Sorta wish it went into more detail regarding the appearance of animals. But then again, I think it's still hotly debated/just unknown how all that came about. Did fish come from worms possibly, creatures like lancelets? Or did fish come from other protochordates, from creatures akin to pomatrum?
کص شعر همش کص شعر تکامل حرف های چارلز داروین همش ارزش گوه هم نداره فقط دروغ اگه انسان تکامل یافته بود چطوری سیاه و سفید پوست درست شد هزاران تناقضات ديگر 😂
@@SoyElLoboGris13 خب اهمیت نده . لعنت الله به تو . تو در اشتباهی و مزه اشتباهات خودت را در روز قیامت خواهی چشید . من حرف حق و درست رو گفتم که تو جوابی نداری 🖕🏿
All I hear you saying is: _"I do my very best to avoid understanding science, so I can continue to believe in primitive backward magic fairy tales, that only somebody with the mental age of child would hold onto"._
Watch again, and pay closer attention. Our ancestors were not dinosaurs. At 4:20 you see an organism bottom centre with a sail down its back, this is a *_synapsid_* (not a dinosaur) which led to the mammals. The creature to it's right is a *_diapsid_* which gave rise to the dinosaurs and reptiles.
WOW this is an awesome video!! Great job with the detailed animations and diagrams! I know it’s been two years, but I do have a question: what is the protein chemical reaction notation you use (for example at the bottom of the screen at 1:03 ?) I’ve never seen it but it seems very interesting. Anyways thank you so much for creating the video!
I think you are projecting your own fallibility onto scientific investigation. Haven't you been sucked in by some _"fictional propaganda"_ called the Quran?
Funny how people are getting so sensitive about this. Evolution, yeah, it is likely to exist, though is still a theory, but so is the existence of a god. Is it confirmed either exist? Nope. Does it mean others should believe one or the other? Also, no.
Of course not. This is a "time-lapse" (not actually, but an illustration) that's based on the proofs that you're unwilling to access, since you got indoctrinated into believing that education is indoctrination... Curious how ironies work, huh?
@@Jason_Hubred isn't it interesting how paranoid, tinfoil-hat wearing, conspiracy theorist, nut cases, always refer to a mysterious _"they"_ who are never identified?
@@Jason_Hubred *This isn't education* This is education, and you're just one more case of a person talking about an experience you didn't have yourself. First things first, kiddo: get education, and then you see if you're able to debunk one of the most well substantiated theories humans have ever come up with. *You're right! It doesn't* No argument there. That's just an illustration. The proofs are the ones you can't explain any other way. For example, we can observe with our own eyes, in geological strata, a change in the biological diversity over time here on Earth (stratigraphy). We can see, with our very own eyes, that in older layers of rock all around the globe (you do believe the Earth is a globe, don't you?) we find a specific fauna and flora, and that on newer layers of rock the fauna and flora change. You can't find fossils of apes in the Devonian stratas, for example. The theory of evolution is the one that explains that change of life forms over time, buddy. And you would have got that if you hadn't dropped out of kindergarten. *They insert "time in the gaps"* Nobody inserts time in whatever "gaps" you're referring to. Time is a dimension of the universe, son. Everything that happens in the universe, happens in that dimension (time). If something happened, it has a "time coordinate". When a crime is committed, it happens at some point in time. And you don't have to be present seeing the crime as it's committed in order to follow the clues and get to the criminal who did it. That's what grown ups do, kiddo! We investigate the evidence that allows us to reach rational conclusions that are shown to be consistent beyond reasonable doubt, whereas your argument is _"if something is said to take longer than my ephemerous lifespan to happen, then it can't happen"._ Amusing, but some would say that that's a _non sequitur_ fallacy, kid. Grow up! *as if that makes all the problems with their conjecture disappear* There are no problems, son. We have experienced that in shorter time frames. You're just too ignorant and are too butthurt because of the fact that you don't like an academic consensus that you THINK to be opposing your poor interpretations of a religious doctrine.
*This is not true btw* Your unwillingness to accept an academic consensus has more to do with your lack of education than with the lack of consistency of evolution. *turn away from the world embrace christ* Educated christians do that while still believing in evolution. In fact, the greatest christian institution on the planet agrees that evolution is consistent beyond reasonable doubt. That's why they interpret their religious doctrine accordingly. You can't beat reality, son. There's no point in fighting reality. Reality is real, you know?
@@Jason_Hubred All science is are consensuses. Science is made of consensuses, kiddo. If there are no consensuses, there's no science. If you had ever had any academic background, you would have known that.
@@Jason_Hubred *Yeah, no, it's not* Being a stubborn child won't help you, kiddo. Science is a COLLECTIVE EFFORT. There's no such thing as a "one man science". Academic scrutiniy is an essential part of scientific knowledge productivity, since that's how we eliminate subjectivities of individuals and make our knowledge objective. We produce scientific knowledge not by trying to prove our hypothesis right, but when academia fails to prove them wrong. That's how we know we're onto something. But you're a kindergarten dropout. How could you possibly know that? *Discovering bacteria and viruses isn't a consensus* Yes, it is. That's called the germ theory, and it's only a theory because it has passed through peer reviewing. *Performing a scientific experiment isn't a mofo consensus* Performing an experiment is PART of that process, kiddo. The experiment still needs to be falsified and peer reviewed. You can't go to the playground and play with a bucket full of sand and tell people that you have performed an experiment, and that people should just trust you on your conclusions. That's not how it works, you poor dumb baby! *Science existed looooong before this stupid concept of consensus came around* Of course NOT. Science didn't exist in ancient times, kiddo! Science as we know it only emerged in history after the work of Francis Bacon, one of the founders of the scientific method. But of course you wouldn't know that, since you're a kindergarten dropout. *I'm probably way more than 10 years your senior, "kiddo." Don't call me "kiddo," "kiddo* Then stop behaving like a toddler throwing a tantrum over a subject you don't understand.
