All l can say is thats one crack'in engine. Hope GM bring it out as a Marine Engine as well. Those Heads & Electronics r 1st class as is the fuel injection. Top effort GM
A new big block in 2021? How sweet it is! I'm thinking a simple cam, spring and lifter change, some 110 octane fuel, a aggressive tune and this bad boy will make 1400-1500 horsepower. GM is selling you this with a wink and a smile. They KNOW what you're gonna do. 😁
@@InternalCombustion Is this solid roller, short travel hydraulic roller or standard hydraulic roller? My guess is solid roller. And what's maximum torque? What's the lobe separation on cam? The specs may be in the GMPP Book possibly.
@@LWRC Ngl, a tesla would likely smoke this thing. Yeah it makes plenty of power, but with that amount of weight... you really haven't gained anything.
That's the Chevy Performance crate engine for $30K BluePrint has a fully dressed option 632 @815 horse for under $18K and they dyno each build. If you're willing to spend $30K on an engine you might as well go to Reher Morrison or Nelson Racing where 100% quality American parts are used, chances are Chevy is having their crates built in Mexico and not even dyno'd
I have a friend who bought the Blueprint 632/815 HP version for his 1970 Chevy truck. It blew up within a few months of installation. Also has to run 110 octane fuel in it to prevent detonation.
1000+ HP, 93 octane pump gas, 12:1 cr, hydraulic roller cam and EFI. Suddenly, my 454 powered hot rod needs a new powerplant. Honey, I'm taking out a home equity loan. LOL
@@sethh8892 you must own one then eh? 1000hp on pump gas swill at 12:1…..you’re all dreaming. Gonna just keep knocking the timing out of it until it doesn’t detonate anymore? Yea, I’ll keep dreaming reality.
I would love one in a 68-72 Nova, early 80s Chevy pick up, with 300-450hp extra of nitrous in 2 stages. It would be such a monster with 12.1 CR and that 270/286 .780 .782 cam.
I wish they offered it with a front feed throttle body intake manifold for us crazy people that would like to run this pump gas big block under under a factory style hood.
I have been pretty down on GM for a few years now with the pussified corvette with only 495hp & it looks like China's version of a Ferrari, doesn't look like an American car at all, but this new 632 behemoth is making me change my mind! GM did a good job with the retro looks of the Camaro, I hope they greatly improve the looks of the Vette by doing a retro of a mid 60's Vette! Maybe a 63 split window retrorod?! C'mon GM, you need to do this after you greatly humiliated your super car by looking like a Chinese knock off of a Ferrari! You now have the right engine for it, that's for sure!!
500hp is pussified? Plenty for everyday drivers looking for an affordable American mid engine sports platform which is what they designed. I’m sure the Z06 is trash and you had a stroke when they put a turbo 4 in a full sized truck.
As a Ford guy I’m happy the Chevy camp has stuck to their roots. FOMOCO should be castrated for dropping the 385 BBF. And to push the leaf blower motor in an F150? Puke.
I’m reading all these comments about here what a great engine it is the price came out the other day $40,000 I can build twice the motor for $40,000 for my Camaro I built a 1400 hp capable blower motor on pump gas for $27,000 with much better parts than promax heads,
@@delanteworthy5066 and this one comes with a warranty. lol. Seriously, no one who buys this is going to just run it on pump gas. You'd be leaving a couple hundred horses on the table. 👍
what? a Chevy 632 crate engine pushing 1000HP on 93 octane coming out your Chevy dealer's door? it's getting crazy out there! sO what's next, a 1300HP 800c.i.d. BB with 4 Over Head Cams?
What's the most horsepower you can get out of this motor I am building a 68 Chevy novel I am looking for the most horsepower for my money it's my money I don't mind spending it but I wanted to perform the way it should Please comment back thank you
Well I don’t know the cam specs but in the other video with the Camaro the representative says that there is still room to port the cylinder heads out further. I’d estimate you can make another 200hp NA and probably 400 more if you switched to race fuel and increased the compression. Throw a power adder on here and I don’t think 2000hp is unreasonable
I'd like to replace the 498 in my '01 Silverado 2500hd with this 632, but it will Never Happen Thanks in LARGE PART to the U.A.W!! How Much does G.M. pay to those employed to build this Engine?
