It would probably not be too difficult to correct the title of your dissertation. You can (gently) use a razor knife to scrape/peel just the gold of the "E" in "MODEL," revealing the word "MOD L." Then use a 3D printer to print a correctly scaled printing-press-style block with an embossed letter "A" on it, and use this press block with some gold leaf to print a gold "A" where you removed the letter "E" earlier. If you are gentle enough with the removal process, the re-work would probably not even be detectable under close visual scrutiny. Xacto brand knives and blades are inexpensive. The printing block is literally a cube with a letter "A" protruding from one face. Gold leaf is also inexpensively available at arts and crafts shops. I believe in you.
you have more self control than i do, if i noticed something that nice that i made had a misprinted title that wasnt my fault i would have died instantly
wow, you've done it again. just a fun ride throughout. LLMs are cool stuff. loved the Loren epsum comparison, and I love how no matter how ridiculous a tangent might be, it has incredible relevance. absolutely loved the commitment, even to rewriting the GNU public license just to align nicely LOL and the ending montage was awesome. The coffee joke was the golden cherry on top. tom, you are a great inspiration of mine. combining the insanity of committing to the bit, and the incredible application of knowledge is something I hope one day I can achieve. until next time!!!
Boy, those cuffs don't look cosey! Anyway thanks for accepting the visit; I'm gonna need a date to give the publisher, they're worried people are beginning to forget the dissertation murders.
But clearly, the AI adjusted version “Epsom” - while visually superior - lacks the: “Je ne sais quoi,” of a superior human intellect - aka the “Kunth” version.
Maybe you could try to get it to maintain the meaning of the message by training it on information density and encoding certain values with a weight indicating it should not be changed, like a specific number. I really expected him to be holding the gun by the slide at the end instead of the grip, pretty funny regardless.
so if i’m understanding this right… generalized kerning is undecidable because any instance of the procedure creates a new initial condition to be tested, whereas anagraphs have a fixed and calculable possibility space from the start?
It's not actually a distinction between finite and infinite, although only (potentially) infinite things can be undecidable. (For finite stuff, you just patiently list them all out and check them. As long as you eventually finish enumerating them and checking each one, the procedure will terminate with a definite answer.) Some infinite things just have enough patterns to be tractable. Many others (most?) do not.
Oooh. I did a similar thing for generating paragraphs from text without paragraphs. I basically forced the generation to either use the original text or insert a line break. (badly-drawn-wizards/Paragrai on GitHub).
@@tom7 "You don't understand! Yellow clues just force you to reuse the letter" "No, they force you to reuse the letter BUT not in the same place. Otherwise there wouldn't be any difference between yellow and green" "You're so pedantic it's just a game"
2:17 Tom is basically the Knuth of RU-vid. If I get a video a year, I feel lucky, and I know it's gonna be the most exquisite video uploaded that year. Truly the epitome of the value of only releasing something "when it's done"
