To believe what you believe you have to believe that deciding to write a gay character for the sake of the character being gay inherently has to lead to bad writing. What happens if a movie studio hires cast, writers, director, etc based purely on diversity and the crew turns out to be talented and they make a good movie? Is that forced diversity? If yes, you have to concede that "forced diversity" isn't automatically a bad thing. If no, you'd have to argue that diversity is only forced if you didn't like the movie. Let's use the Ghostbusters movie for the sake of argument. If the makers of the movie told the writers and casting directors that the ghostbusters have to be women, 2 need to be black, 2 need to be gay and 1 needs to be trans. In this scenario the makers of the movie would also focus the marketing purely on the fact that the ghostbusters are now diverse women. If the writers and casting directors were to write great characters and cast amazing actors (even specifically picking a great trans actor for the trans ghostbuster) and the movie ultimately turned out to be a good movie, would that be forced diversity? I'd argue that diversity is as forced as it can be but your point is that forced diversity is bad and you've really only showed examples of forced diversity that turned out bad. So would that be forced diversity?
@@redbigun pretty much, the only other thing I remember was I ARE TECH calling him out for copying him word for word once. Honestly I’m just glad it’s ancient history at this point.
2:57 So, basically, any story written about being a women, that necessitates the main character be a woman, automatically sucks? ...at least you showed you're unworthy of consideration early.
"anti-fandom content" doesn't exist. Imagine if back in the 90s some doofus started calling "Siskel & Ebert" toxic chuds for criticising clearly bad product, that's Dane.
The fact she keeps saying "Thank you" is so fu** annoying. Trying to sound like she occupies a loftier position than the rest of us! Ha! Houts keeps talking about how important it is for us to discuss animal welfare. She was abuser! You stupid ass****! You're the perpetrator! You're not on the morally right side!!
Red Big'un- What's up with how you sound in the microphone?... It sounds like you're using an old microphone from sometime in the early-2010's, sometimes because of how muffled it is. You can really tell around 1:00:08-1:00:30.
Red Big'un- What's up with how you sound in the microphone?... It sounds like you're using an old microphone from sometime in the early-2010's, sometimes because of how muffled it is.
Red Big'un- In regards to what you said around 46:07-46:14, Duroc is either a slightly darker shade of the forest green like what you see from the Crayola crayons, or, a dark shade of olive green.
During his altercation on Twitter with his former employees Steven and Corey going back and forth arguing, he cowardly apologized to papa gut randomly. But he only did it that way cause he knew the argument with his former employees would overshadow his apology
Forgot to mention: sorry for that buzzing. It's in a few of the commentaries. I try to denoise the commentary audio to lower it, but it can be a bit annoying at times.
I agree with you until a point. From an emotional and humourous standpoint, the first one is better but from an action point of view, the second one had more high stakes.
Slow motion looks weird because it wasn't actual slow motion lol.... it's more like a flipbook comic 😆 drew some frames and trailed it with 1990 brush paint...