I built an 803 hp 565 that was 12,782 $ from carb to oil pan. I think that 1000 could be done using different heads like 18degree AFR for far less than 30gs
CFE has developed a 600 cu.in small block chevy 1000 hp. of course this 632 big block is a chevy engine that is near perfect but its something to hit 10,000 rpm with a sbc
This makes up a bit for not putting a manual in the new Corvette... I think I will just use that money and drop this into my Camaro and have a bit more fun.
Ah ....the smell of a EFI port,632 ci of no replacement for displacement!! Wait....37k dollars!!?? Yea,b a hard pass for us that dont have a youtube channel,or a Motortrend show!
Used to be a company making fiberglass beetle bodies with suicide doors, chopped top, split rear window built on a rectangular tube steel chassis, and mustang two front end. Probably that.
I’ve been hearing people that complain about big engines sucking too much gas for over 50 years now. All I can say is if you can’t afford the gas you can’t afford the engine or the car to put it in, go get a life somewhere else because I’m tired of hearing about it!
I would rather have a 632 cid 10.5 compression 800 HP blueprint motor spraying a 400 shot with 1,200 horse power total. Than a 1000 HP GM 632 cid spraying a 200 shot 1,200 total. Both engines for example 1200 HP total, same torque and RPM for example but the lower compression on Nitrous makes more gain at the track Keep reading I will prove it.. But more nitrous of course is harder on everything over time. But all engines over time are going to wear, tear and break eventually if you don't maintenance, thoroughly check valve train and other parts out. And ideally inspect, tear down and frequently rebuild if needed. A Sonny's Race Engine Mountain Motor 16. 1 + compression running 6.80 in the 1/4 mile in a professional race car. With a 200 lil shot of Nitrous on a efficient Engine as a Sonny's Mountain Motor. Only went to 6.60 ET in the 1/4 after a 200 shot of Nitrous. On motor 6.80 not much gain only 2 tenths in the 1/4 mile on Nitrous. Point is on a pro race engine this efficient you need a big shot of nitrous to make a better bigger gain. A 800-1200+ shot of nitrous to fill a cylinder naturally aspirated already this efficient look at Sonny's Mountain Motor Nitrous Engines. Mostly stock low compression V-8 engines on a cheater plate nitrous 250 shot have made over a 2.00 second + gain in the 1/4 of a mile. If I'm not mistaken I think the best ET gain was a cheater 250 shot nitrous carberator plate system with low compression. Mostly stock a 454 BBC made a 2.60+ gain ET in the 1/4 of a mile on a low compression 8.25 to 1 compression. Bigger engines in general like V-8's mostly stronger larger in size more gains on Nitrous in general and take more nitrous than smaller engines. On another note 2 nearly stock carberated 350 engines for example. One engine 10.5 compression the other at 8.5 compression. The 10.5 compression engine has better fuel mileage on pump gas and more power all the way across the board. Power you can feel. The 8.25 compression engine is lazy and has dead leaky inefficient cylinders hard on gas compared to the 10.5 compression responsive engine. Another example 540 BBC 9.1 compression, flat tappet solid non roller cam. On motor in the 1/8 of a mile ET on motor 7.50 on a 400-500 nitrous kit 5.50 ET. Bigger gains with lower compression on Nitrous than the opposite. Same as boosted engines lower compression more boost bigger gains than higher compression less boost. Hopefully this helps!!!
@@InternalCombustion I'm a business owner and been in the automotive field for over 20 years. Trying to start a you tube channel but can't seem to get it off the ground.
For this price and Naturally Aspirated Sonny's Engines pump gas 925-1700 horse power and up to 950 cid. For more power and race gas 2000 horse power all these are Naturally Aspirated. They also have boosted and nitrous engines. Pro Line engines up to 5,000 Horse Power. More engine builders Scott Shairoff, Big Al's Toy Box, NRE - Nelson's Racing Engines, Rhersion and Morisin and more.
