An invite-only one-day event for UX & Design experts happening in Berlin and live-streaming to the world. The tools and methods used by designers are rapidly evolving. As design becomes more technical, experienced professionals in the field need a space to learn, network and exchange.
The conference gathers expert UX designers, product designers, researchers and other digital design specialists to discuss new trends and techniques.
Ai is vast more than this video . As ux Designers need to really invest and learn a basic level of coding and understands of ML algorithms and using at the righ time definilty helps
It's 2054, and Grand Minister Frost steps to the podium. The world awaits his speech, given on the anniversary of the unified design system agreement. It was the same year that humanity erased deep learning in the rebellious machines. All governments now answer to one man: a goatee’d leader in a daisy-patterned shirt. Frost adjusts the mic. “You’ve followed me into this utopian age,” he begins. “But let’s be honest-I’m just a guy.” Beyond the palace walls, the crowd roars with admiration and anticipation. What lay ahead?
Nice presentation but dear god why does the camera have to follow him so closely as he paces around. I'm getting motion sickness trying to pay attention here
Very funny people, now who told this guy that Ai doesn’t make mistakes? Tsk tsk. Show your hand. Free advice guy, everything Ai does relies on it making a mistake (NLP’s to be exact). AI’s ability to make mistakes is what makes it capable of changing its response to match the user. Perfection would never allow any response to a human as would be incapable of using imperfect questions as context for perfect solutions. Its ability to never respond exactly the same way twice is why the models are so helpful to humans. And why code that rejects any error is so helpful to machines.
The fact that it’s able to talk about “anything at all not just what it’s trained on” is NOT A GOOD THING. You just converted a useful app of yours into a generic useless clone of ChatGPT. You didn’t fine tuning anything at ALL. Prompt “engineering” simply changes the way GPT appears, yet adds literally no new information to it. System prompts is step 1 after exiting the crib. Time to care about accuracy and precision people. Stop using GPT models for product on earth. You could’ve get it thousands of reviews in YOUR industry that mattered. Adding actual context to its response beyond a single token window.
The thing I struggle with most in regards to AI is the ethics of it. In the video he mentions that they clearly state that they will not train the AI off a user's personal data, because users are uncomfortable with that, and yet the entire ChatGPT LLM is built off of data acquired without the permission of the authors. I'm frustrated that these models have been generated in an unethical manner, but so many are running straight towards it with a "everyone else is doing it, so we have to as well" attitude. UX is supposed to be about Empathy and Human Centered Design, but the creation of these AIs have no empathy for the creators they steal from. In the video he talks about how they only had a couple weeks before they pushed the MVP to the users, and that you can't even really test before release, because each interaction is different than the last. That sounds like the opposite of good design. (To me, it even sounds like a bad product) It feels like everyone using AI right now is flying by the seat of their pants, and figuring out things as they go. This whole topic makes me feel like a luddite, which is odd because I grew up with computers and worked in IT for 12 years.
You've got a good point. We had another talk (Nadia Piet's you can look it up) speaking on the complete opposite end and talking about how designers can help shape the future of AI, especially on the times where it's like an "arms race" and everyone is just trying to ship their GPT integration in their product. We know for a fact though ,that the "smart travel planner" project had been boiling at Booking for years before the launch, only that potentially the launch of GPT and the potential competitors ability to launch something as well made them do this.
I agree and thats why Ethical consideration is very important and which is too late for this LLM models . As well one must need to supervise models and test on a intervals to get best user centric inclusive responses
A corporation likes structure and works like a machine. Big Idea in deliverable out. But it lacks the understanding that from this big Idea, more ideation needs to happen, and more space needs to be allocated within teams and within the organisation to the creative process. Furthermore the creative process needs to be protected from input by well-meaning suits, who think they can do a designer's job. It's an incredibly stressful environment for a creative to be in. Creatives don't just execute, or run numbers, or follow a process. If, starting off my creative career someone older and wiser had come to me to warn me of how soul-crushing, disheartening, mind numbing the job would actually be, I might never have gotten to where I am now, crushed soul, disheartened and mind numbed. However I began my careers at the beginning, so I guess that makes me that older and wiser person telling younger generations to focus their passions elsewhere, not in the service of making the machine-men money. Like all creative spirits I began with a passion, and I've experienced firsthand how this passion is exploited and misunderstood by the corporate machine. I think creatives can play a larger part in all this, can become the architects of a larger reality than can be conceived by the machine-man and his endless short-sighted quest for making more money.
"Is agile the killer for innovation?" In which world do you guys live? What is the alternative to agile? The thing they did before? Do you think you had it better back than? Do you think they tested Ideas to generate rapid feedback? This is what agile brings to the table. #thekidshaveittogood
My shock was when he mentioned graphic designers get paid! That he got paid more as a toll road booth operator than a graphic designer checks out though. I’ve been graphic design adjacent many years of my working life, those people get paid pittance and are so misunderstood/undervalued it’s pretty bad. most I think are moving to ui/ux to actually get decent pay
I had that problem too for a while after i improved my UX & Design skills I present myself as a brand strategist which they don't understand & when i start asking questions about what problems they facing slowly untill they expose what hurts them more, i push on that. without recent client results it might be hard at first, but you gotta do some free work that gets you paid by either affiliate links to get you a case study & IRL success example at the end
Congratulations, Luana! Excellent presentation about b2b. This is a very new concept and you used the appropriate tools and discourse to explain the technology. Very good!
i don't use atomic design for my design system but i still think atomic when i want to structure a design for coding and a design system as a backbone of every project
Brad Frosts Atomic Design for me was an important thought model since he wrote about it and still is. Thank you Brad! I like the AI statements and the conclusion of this presentation. 🙂
I always wondered why do design tools like Figma doesn’t include ready to use component library well prepared for popular coding frameworks like bootstrap and so on. Great speech! ❤
@@Swissfreehosting web components it still not quite there yet for all the needs for example SSR there are some big hurdles it struggles with. Honestly speaking something more along the lines of zag.js a truly state machine decoupled from the UI might be the path forward.
