That new element part is such buillshit. Yeah, ok, Tony is a genius. But nobody sets up a particle accelerator in their living room, and does it. It's so stupid.
Thanks for the video…I quit my job in various utility technician jobs to go back to school for electrical engineering in order to work on power systems for utilities…I had no idea at the time that power systems engineering was a hard degree to find…I don’t want to take all of these side classes to find what area to go into…I knew when I started and am wondering if this might not get me to where I want to go
Caves are not typically warm… especially ones that have a lot of water. The walls are usually damp and cold. Which is shown in another episode when senku almost freezes trying to stay in water long enough for the level to rise and he escape a pit.
Maybe the propulsion is actually is from Ion thrusters, ION thrusters on spacecraft and satellites consume around 7 KW/s, and can change the volosities of a satellite by several km/s while consuming little fuel compared to the weight of the aircraft. Tony's Ark reactor generates a rediculous amount of power for such a tiny aircraft ( 250 - 300 kg). Since Tony's reactor is ridiculously efficient and practically ignores some laws of thermodynamics, if we apply the same principle to the power generation for the thrusters then it might be possible to propel himself by ionizing the air in the atmosphere in his thrusters at a rediculous power and pace. The only question for me is how can the power travel from his chest to his legs without melting the wires. But hey the whole thing is a speculation, just wanted to share and see if anyone has any takes on this, I'm not knowledgeable in this.
The exact moment where the "killer robot" burst through the door and scares the crap out of Penny is one of the funniest moments of the series for me.🤣
Wolverine's skeleton should've been implanted with vibranium, because it's not poisonus, it'll make him almost unstoppable and it can't manipulated by Magneto.
Hey pary it's been a while since you have reacted to engineering scenes in movie's. I do have some u can look into if u have the time e.g mission impossible dead reckoning theres a ton of tech AI and computers. Then black panther wakanda forever theres some cool tech to react to.
I remember reading a comment a while ago saying that at one point in the comics Captain America's shield was successfully broken apart but it was reforged by asgardian blacksmiths. During their re-construction of the shield they added uru metal to it allowing the shield to become enchanted.
Generally in academia in cases like this, Sheldon would have to share credit with the student. He can get in a lot of trouble if the student contributes to the study and is not included in the paper (as long as it can be proven, of course). And generally there's no reason for professors to not include students as authors. The exception would be if the contribution is very minor, e.g. the undergrad who washed the beakers or any similar grunt work.
This is what happens when you try to judge things out of context. You look like an ass when the comments section has to correct your shitty analysis. Watch the show if you wanna comment on it. Dont just pick a random episode and think your know it all attitude is gonna suffice. You missed many things the very first commentors picked you apart on. But whatever...me me me over quality.
If u watched the whole show ud know they dont have the engineering skill required to make useful guns...they could at best make a tranq gun...pretty sure an entire turret gun was out of the question
I’ve watched quite a few of your videos now and have heard your thoughts on professors not giving a crap about their students learning. Must be vastly different cultures because I obtained my Bachelors degrees in Australia and we couldn’t have asked for better or more supportive lecturers and educators. ❤
You clearly did not watch the film. Also, you are an electrical engineer not a robotic engineer. Your belief that a company being funded is equal to the public desiring what that company will produce is wildly incorrect. In the United States. ALL robotic and AI companies have been funded by the government and government grants. The government doesn’t care what the public wants, it cares what is going to help the US make money. This system can be very dangerous, especially with the point we are at today with technological advances. Btw, his car wasn’t on tires- it was on spheres.
Mechanical engineering guy here. Fluid engineering is part of it and so of aerospace engineering. Secondly, About young’s modulus, its a part of material engineering which is again part of mechanical engineering’s bachelor’s program. As far as i know his bachelor’s was in mechanical engineering and masters in Aerospace. That’s why he know this.
Spoiler about senku's voice. The reason the why-man is using senku's voice is because senku was the first one to transmit radio signals in the stone world and so the why man picked up the signals on the moon and replicated senku's voice.
No spoilers but, a lot of your predictions gor the medusa were spot on. A big plot point in the manga's final arc was (minor spoiler) to make a bettery for the medusa because it rsn out of juice.
Nano tech is lazy story writing and it's basically magic or real life CGI. They don't even explain how it works, they just say "nano-tech". And they don't mention how he can walk normally carrying the suit with him when he's not in the suit.
To be fair, the Medusa device has not survived with its battery for 3,XXX years as far as we know. THAT specific device was dropped down only a few hundred years ago, it probably dropped fully charged, and the islanders used it in much smaller burst than its planet-sized max radius.