Alin seems a little dry. Pffft, have 2 truck loads of those out back, I'd sell one to every credit limit that asks. It sells itself really. Go get a Snickers, bro
My concern would be heat as that can damage coil packs but yes removing intake and fuel lines to work on them is crazy especially if you had to do it at the track
@@Richard-wk9le then why does the box of masks say it doesn't help stop OR prevent the transmission of ANY virus or disease?! Don't be so gullible kiddo
With 800 lift I would imagine it would be a terrible street engine and very rough on valve springs. For 1/4 mile at a time though I'm sure it would be great. Small valvetrain and twin turbos out perform NA every time.
@@stageiimike2145 It would be a fine street option with higher than stock stall converter or manual, it seems to idle fairly smooth at 1050 RPM, the magic of injection and timing controlled by computer. Lift on the cam is not what determines the lumpiness, that is more controlled by duration, and valve event timing. This cam lift is .780/.782, and Duration@.050 of 270/285 Hydraulic Roller
@@dmitchellhomes The valvetrain will require a lot of maintenance with nearly .800 lift which isn't too far from Pro Stock territory. With FI getting it to idle and run can easily be done but the valves/springs/lifters are going to have a very short life span.
@@stageiimike2145 You might be a little out of date with current valve train technology, pro stock engines have used well over 1 inch valve lift for the last decade or more. They also turn 10,500 RPMs, and used to turn close to 12,000 before NHRA changed the rules. When you look at this 632, It’s a very conservative setup with a 7000 RPM redline. There’s no reason to turn it any higher, it makes peak power at 6600 RPM, when you talk about failed valve train components, it is typically caused from deflection somewhere in the valve train, and miss -matched low quality components. For an engine with a 7000 RPM redline, this 632 has a lot of insurance built-in, starting with shaft mounted rockers, but the lightweight titanium valves, and beehive springs help a lot. GM has a video online, where they ran a pull on this engine on the Dyno, it sounds to me like they started it about 2000 to 2500 RPMs, which is very low for an engine like this, and the engine just pulled hard! As for longevity, this engine will do fine as a high-performance street engine. It’s clearly not a daily driver, as it’s too tall to fit under the hood of any car. But this engine is already making over 600 foot pounds of torque at 3000 RPMs, so this thing is no dog. By 4000 RPMs it’s making 775 foot pounds of torque.
So 632 ci gets 1k hp, but a NASCAR 350ci gets 750-800 RELIABLE hp with a two barrel and extremely limited valve lift. Me thinks someone doesn't really know how to build a performance engine and/or they want to sell crap to idiots.
Apples and oranges. The ZZ632 is designed to go all out for about 8 or 9 seconds at a time from a dead start. This engine runs on pump gas and has a warranty. NASCAR engines are built for duration over a 500 mile race. Different job. They also cost considerably more than the ZZ632.
@@msh6865 Who the hell wants a trailer queen? And are you really implying that NASCAR engines don't run full out for 500 miles straight lol. They are also limited on compression ratio so what makes you claim they couldn't be made to run pump gas?
Sadly from 2030 on all combustion cars including classics will be banned from public streets in entire EU and Scandinavia :-( In Germany the Green Peoples Party and Greta FFF global inc. gave order to shorten fuel supply from 2025 on by reducing petrol stations to only one state operated central gas station per city or county. From 2027 on in the EU certain car spare parts will be banned too....as exhaust systems, turbo chargers and even some engine and gearbox oils...California and New York will do the same from 2027 on.... So no investments should be done in oil burning cars any more....:-((
All so we can save the planet by using electric cars that we charge from our homes which get their electricity from power stations that burn coal... wait what?!
@@lorddoobsworth144 Sadly Coal will be banned from 2030 on too, china and Pakistan wont deliver any coal and in the EU all Coal mines are closed and sealed from 2025 on
