Awesome Human Evolution Timelapse 

Thank you!

Woow thanks 🤩

So, plesiadapitz is austrian or german

@smallnad1 what? I cant say that. im frozen. Beacause you are very dumb poo. Ok thats joke. 💯% no

Living beings started as a combo and cocktail of elements chemically fused together like Carbon, Hydrogen, Oxygen and Nitrogen.

Well, it is not about believing or not, because unlike religions, science has already demonstrated that evolution is something real.

Nop you realy wanna me to believe that we was a fish then a creature that can live without water? And then monkeys and then humans? Is ther any logic in being a fish then a monkey?

​@@bluesorcerer83hmm nop were they describe or showing some evidence that we wer fishes

@@kinggames8075do you actually think a fish just turned into a monkey just like that

​@@kinggames8075bro evolution is not a single day process, if you are into biology then explain is we were born as human from day 1😂

Not only is the best but the only explanation and not only to human origins but the diversification of life.

no

And before that? Science always gives 100 new questions for every question answered. Science makes people dissatisfied with no sense of purpose.

@@biggibbs4678 because religion has all the answers to life’s most pressing questions

How do YOU know lol

It is not that insane, that is just biology and evolution at play....always happening.

How are they created

@@ellidominusser1138 formed into existence idk

And plausible

bro

Thats a good slidewshow animated video regarding the theme of the Evolution of life in the Solar system. Yet with a lot of misplacing of the describing new living species, regarding the main chronological specter and the place of their surgence as well. So here goes some real History of life in the Solar System with proper placing and chronology: About 450M years ago, the Solar system surged within the not so far outskirts of the Via Lactea galaxy from the wider central region of the Universe. When then a new G2V class of main Star, started its new live. Being that the Sol has a Star fusion breathing cycle of around 120M Years. Then regarding life beings themselfs: everything started with Venus that that initially collided with Mercury about 325M years ago, when Mercury was still a gas giant similar to nowadays Saturn. And that 1st inner solar system collision gave Venus a good "soup" of rare gases; that were rapidly further converted into organic molecules gases; even thought the Sol imploded for the 1st time around the same time of that refereed before collision. Afterward around 250M years ago, Venus collided with Marte, whitch sent both Marte and Venus into a rapid counter-orbital-path axial spin. Being that Marte got a cocktail of organic gases from Venus. And because this second planetary collision coincided with yet another solar implosion that this time helped clearing Mars orbital path from a lot of meteorites. Then Marte gave birth to the "first life being" of the Solar system about 245M years ago. With life beings in Mars managing to evolve their way until robust Sea Sponges and land Thicks as well. Later in time, Marte went to collide with Terra about 150M years ago; whitch sent both Marte and Terra into a similar rapid spin, this time with their same orbital path direction. And that third similar area planetary collision gave the Terra and the Moon: a big enough bowl of still alive and surviving Martians. From that point on, the Terra planet woulda nourish those former Martians, meanwhile enduring two solar implosions: one about 145M Years ago, during the Terra "red iron" oceans phase and another about 40M years ago, during the Terra's "late Carboniferous" Era. So regarding the Hominids of the Terra, it started more specifically with the surgence of the Gorgonapsis about 30M years ago, that evolved into primates 25M years ago, that then evolved into bipedal small Hominids about 20M years ago. The Hominids then managed to endure across the Age of the Dinossaurs that had started about 25M years ago and also to the crash-land onto Terra, of its inner orbit smaller Moon, about 7M years ago, at the nowadays Gulf of Mexico, leaving a very obvious continental scar just afterwards. Later and about 1M years ago, the first complex language (similar to nowadays Umbundo language) and the 1st Hominid civilization; started at the lower planes of the nowadays Tshitundulu region, Angola, Africa; with the help of a small group of Madagascan Dinonichous that had survived to the previous stellar making of the Gulf of Mexico, serious extinction event; as well. To conclude, the last Moon of Terra will naturally crash land onto Terra as well in about 5.5M years, ( if the Terrans cant manage to keep it going up there, there is.); and the Sol will implode again in about 61M years, ( about whitch "Suntan lotion" manufacturers will get rich, just before dying). Further than that.: the show down here at the Planet Terra; cannot be runned by retardeds anymore!; like unfortunately its still the case nowadays. Or the Hominids and the illustrious former Martians; will be gone, way before any of 2 already on their way, serious life extinction events at and for planet Terra, arrive.

@@aberdeenkiko huh?

You actually was initially like worm in your mom's stomach ask any doctor stages of human birth, women can't produce human in one day it take more than 09 months

for some reason youtube recomends this video to cristians jajaja 😅

Like how those cells came from nothingness.

I am a religious person myself and I believe in evolution.

Internet brainwashing became possible.

