracias por tu gran aporte. Saludos. Paper.Vet.Chile

We are the multiverse we claim we can't find what exist is really sheer agreement the love it doesn't register that's the limits of the body when I end would time also no it doesn't exist

Cosmic panpsychism/cosmopsychism suffers from the same problem in reverse (the decombination problem). Also, other problems that characterize monism or mereological problems like how can the whole be prior and more fundamental than the parts. It conflicts with basic common sense and intuition.

The hard problem of consciousness it's hard to define. I was trying very hard to precisely name one thing about consciousness that can't be explained by physical interactions between neurons. But it still feels like there is a problem.

The conscious is the superficial part of the mind which is lighted, and below it lies the unconscious buried in the dark. Then below the unconscious lies the collective unconscious, and at the bottom lies the cosmic unconscious - which is the mind of the entire universe, which is the total mind, the universal mind. Remembrance of God or self-remembering happens at the level of the cosmic mind, which is the ultimate in consciousness. God or self is known when we become completely integrated - not only with our unconscious and collective minds, but also with the cosmic consciousness, which is of the highest. Osho , from the book 'Krishna : The Man And His Philosophy '

1:07 how did that "arrangement" from proto-conscious elements come to be is the question... because arrangement to fot a particular functionality requires a higher level of complexity than the one starting with (the proto consciousness) 🤔

Oh nice. I'm a big believer in this. I think the double slit and entanglement kinda hint at panpsychism being real, too.

cosmic continuous consciousness transcends physical nature in panentheistic universe?

He speaks of the higher mind only the mind receives our experiences

Sometimes speculative nonsense has the tendency to come in layers, pilled up upon layers.

nested vortexes; of infinite layers; of conscious matter;

There is a God… but he didn’t create consciousness. It existed before him, and he arose from it, just like we did. No one owns it or controls it.

continuous cosmic consciousness has subjective feeling / experience? a subjective being or existence external to physical nature, in contrast to human being internal physical body?

human awareness in the present portion of infinite time having continuous (cosmic) consciousness?

What if the agency of life resides more in the process that continuously builds it than in the it that is being built.

This is just religion with extra steps

time might be smooth, continuous?

present time may have awareness?

Particles>Atoms>Molecules,>Organic >Molecules>Biological Cells>Neurons>Neuronal Networks....as you climb the ladder of nature we can say eventfulness or time aka Planck Time Increases. The devil is in the details or how do neuronal networks achieve such huge Planck Times which accompanies emergence?

If you really pay close attention to the visual experience it isn't uniform or smooth.

that I am is the onlything Im certain of...for now. the rest is ...fun n games

Trying to put Zen into a philosophical argument.

He seems to suggest that cosmic c0nsciousness is like a quantum scalar field.

Consciousness isn’t an intellectual construct.

Have you ever heard of Delores Cannon or Abraham Hicks 🤔🤫🤭

How many consciousness do you have in your body? What if there's a roundworm in your gut?🪱 Is there no other consciousness in Zeus's body besides Zeus himself?🌌

Neurosience keep out how knows consciousness. And what about this video. It means nothing in terms consciousness definitions . Because what he show up about consciousness it is wortheless neurosience. Inconsistency with brains reality . Rambling. Absolutetly .

Air fried psychism is healthier The Mystery Man came over An' he said: "I'm outa-site!" He said, for a nominal service charge, I could reach nervonna t'nite If I was ready, willing 'n able To pay him his regular fee He would drop all the rest of his pressing affairs And devote His Attention to me But I said... Look here brother, Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris? Look here brother, Don't you waste your time on me

💪🥷❤🙏☯️

Yujin Nagasawa new fundamental and Absolute Law of Universal Conscious Nature: you can solve the problem of a big stupidity by unleashing a much bigger stupidity.

"What is Panpsychism?" It is not conscious.. it just seems to be conscious... ... because every tiniest particle of matter in this Universe is an extension of God's existence... this is what OMNIPRESENCE means. .. and this is why NO SOUL can hide from the eyes of the Almighty Holy Spirit.

PAN PSYCHOS: Psychos EVERYWHERE.

Do you want to know if the Quran was memorized? I don't believe the Quran was memorized. Do you want to know if muslims lied to you?. I want proof that the Quran was memorized. Islam is dead and you can bury the lie. What would be the future of atheism if atheists continue to refuse to ask for evidence that the Quran was memorized? To not waste this loving poem I say atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. Thank you.

What is Panpsychism? 1. It a fad that will pass. 2. A last attempt at staving off the steady march of physical-ism or more correctly super-naturalism. Dualisms, Idealism, Panpsychism comes and goes, but note that physicalism is a constant and marching forward steadily. Heck, all our modern societies inclusing my ability to write this comment using the wonderful technology of internet, is a fruit of physicalism. Show some grattitude :) 3. Posits something it needs to prove. Does not explain it. 4. Demands from science to explain what electron IS (opposed to what it does), and then refuses to answer what consciousness IS in the same way. Do you think that is fair? 5. Says fundamental particles are "proto" conscious - without saying what that means, and then goes on to say that when many fundamental particles come together in a special configuration the "proto"-consciousness of each some how adds up and gives human like consciousnes - but turns around and refuses to accept the same explanation of the mechanism when given by physicalists. Do you think that is fair? What is good for the goose should be good for the gander, No?

I think the Christians might be right…

Lol no

Don’t forget that consciousness is itself an idea. Panpsychism isn’t science, it’s endless word salad, led by Philip Chopra.