When I was 16 i remember I fell into the draws in it with berserk so i started to read them both... gosh i tought it was cool to read... but... i became a philosopher...
I know that some are a drastic change to the original character, but they are called reinterpretations for a reason, so it is totally valid because the same works presented are different in tone, approach, story, everything
This video came into my recommendation back then and because of that I decided to read Vagabond, came back here after a while just to say it was one of the best manga reading experience I've ever had, for once YT algorithm did something good..
When I saw it in the Drama genre, I was very scared, because I thought that Otsu would die, but thank God that’s not the case. I really didn't like the ending at all.
Когда я увидел в жанрах "Драма" ,я очень испугался ,ибо думал ,что Оцу умрет ,но слава богу ,что это не так. Правда концовка мне вообще не понравилась.
Its so mindblowing that out of thousands only 2 other mangas are comparable to vagabond..berserk and vinland saga..the 3 of these are deff 3 of the best mangas EVER and my ranking would be berserk then vagabond and then vinland saga
As a child I lived with cartoons, when I was 7 years old on holiday, during the time I was playing basketball, this cartoon happened on television, it was immediately love at first sight and it became one of my favourites. 15 years old, first year of high school, in the most terrible period of my life, I bought all the volumes of the manga because I heard positive things about it. The moment I was ready to call it quits, I decided to start this manga. I'm 17 years old, I'm a happy person.
Honestly, Takehiko Inoue is extremely overrated. Mainly, Inoue stands out, because he draws in a realistic style, which only a few manga artists use. But his work is very stiff, mechanical, and repetitive. Lacking life, style, and imagination. It's a bit hard to explain, but I'll try. First, when it comes to drawing actions or movements of the figure, he is quite subpar and often lacks dynamic. He is fairly good at drawing heads, but I don't think the range of expressions conveyed through them are particularly broad or effective - it also has many blank, hard-to-read stares. That's why, his art lacks life. He suffers from a lack of style because of his reliance on realism with relatively little exaggeration / cartooning, and general stiffness. Also he has lack of imagination, because he conveys only realistic subject matters, and rarely if ever he gets inventive with incidental details, everything is purely functional and minimalist - backgrounds are simple and mostly empty, despite the use of many small lines.