@@grisheexi7219Yea, I too am spiritual, but accept evolution as a fact. God did create us, but he also didn’t put us at the center of the solar system, nor did he put nature to revolve around man. God spent 3.7 billion years to make us, and the rest of life we know now and millions of years before our times; and I wholeheartedly appreciate him for his dedication and work.

bro stop trying to sound cool, its called "evolution" and "may the best win"

Think of the rich inner life I've lived, and how it's not at all relevant to what we're talking about. According to evolution, all that was also true, but without the safety net of God. Plus it now goes back a billion years and many, MANY more generations.

Brother, you are really chad, you gave the necessary answers to theists in the comments.

Genentic engineering is what comes next. It is scary, now cells, with the power of science are gonna edit their own genes to evolve faster.

Artificial Intelligence will be the dominant force soon. In a million years? Some evolved life form will come...much more intelligent and capable than humans.

Thank you! Will do!

Evolution is a fact, but I think evolution is disgusting and that there is nothing beautiful about it.

​@@aspiknffax

@@aspiknf But we don't have a time machine, and this animation doesn't make it look too ugly.

@@flixtocicgaming3576 Thank you ☺.

Let them see it! jajajajaja 😆 Every view counts!

Not easy for some certain others...

Bunların hepsi yalandır

я тебя поздравляю

I originally intended to do it like that. But it looked so messy and overcrowded. But yea, i can do it.

​​@@MolecularAnimationsoftheCell Oh wow thankyou, if you did that it would be the best evolution video I've seen.

​​​@@MolecularAnimationsoftheCell But it's up to you, this video is still one of the best I've seen!

1:32

As you may learn, our genome, along with those of other multicellular and single-cell organisms, contains pieces of viral genes. Some of which later became functional genes that we now use. One example is a protein that aids in the development of the placenta. I think the proteins responsible for detecting light also originated from viruses. But yes, we ourselves and many other organisms are, in fact, a fusion of several organism genomes, such as mitochondria or chloroplasts.

@@MolecularAnimationsoftheCell I didn't know that, thanks for the info!

So the main hypothesis is that self replicating proteins predate cells and eventually enough of these end up in a lipid bubble and boom! First cell

@@kevinpeters6709 thanks!

Sure. 🙂

My ex is from there

I used to think similarly, believing in a Christian-science hybrid where God created simple rules guiding the evolution of life. However, I eventually realized that I was essentially crafting my own version of Christianity-one that wasn't explicitly supported by the Bible. It led me to question whether the Bible is truly the word of the creator. Perhaps it was written by mortals, and there's no definitive way to prove it wrong. Considering the multitude of religions, each with its own set of scriptures, it's challenging to assert the correctness of one over another. While non-Christian religions may differ from the Bible, labeling them as 'wrong' seems odd. It's a complex and subjective matter that often goes beyond simple alignment with a particular scripture.

You can believe that if you want to, but evolution works just as well without the need for a god to be present.

Love this comment ❤

Lore😂

evolution theory doesn't describe the beginning of life .At the animation, we see just molecules coming together but it is more complicated. Even the most basic cells are made of proteins and they are made of amino acids. Amino acids are coplex molecules. No amino acid could have formed in the liquid called chemical soup 3.5 billion years ago. This has nothing to do with luck, it is just impossible. Even now, synthesizing amino acids, which are necessary for life, is an extremely challenging process. At the same time, amino acids cannot combine on their own "by chance" and form a protein. If you took a biology course in high school, you know this. In order to produce a protein, a fully developed cell requires mRNA, a process that involves many steps. It is necessary to produce a protein with aminoists using amino acids. It is too difficult to happen by chance. In short, it's like the first chicken or egg question. There can't be an egg without a chicken, there can't be a chicken without an egg. And likewise, there can't be a cell without a protein, there can't be a protein without a cell. so siple it is

ДНК не может возникнуть само. Оно даже существовать может только уже в клетке. Даже вирусы не могут существовать вне живых организмов. Любое ДНК само по себе разрушится в бесконечное количество раз быстрее, чем разовьется во что-либо. Здесь просто показывают (не)научную фантастику.

красивая сказка для тех, кто ничего не понимает в химии и биологии. самозарождение жизни невозможно, как и эволюция. наука это доказала.

​@@user-ri8hi3bx2iLike I already said in your own comment, you are completely wrong

I thought that too 🙌🏻

polymerase enzyme making the first self replicating rna strand

@safin But why!?!? Everything up until that point kinda makes sense, it looks like small parts bouncing around together till they sloowly build something more complex, like a million magnets or pieces of velcro. But then out of nowhere it stops just bouncing and decides to show BEHAVIOUR. Like, the kind of actions you can only learn. Where did that come from? Is that moment the first spark of life?

​@@mayathepsychiicwell in truth its actually- well yes it the spark but what i was saying was that its actually just floating there and its just animated that way so you neednt watch it jiggle for an hour.

@@flixtocicgaming3576 Okay, so this is just a somewhat simplified version of scientific theory.

