The law-legal system is run on the basis of COERCION/EXTORTION/VIOLENCE PERIOD! Countries are corporations as are the police and both listed as LLC'S/corporations. If and when they choose to abuse/violate you THEY WILL and they will get away it because they act with legal immunity/impunity!!!
This is hilarious what does this cop think is appropriate and legal. We had a call so that is enough for his total lack of respect. We don't have a crime but if you give us your ID that will give us all the evidence we need. I would be embarrassed to even try this on. What a Muppet particularly when he starts walking around looking at the ground..
He is so used to people just doing what he says without arguing. But his ego won’t let him accept that he’s up against someone smarter than him. Amazing
Mr. LEROY: his hand was on his hips and it is very visible. So do you agree you mad two false statements? Or can you show the viewers that the Preston officer did indeed have his hand on his gun, that you stated "twice " and yes it was in his holster but his hands were on his hips and no their was no Intimidation towards you.
So again @ 9 minutes and 30 seconds of the video you stated again that the officer placed his hand on his gun. Again I did not see it in your Preston gym video.
@leroirobinson-grant5885 dude I watch it twice and gave you the times you said it. Now I am calling you out to prove it. You preach like you have all the answers, now step up and prove it.
@leroirobinson-grant5885 let's face it your a liar and a problem to Society. You act as if you know it all. But your the problem is you know nothing. Good luck I hope you vote on the left. Not need to reply and if you do your not satisfied unless you get the last word. So I called you out and so showed us you Perjured your self.
Dude you still haven't answered the question. You stated twice in this video that the Officer had is hand on his gun and it's not in the video. So show it and prove it since you know so much about the law.
Cops need your help. Please advocate to help them. You stated twice " he had is hand on his gun, please rewatch the video I did not see it in the video? Was it off camera? They need your help. Be blessed.
@leroirobinson-grant5885 you stated in this video that the caroline county officer had his hand on his gun while he was taking to you, you said it twice . Well after watching the video of you in the Preston gym he never had or even close to having his hand on his gun. You need to watch it again or did he do it off camera. You made a false statement twice.
I think we need to realize what is probably happening. Racist doesn't want the black face seen, they call the police to have black removed, mention black skin, and make up a crime or "suspicion" - which is all some racist cops need to hear to come running.
I appreciate the comment, but it is illegal and misuse of government documents to use government property to stalk an individual for personal reasons. Who told you they can do that?
I appreciate the comment. I am not a, "her." My voice may not be extremely deep, but I would have to question whether or not a individual is a woman with a voice tone so low. I have yet to meet a woman with a voice as deep as mine. To answer your question, it is part of their duty to lie. It is a method to gain information as the teaching is lying might get someone to admit/confess to a crime they wouldn't otherwise. The issue is some tend to do it no matter the situation.
I appreciate the input. I decided against it as the same gym is one frequented by public service individuals. We had a good laugh at their expense and I was advised of the situation with them. This interaction along with others and the reckless adherence to the law by law enforcement agents sparked me to run for Sheriff as it is blatantly obvious guidance, not Authoritarianism is necessary. It will not be for that department, but it will make sure the departments in the surrounding area provide the community the support they need.
Shut up. Whiny cry baby. Should have just ignored them or walked away as soon as they said no crime. Instead he stood there and went over and over on the same details.
Thanks for the comment. "stop and ID" is unconditional and therefore unlawful. It is legal in some states, but highly against human law. The only way it is legal is a commercial/business interaction. Most individuals don't understand or know the difference and that is what they're hoping is true every stop.
It's a crime if you do cuz they don't want you being crooked like them ...they lie constantly and without fail to get what they want and are down right sneaky AF,and if you have proof or you raise your hand and say ..hey this isn't fair or right ..they lie some more to say they didn't lie ...see it's a virus cycle of lies they weave
This incompetence needs to stop. I was taught to be the best and know my stuff. I graduated from university. I have worked for the best companies. These people pollute and hinder progress in our society. Mayors, Representatives, all other so called leaders need to get this incompetence and tyranny, freedom papers, situation taken care of. What is going on here.?
You are 100% correct. They have to have probable cause that a crime has been committed, is being committed or will be committed, and they have to, "reasonably articulate," or speak out loud, what that RAS is. Only then can they demand ID, and in most states you have to be actually arrested before you must show ID. Check to see what the ID law is in your state. They put our names in some kind of database where we are listed as troublemakers.
Thank you for your input. However, to demand identification requires an arrest. It falls under the 4th and 5th amendments. To refuse identification is a secondary charge. Look at the Supreme Court case Hale v Henkel. I've had the discussion with judges(privately of course) as a lot of what law enforcement does isn't legal or lawful but if no one fights it who is going to tell them it's wrong? The best thing that could happen for the nation is for individuals to stop taking settlements because yes the money is nice, but a ruling would change the world.
@@johnallen6945 that may be true but legal and lawful are not the same thing. Legal is a distinction for company or business practices. Lawful is the distinction for live interactions. It is why, "Person" is a corporate distinction where as "man/woman" is a constitutional distinction.
@@johnallen6945 never forget the definition of Statutory Law, "That form of law which uses statutes rather than constitutions or judicial decisions." If you can't even use the constitution, it is unconditional by definition.
The ONLY problem here is the same one we have with 90% of officers today. That problem? Most cops have zero communication skills. They're the kids in school that you wondered how they will make it through life..................
They can't. Most statutes are in contradiction to law. The definition of, "Statutory Law - That form of law which uses statutes rather than constitutional law or judicial decisions." I appreciate the question.
@@leroirobinson-grant5885 I guess I used the wrong phrase! I think the question should have been! Will they ever be capable of learning constitutional law?
