I love zelda as a series even with the evolution of gameplay. I'm definitely looking forward to this. I've seen a lot of ppl complaining about the art style or the game play itself and honestly, I was hoping for just this. Didnt expect to play as zelda! But I can't wait.
I think you can only build a few things. She has little triangles that disappear when you place an item and it seems like some of them cost two triangles so there might be different costs for different items.
@@mateus53415 you’re right that it was first conceived of by Nintendo. Also, Nintendo owns 99% of ND Cube’s shares, but the studio itself is comprised of its own employees separate from Nintendo’s EPD groups.
Honestly, it makes sense that they are shifting focus on Switch 2(and possibly an NSO update). They clearly do not need to support Switch 1 anymore, the ball keeps rolling hard. Especially Mario where one would expect internal developmet, but all the external devs surprisingly came back for their part(RPG was made by what is appearently a Square C-team of sorts, Ttyd is IS as always and M&L has at least part of the original team from Alphadream on board.)
@@AzureOtsu yeah I think there’s a chance it’s all in-house, but the 2021 remakes were done in collab with Mages, a smaller Japanese studio. I think it’s equally likely that following their collaboration in 2021, Nintendo deemed them reliable partners and decided to proceed with a new title together.
This is something I always try to get through to people. People always think Nintendo is able to release so many games just because they aim for lower level graphics or because they're just better than other companies. In reality it takes Nintendo just as long to make games as anyone else; It was 6 years between BOTW to TOTK, 4 years between Mario Maker 2 and Mario Wonder, 5 years between Splatoon 2 and 3. We almost always get just one smash bros, animal crossing, 3D Mario, and Mario Kart game per generation. Those are Nintendo's core series and it takes forever for new games to come out. What makes Nintendo different is they have so many partner developers to make spinoffs, side games and smaller games in between Nintendo's big releases. Which is exactly what we all want. Nintendo wouldn't be nearly as fun if all we had were mainline AAA games like Odyssey and BOTW; having so much different games to play is part of what makes them so special. Of course not all of them are going to be of the same quality, but the choice is great.
@@Pyrple very well said. And I also think this level of foresight allows them to avoid droughts. It also bolsters relations with other corporations which is always a good thing (I also think it’s better than just outright purchasing teams).
Absolutely yes, the AA approach with lower budget games from partners supervised by Nintendo workers is such a great idea, they don't have to put huge AAA bugdets on partners, got the creative grip, and get a steady release of more scaled down but amazing games...
1) the speedrun is done by minimini352 2) smh Nintendo announced the Famicom Detective Club game today, but iirc, the 2021 remakes were handled by Mages (Japanese studio), so probably the point stands that it won’t be primarily done by a Nintendo team
I owned Super Mario Party since it launched, and even though it's been a while, it's not a bad game! It's not the best, but it certainly has it's good parts to keep it from being trash! My family and I loved river survival (we are co-op favs), rhythm action was very unique, and we got to play as Bowser's minions! I hope Jamboree does well to improve on its predecessor and beyond!
I don't think you have to worry about endless beds, since the triangles following Tri diminishes every time Zelda makes an echo, so she can probably only create a certain number of echoes at a time (first three, then four, then five). The echoes also start to blink in yellow, probably indicating a time limit. Also: we see the Eastern Palace on the screen so hopefully there will be dungeons in some form! Would be weird to incorporate that landmark without the actual dungeon.
There is a limit to how many echoes you can summon, you can see the triangles following tri which is some form of mana meter and when you summon an echo, those triangles float above the echo. It also shows in the menu how much each will cost. We can see that most regular echoes like boxes or beds cost one shard, the moblin type enemy costs two and the redead costs three. There is a limit even though not explicitly said in the trailer and it seems like the amount each echo costs has been balanced to keep a challenge to the game
At 2:06, you begin to talk about the seemingly limitless power of Zelda’s ability. There is actually a noticeable limit. When Zelda swaps between objects (clip of it is again, a bit after 2:06), we see a small triangle above each object. When these objects are seen in the overworld, again, a small triangle is above them. Whenever Zelda summons something, there is a number of triangles above the object. Whenever Zelda summons something, the amount of triangles following Tri decreases, relative to the cost.