Your predictions are really close, one person said 67/100, I think I'd say more like 80 or 90. As for Kasekage Gaara vs Police Chief Toph, I think they're roughly matched in power so I think it would come down to who can outsmart the other and I think in terms of a 1 on 1 fight- Toph has the experience, she's a master improviser, and she would be more than willing to fight dirty if she had to, while Gaara has lost on a number of occasions specifically because he was outsmarted, he even lost his tailed beast because he was outsmarted. I'd say Toph would win if Garra can't transform into the Tailed Beast. In a real fight I think she would outsmart him, force him to bring out the tailed beast form, and she's smart enough to know that this is now an avatar state level threat and then the real question is if she'll escape or go down fighting, ATLA Toph would probably go down fighting but old Toph would know when to quit, I'm not really sure what Police Chief Toph would do, I think it would probably depend on the exact situation. I could imagine Toph insulting Gaara either on purpose or on accident and really hitting a nerve. And of Gaara is in a particularly bad mood that could turn into a 1 on 1 fight. If Gaara's pride is on the line and he's in a bad enough mood to get in a fight over it, I think he would refuse help and be determined to take down Toph by himself. If there's some kind of misunderstanding and Toph insults Gaara on purpose and the misunderstanding isn't cleared up, I think Police Chief Toph might take Gaaras retaliation as good enough evidence that she's right and be determined to take him down by any means necessary, so if he transforms I imagine she would recognise that he's now an avatar level threat and find a way to get Republic City Aang to deal with it (either by running away and regrouping later or perhaps he's nearby) in which case we now have Aang in his prime vs a tailed beast which is an entirely different question. If instead there's some kind of misunderstanding, Police Chief Toph insults Kasekage Gaara on accident, and it escalates enough that he needs to transform, I think she would try to deescalate the situation either because she realised she messed up of because she realised she's in serious danger or both.
Weird that you think that aerospace engineers wouldn't know about liquids in pipes, given navier-stokes,reynolds' numbers. Maybe the F in CFD is the hint!? Great videos though. Always interesting to see a different viewpoint.
2:23 I think there are a type of ants that actually “grow” their own food but I don’t know if it counts bc idk if it’s in the same way we grow ours. I’m not too familiar with this but it’s the first thing that came to mind
I was attacked with EMP several times, changed batteries over 10 times alternators computers. Anyone can recommend a Electrical Engineer for Tests for Insurance Claim?!
9:43 - Actually, as a rule, we DO transfer massive amounts of data perfectly and losslessly every day. Modern computers would not work if we couldn't! All the software running on my machine, and most other computers and phones now, is downloaded from servers. If that string of bits is not transmitted accurately, apps would fail to work! Hundreds of millions of online purchases and financial transactions take place every day. If every account number, purchase number, credit card number, etc, was not transmitted accurately, there'd be financial chaos! So, basically, there are two types of data transmission - uncorrected and error-corrected. Uncorrected means you just send the data stream and cross your fingers - this is almost never used in practise and hasn't been for ages. Anything sent over the internet has multiple levels of error correction - every byte or few bytes has a parity bit added which can detect if a single bit is wrong. Larger blocks of data get CRC checksums added to them that must match the actual data sent. If any of these fail, the system will request that block be resent. These multiple levels of redundancy are why you can download apps that are many gigabytes and have them run perfectly! As far as compression, there are two types - lossless and lossy. Lossy compression is used where the actual data is not vital and a quality loss can be tolerated - things like audio and video are commonly compressed this way. Generally, a high compression rate can be achieved before the quality loss is noticeable, but over-compression definitely becomes noticeable. Lossless compression involves ways to compress data while being able to restore an exact copy of the original. Data compression like a ZIP file is one example. There are also lossless audio and video compression algorithms. The most basic example of a lossless compression is to take, say, a string of 20 zeroes in a file, and record that as (20×0) instead of 00000000000000000000. So, what Richard invents in this series is basically a super-efficient lossless compression, combined with a very efficient search algorithm that can work with the compressed data.
00:08] 🌌 The video aims to assess the scientific accuracy of "The Big Bang Theory" by analyzing its portrayal of scientific concepts. 01:16] 🎓 Engineers and physicists often struggle to admit they're wrong or consider alternative perspectives due to their focused nature. 02:46] 🛠 Collaborating on research projects with friends is discouraged for efficiency and professional boundaries. 03:42] 🍫 The show humorously depicts engineers as the "Oompa Loompas of science," executing visions conceived by others. 04:21] 🚀 A character's discussion of a payload support structure highlights the clash between theoretical knowledge and practical engineering. 05:04] 📜 Academic qualifications do not necessarily guarantee the best decision-making in technical fields. 06:10] 🤔 There's frustration when someone undermines your work, fixing perceived flaws without understanding the full context. 08:46] 📺 Despite exaggerations, "The Big Bang Theory" offers an entertaining portrayal of physicist-engineer dynamics.
If you are going to make video about what if type things video, I would love to see you reacting Kamen Rider Build in science perspective. It's a show about physics and alien techs , although the show is children show so I am not sure about science stuff are accurate or not. But it would be really cool to see your what if scenery about "what if we live in that world".
