SK_Itachi. Nossa, como que eu vim parar aqui? Entrei no SK quando o Hamasaki já não estava tanto na ativa. Já o Kyuu e o Portuga, nossa, eram os professores da galera que estavam iniciando. Lembro do campeonato que participamos que, se não me engano, terminamos em segundo. Galera incrível aquela. Bons tempos que passamos juntos
the f/a 18 superhornet was not meant to replace the f-14 tomcat. the hornet was made to replace the phantom COMPLIMENT(or work with) the tomcat. tomcats have been phased out because they are bi-planes(two seats). as technology grows there is a lesser need for the copilot so the tomcat was slowly phased out for the more modern single-seat planes like the f-18. the hornet is also more maneuverable than the tomcat.
During an exercise with the Eurofighter vs raptor, the Eurofighter just play'ed with the raptor and after 5 attemp's the raptors cancelled the exercise. Just so you know:P
I think you are over looking the fact American aircraft use data links from E3s in the theater of operation....It does not even need to turn their radar on....
The first part of the comment was: The F-22 has taken 20+ years to develop and much much more money than the Typhoon,but with that the Raptor is not that MUCH better than the Eurofighter! You know a lot of airplanes and you know that in the air the lighter you are the better,and we all know which of the 2 planes is ligther! Also the Eurof.has been developed by the best scientists from Europe and don't tell me that USA has them all!
I think that the lighter Typhoon can beat the Raptor,but that's my opinion! Discovery Channel don't say always all of the story,don't understand me wrong I am a fan of Disc.Channel, but i don't think that they will say that the newest fighter in the USAF is NOT the best in the world! Isn't that so?
The F-22 is not invisible,it shows on the radar,but it is really small,but i am sure that the Typhoon radar can see the Raptor! And in a dogfight the Eurofighter will beat the F-22,because it more maneuverabel!
Don't misunderstand me the F-22 is a hell of a plane and may kick ass, but so does the Typhoon. Btw. anyone knows sth bout the newest russian radar technologies? I heard some of em may even take on B-2 or F-22s
The F-22 weapons capacity is more than limited...any F-16 is more multirole than the F-22. I dont know the F-22 attacking capacities, but if you want to shoot down a plane with air-to-air on long distance you need a radar. Means you lock on and then you shine like a christmas tree. the lower the distance is the higher the risk to be seen. Stealth is an advantage but it is not the godmode. as you could see when a Nighthawk was shot down
but many countries are getting stealth planes like the f-35, and there is no way in hell the typhoon can go up against a stealth plane. we are comparing air superiority and multirole to simply see who would shoot the other down, with the answer being the f-22 shooting down the typhoon. and the f-22 has plenty of multirole capability.
Comparing an Miltirole airplane and an air superiority fighter? first mistake...2nd mistake...no one really knows how effective the radars of any plane is. Both are prolly the best ones available also the defense systems...the F-22's big disadvantage is the price. The typhoon can keep up easily with modern air planes and fulfill it's role. Kicking 2 F-15's ass in a real dogfight speaks for itself. I'd prefer the E/F because it is cheaper and more flexible
i don't care if the translation is wrong, go blame google translate, not me.the f-22 can shoot down the typhoon from 130 miles away and the typhoon has no clue were the f-22 is. even if it goes wvr, the f-22 has an all-around multi-spectral missile warning system that doubles as an irst system. the f-22 also has thrust vectoring. the typhoon irst system only looks forwards. f-22 infrared/ultraviolet search and track system looks everywhere, not just in front of them.
please don't make things up. 1 f-22 can easily kill many typhoons, here is a translation in german: Hier ist eine Übersetzung in Deutsch von Google Translate: Bitte nicht die Dinge auf. 1 f-22 kann leicht töten viele eurofighter Taifune
and we have completely stealth cruise missiles. and we don't mess around with choosing a warhead. the storm shadow warhead is a puny 990 pounds, and the AGM-129 ACM uses a W-80-1 Thermonuclear warhead with a yield of 150 Kilotons.
there is no way in hell that it could have a smaller rcs than the f-22. storm shadow is simply reduced rcs. the storm shadow, like the typhoon, is designed to reduce the head-on radar signature. and if u want to get near us, u have to go through the SBX radar, which can track objects smaller than a baseball more than 3000 miles away.
Actually there is absolutely no evidence that F-22 won...the ONLY publicly released reports said that Typhoon won decisively at all ranges...and they DID say that the USAF refused to play the next day. RAF personnel were actually told to stop talking about it by their superiors because the USAF was embarassed and getting annoyed...
it doesn't even matter what the typhoon's multirole capabilities are. it will be knocked out of the sky before it can get anywhere near us. if it used a bomb it would have to be extremely close to us, and would definitely be shot down by raptors. if it launched a cruise missile the missile would be shot down even more easily than the typhoon.
the evidence actually suggests that the f-22 killed the typhoons with no problem. there is little evidence of this in the first place. the raptors would have been happy to kill the typhoons again the next day, but they probably either returned langely afb of elmendorf afb, or since china lake is used for testing, they might have been testing missiles such as the aim-120d.
F-35 is for a different purpose...we've always had several different strike planes at one time (Harrier/Jaguar/Tornado GR.1/4/4A) Typhoon can carry a bigger payload than F-35 for a start...oh, and the US is getting it too...so I could say the same about F-22...however, I can assure you that Typhoon is a better strike plan than F-22 is. BTW heavy bombers are so outdated now...
The only evidence about a mock engagement between Typhoon and Raptor actually said that F-22 pilots were surprised that they were getting waxed at BVR by the Typhoons, and that the Typhoons, I quote, "dominated the WVR fight"...why do you think the Raptor pilots refused to play the next day?
Actually the 241-0 kill ratio was for one exercise...against US planes....with US pilots....you think they're going to let their new pride and joy look like a turkey?
the f-22 has plenty of multirole capability. if the typhoon is so damn good, then why the fuck are you buying the f-35? and you don't even have an actual bomber, just smaller strike aircraft.
there is little evidence that the f-22 has ever faced typhoon, and the little evidence suggests that the f-22 dominated at bvr, and both were about even at wvr. if this did actually happen, the f-22 also shot down the typhoon many times. with stealth, there will be very few wvr battles. in red flag in alaska, there were about 3 engagements wvr.