There’s a limit to the items you can place. I’ve seen like 5 RU-vidrs talk about it in their videos. The fairy has 4 little triangles following it, every time something is summoned, one of those triangles stays with the summoned object. Some objects require more than one triangles, like the redead at the end of the trailer. It has three triangles surrounding it
Lack of physical strength? So now we're forgetting about Twilight Princess, Wind Waker, Phantom Hourglass, Ocarina of Time, and important lore from Skyward Sword? And, I know that Hyrule Warriors, officially, is "non-canon", but it still does prove that Zelda can potentially be a total girlboss. And the fact that she isn't in this game, ignoring the fact that she has been before in other canon Zelda games is sexist in my opinion. Girls are NOT weaklings! And you don't need big muscles to be strong! Link already proves that since he's no big macho muscular man himself. Having Zelda throw tantrums at her enemies like a looney tunes character because "She's a girl! Girls are too weak to use a sword or fight physically." is such a sexist and dumb reason to design her this way. With that said, I'm definitely not buying this game for sure because I do NOT support sexism! Sexism is a very bad thing that needs end as it is the very reason why women are so messed up when it comes to men now days. Men keep whining about women treating men unfairly when it was men that have done that to women first. And Princess Peach Showtime with its linearity and this garbage of a game is proof that they're still doing it today. Not saying all men are bad or anything. I'm not. And I love Link. I prefer him too because he's the main hero after all. But for Zelda's first official canon adventure, she is being treated very unfairly. This game could've been better had she been the girlboss she's been before in games like Ocarina of Time, Twilight Princess, Wind Waker, and Phantom Hourglass. They should've followed by Hyrule Warriors example. But instead, we got this piece of trash!
hey maybe before you write an emotional novel, make sure you actually understand what I said dumbass. For real so many clowns exposing their fragility in these comments. Zelda is not as physically strong as Link and that’s just a fact. She is extremely powerful with magic and if you listened and used your brain you would hear I clearly praised them for leaning into this and even suggested another spin-off idea for them to star Zelda with.
Saying Zelda isn't as physically strong as link isn't insulting Zelda, link is crazy strong. Nintendo isn't really a company you need to boycott for sexism XD they've made tonnes of games with female protagonists that haven't been put down for being women. Saying you aren't playing the first (we don't talk about the other one) Zelda game where you can directly play as Zelda because it's sexist is crazy. I feel like the real reason they aren't giving Zelda a sword, at least at the beginning of the game, is to make her gameplay distinct. If Zelda was just a reskin of link, that's kinda lame
@@mememan5466 What we've seen of this game's gameplay so far and what some people keep saying for why that is feels like an insult to me because: 1) We've shown the potential she has a playable character who can fight before with the spinoffs. Those games clearly showed that even with a sword, she doesn't have to play exactly like Link. She can still have her own moveset and gameplay. 2) Strong female protagonists like Samus exists. So people stating Zelda not having a weapon is because of lack of physical strength due to her being a girl is offensive to me. Especially when characters like Samus and even Princess Peach prove that girls can be strong. Not to mention the fact that we literally have female wrestlers in real life who are completely capable of beating up men. Bottom line is, women are just as physically capable as men and I respect that. That is why I get offended so easily when people state things like "a women can not have a sword because women can not fight" or whatever. Maybe this game isn't sexist as maybe Zelda gets a weapon (probably not a sword or least not one Link would normally use, similar to one she has in Twilight Princess) a little later into the game. But making statements saying that she doesn't one because she can not fight due to her being a girl. That is definitely sexist! I hope they show of a weapon for Zelda later on so that players like me don't have to feel so restricted to just using the Tri Rod as I feel like that would get old and boring fast. She definitely has to have more items to use than just the Tri Rod. It'd just be silly and stupid if the Tri Rod is all you use in the game. I do agree with your implication that maybe they didn't want to show off her weapon item that early because they were afraid that people might jump to the conclusion that this just the same usual Zelda game but with Zelda, when it's clearly not. So they wanted people to see that this is definitely different from previous games first, before showing off anything that makes the game feel more like the Zelda we know. And definitely think we get the Tri Rod first as our main item. Sort of like the Sheikah Slate from BotW and Rauru's Arm in TotK. Even in TotK, we still got a Sheikah Slate in the form of the Purah Pad, but without the runes of the last game. I definitely think we start with getting Tri Rod first, then sometime after escaping the castle, as we're adventuring, the game might direct us to more helpful items we can use on our adventure like a weapon for direct combat, hopefully, a instrument item for fast travel, and something that functions like a grappling hook or hookshot as people have pointed out that there are echoes of an object that was hookshot-able in the Link's Awakening remake. Though, based on that trailer, I think we'll probably be stuck with just the Tri Rod for quite a while. But maybe not as long as we think as this game does seem to be very open in that going all over Hyrule with just the Tri Rod is optional and we can go look for the other items at any time after escaping Hyrule Castle. I think Hyrule Castle is likely gonna be our tutorial area. Sort of like the Great Plateau in BotW and the Great Sky Islands in TotK.