It is the option that seems most plausible to me: cells that intracellularly parasitize other cells, gradually becoming more specialized to create the greatest number of copies in each infection.

"Humans and monkeys are both primates. But humans are not descended from monkeys or any other primate living today. We do share a common ape ancestor with chimpanzees. It lived between 8 and 6 million years ago."

That is not a chimpanzee; it is the common ancestor of chimpanzees and humans. I imagine they didn't look so different. @@sparrow_solas

@@MolecularAnimationsoftheCell Oh, so that's not a drawing of a chimpanzee you traced from google images? Alright then, perhaps you can answer something that's on my mind, does this "common ancestor" actually have a name or officially accepted drawing?

@@sparrow_solas This video isn't going to show you the billions of different changes. Same way as you and I look different from each other, this is showing an average of changes over time. Can you give a name for every color of the rainbow? Can you tell me exactly where orange ends and yellow starts? There are billions of colors in the rainbow, not just 3, or even 7 or 100.

@@rockmusicvideoreviewer896Your response was a little too pretentious for my liking. I'm simply curious if the common ancestor between humans and chimpanzees has ever been actually identified.

a phosphate molecule, the key molecule for life to start.

Those weird shapes are electron orbitals

If you are refering to the spotted, tadpole-like creature, I'd say it's an icthyostega or some other early tetrapod. If you are refering to the thing beneath the jellyfish, I think it's either a tunicate or a comb jelly.

Your parents are just larger clusters of atoms.

You are just a large cluster of atoms

@@Davi-rg7fd Oh, not me, I obviously hold myself to much higher regard, godlike one could say.

Now, entertain me, clump of matter..

👍👍👍👍🧬🧬🧬🧬

This is bullshit, the creationism is the real and the only explanation to all creatures , I have a question, why just the monkeys developed to be a humans, why the planets is not why the fishes is not, another question, why evolution stops in some speices like fish and dog etc, why we don't see new creatures???

@@othmanalzahrani911 Good question. But that doesn't have much to do with the person's question.

​@@othmanalzahrani911because that shit takes time and we havent been around long enough to witness that and we only would look for that iin yhe last 200 years which its really not long

@@surfacepro3328 this is not answer , it is impossible to believe that some amino acids become a strong RNA and some of them know the wrongs and became RNa polymerase , and rRna and mRna etc... it is impossible to be , even if some one who create these and teach them don't sell your mind to those who trade by the name of science.

@@othmanalzahrani911monkeys!? we didn’t split from monkeys

I originally intended to do it like that. But there is a lot going on at the same time and so fast that it looked messy. But I may do another one with description.

@@MolecularAnimationsoftheCell that would be great very nice video though that has a lot of animations pretty sure it took a lot of time and effort to do so

No

​@@survivaldude29your Just a kid

@@marcosjuniopereiracarvalho8609 you’re*

@@marcosjuniopereiracarvalho8609 you’re bad at grammar

@@survivaldude29 so?

Yeah, and it is so cool how we can study it just like all other natural phenomenon

Bruh 💀

No, your god didn't do it, it was MY make believe, imaginary, pretend friend who did it all with magic! LOL

​​@@TheHairyHeathenwelp of you believe that all this is real but also believe that nah its just suddenly just nature ther is no creator that the real problem I'm not telling you a religion just a creator cause its imposible to all this don't have a creator

@@kinggames8075 I think perhaps you missed the point of my comment, or you didn't want to understand it. _"All this",_ as you described what is portrayed in this video, is based on knowledge gained from actual physical evidence, it isn't a matter of belief. _"Belief"_ is what you have when you don't have knowledge (ignorance), and that's where stories about magical creators begin to emerge. Your baseless assertion _"its imposible to all this don't have a creator"_ is simply a declaration of ignorance, and a willingness to insert an unevidenced magical answer instead of looking for actual knowledge. If you don't have the answer to something, then the only honest answer you can give is "I don't know", because declaring that you *know* it was because of magical intervention by any agency is not honest, is it? Are you simply ASSUMING that reality is a created thing because you can't think of a better answer? If so then consider this: can you point out what objectively verifiable, detectable and measurable, properties , qualities and/or attributes something must have (or lack) in order to unambiguously be determined to have been created? If you cannot answer this, then you cannot honestly claim it was created, can you? If you cannot show something is created, then you certainly cannot honestly claim it had a creator, can you? When you start using this sort of magical thinking, you are only fooling yourself, and conditioning yourself to be gullibly susceptible to other made up answers fed to you instead of verifiable truth. Stay skeptical.

@@TheHairyHeathen In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. Want proof? Look around. It all calls for a creator, designer, a being not confined to space and time. This all didn't just happen, it was designed.

@@TheHairyHeathen I pray that God encounters you in a way that cannot be denied by any skepticism. You are his child, he loves you, he longs for a relationship with you.

Can't wait to see it ten years from now after getting captured by the algorithm