Welcome to Unearthed History -- the home for all things archeological! From ancient Roman ruins to buried medieval mysteries, we'll be bringing you award-winning documentaries that explore the remnants of long lost civilizations.
Subscribe so you don't miss out.
To get in touch please email: owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
Regarding the infant bones (too young to be gendered), could it be that they might be females, as with some current cultures, a male is preferred for familial financial benefits? Or maybe that the “common soldiery” (thank you ‘Life of Brian’) required replenishing with males?
Why is this guy making Loveless look innocent? There were two children who saw their Mother's murder. Authorities knew he killed his wife. This looks like a revenge killing.
Ha ha ha history is ONE BIG LIE and deception - good to see some great people are trying to make an informed albeit much handicapped true picture of history based on artifacts and thorough research - rather than vague myths and legends with glorified agendas
Stirrups were a major advancement in military technology becoming common by the 6th and 7th century. Originally developed in eastern Persia or China. If you look back at the armies of Alexander and of Rome. A cavalryman could be unhorsed by a good attack as the reverse momentum of the response to the attack could send them off the horse. Lancers evolved later as a stirrup gave you the ability to absorb the impact upon the enemy.
Just a question but why are we digging up the dead? This would be no different if I went to a modern cemetery and just started digging up random bodies. This isn't science it's a desecration of burial sites
Why would the killer attempt to hide the husband’s body and leave the wife’s to be discovered. Is it possible by doing so he was able to throw the suspicion off himself? Good detective work.
❓ How long must a person be buried before *grave robbing* becomes *archaeology?* *Note:* I'm NOT criticising, I'm legitimately curious where that ethical boundary lies. 🧑🏼🔬🔬
I'm proven wrong, this type of story keeps occurring and there's never any smoke with out fire., and lots of different groups of people tell the same story, so it's definitely true.👍
Please… it’s NOT Due boys it’s pronounced Dew boy. No S at the end. Spelt and pronounced in the French manner. Not trying to be a snob at all, it’s just the way it’s pronounced, in the town of Dubois and everywhere else. Sorry for the rant, but I wish these presenters/narrators would take the time to get it right.
I disagree. I think the correct way to pronounce a place name is the way the locals pronounce it. Regardless of spelling, language of origin, how people in other places pronounce it, etc. Each town/city is unique and the name, as pronounced by the people that live there, reflects its individuality. It is like an oral history, but it tells of the people through their accent and/or particular phonetic idiosyncrasies. I have family in the area. They say "Du" like "do" and the "bois" portion rhymes with voice. Emphasis on the first syllable.
I know theres this quest for knowledge but it is a bit sad in a way how they go through all this process to preserve the body for the afterlife and someone comes along 2000 years later and digs her up and cuts the body open, remove her organs and then puts her on display and for what ? Just to find out how she lived and died