@@PJCVita92 they never said that Zelda is weak and especially never said that because she's a girl. They said that she isn't as physically strong as link. link is absurdly strong so being less strong than link isn't a bonus. Zelda having different gameplay makes sense for other reasons too: link holds the triforce of courage so he has the courage to rush into a dangerous situation with nothing but a sword, Zelda holds the triforce of wisdom so she has the intelligence to know that isn't a good idea and she uses other tools to her advantage. I don't think Zelda with a sword would be wrong but it just doesn't seem to fit with her character (besides twilight princess but that Zelda is very different to the one we usually see). I don't think Nintendo is doing this out of sexism, it's just because of how she is most of the time as a character
@@mememan5466 "they never said that Zelda is weak and especially never said that because she's a girl. They said that she isn't as physically strong as link." 🤦Saying she's not as physically strong is literally just a nice way saying she's and because she's a girl. It's literally the same thing. Sexist people just think that "She's not a physically strong" just sounds nicer, when people who are familiar with the sexist mindset know they literally just mean the same thing as "she's weak, she's a girl, what did you expect?", which is why that phrase bothers me because that's literally what they mean. They just try to sugar coat it, thinking they wouldn't get caught or scolded. But they still do because it's literally that blatantly obvious of what they meant. You just don't understand it because you haven't been witness to the sexist mindset as much I have to know that "not as physically strong" (especially when comparing a female to a boy who isn't really all that muscular himself) means the same as "she's weak because she's a girl". Or you, yourself are sexist so much that you insist that there's nothing wrong with saying such blatantly obvious sexist remarks. Especially sexists literally use the phrase their argument of why men a superior the exact same way as this guy did. They literally use phrases like "girls just aren't as physically strong as boys" (sound familiar? because that should.) to justify their sexist viewpoint all the time! What this guy said is sexist! If you can not accept that accusation based on facts, that makes you sexist too! Sorry, but that's the truth! "Zelda having different gameplay makes sense for other reasons too: link holds the triforce of courage so he has the courage to rush into a dangerous situation with nothing but a sword, Zelda holds the triforce of wisdom so she has the intelligence to know that isn't a good idea and she uses other tools to her advantage." Fair point. But her only having and relying solely on the Tri Rod throughout the whole game would be dumb, stupid, and only do more harm to her character than good. Especially, when she's canonically used a sword before. Speaking of... "I don't think Zelda with a sword would be wrong but it just doesn't seem to fit with her character" How does using a sword NOT fit with her character? She literally uses a sword in Twilight Princess. Speaking of... "(besides twilight princess but that Zelda is very different to the one we usually see)." Twilight Princess Zelda IS the same kind of Zelda we usually see! What the hell are you talking about? Just because we don't see the other Zeldas wield a sword, doesn't mean they don't or not ever had one. Or that they're incapable of using a sword. And I know Cadence of Hyrule isn't really canon but we literally see the exact same type of Zelda from this game use bladed weapons like a sword just fine. They wouldn't have made such a indie game spinoff where she has bladed weapon gameplay at all if that version of Zelda like in this game was completely sword incompetent or if a sword didn't suit her character. Why would she even have a sword/rapier at all in canon lore or in any game at all, if Nintendo always felt that such a weapon didn't suit her character? To me that also sounds sexist to assume that using a sword doesn't suit her character just because she's a girl. You realize that swords can actually associate with the virtue of Wisdom too right? Not just Courage and Power. That is why Zelda's gameplay with a sword would be different from Link. As even in direct 1v1 sword combat, there can exist a sense of strategy. Wisdom if you will. I mean, we even just had like three Link games straight already where you had to use your head, your WISDOM for sword combat! If anything, that kind of combat from those three games does NOT suit Link's character! But yet his games had it anyways! "I don't think Nintendo is doing this out of sexism, it's just because of how she is most of the time as a character" Because that's how she's written in most games because the Zelda team is sexist and won't let her just be the girlboss that the canon lore already states that she is!🙄
My main concern with this game is that they are repeating a mistake they made in Tears of the Kingdom. In totk it could take you a long time to find the one item you wanted to throw or fuse to an arrow - well not exactly a long time, but long enough to break the rhythm of gameplay. And it seems this next game is gonna have the same problem. It pains me because Nintendo has such clever level designers yet they can't find a way to make sandbox menuing faster and more enjoyable.
The only thing that does worry me is the translations/Eng localizers might add woke crap or put in pronouns in the game. Keep it the way nintendo wrote it.
Bro what 💀 firstly, the localising team only has power over the text in the game, not the gameplay so they can't change much. Also what the fuck do you mean with pronouns? Every game _has_ pronouns in, even though you don't think about it, words like: you, me, he, and she are all pronouns. A game with no pronouns in it would sound like it was written by a caveman. If you're talking about choosing pronouns, that's only for games where you make a character. Since Zelda is an established character, you don't choose her pronouns same as you never had to choose links. You're delusional bro
