At RunningXpert we believe in what is good about running!
Therefore, you can find product videos, advertising videos, guides and product reviews by RunningXperts' own running experts.
Be the first to hear about new running shoes, heart rate monitors, equipment and much, much more. We test what is on the market and we present you with future products.
Feel free to subscribe on all of our channels to stay updated!
Is ASICS Nimbus 26 also a stability shoes? Coz we don't have any stores here that can GAIT analyze my foot. So I would prolly go for comfort with stability shoes to buy as my first shoes to start running. So I'm torn between Novablast 4s or Nimbus 25-26?
Hey, The Pursuit is a highly cushioned trail shoe with some technical ability, and it should be the closest to the Speedgoat. The closest thing to a Clifton from Topo might be the new Atmos. www.runningxpert.com/en/topo-athletic-men-s-atmos-m069-gretel.html Topo doesn't really have a soft foam experience like the Hoka does. But the Atmos and maybe the new Specter 2 coming out soon would be comparable. It will probably be lighter and more bouncy though. Hope this helps. Lars
I'd love to know how that shoe is like a nimbus, with it's massive 40 mm stack, squishy ride, 8 mm offset, and extremely stiff (for a non plated shoe) with a pronounced rocker. the shoe in the video has a much lower stack, a firm ride, half the offset, and is more flexible, with a rocker but not as noticeable because the shoe isn't stiff as a board like the nimbus.
Hey "Could be a little bit compared to the Nimbus from Asics" does not mean exactly like it. In September 2022, when this video was released, Nimbus 24 was the current Nimbus. It was a 36-26 drop shoe, and looking away from the offset, they have roughly the same amount of foam in the shoes. It is all about creating parallels that explain what type of shoe this is. And without a question, the Phantom 2, has the same place in the line-up as a Nimbus. They are both highly cushioned neutral daily trainers, which makes them comparable, at least in my book. Lars
Hey! There are many from On, and personally I really like walking and standing in On shoes. If it was up to me I would probably walk in a Cloudmonster or a Cloudstratus, as they have plenty of cushion, but aren't too soft. The Monster will have more breathability if you like that, and the stratus will have more space for your foot. If its a bit too epensive, then plder version are available on our site in some sizes, and the cloudrunner should also be a nice, stable and comfortable option with a lower price. Hope this helped. You are welcome to ask more questions :D Lars
I just had to drop a comment about the Saucony shoes. The endorphins are by far the worst shoes I´ve ever owned. Lost 3 toenails with those on. They have the best sole I´ve ever felt, super springy and bouncy but still cushioned enough for me to run long distance without getting wrecked. But DAMN are they aweful in their shape and design. For whatever reason they decided to make them extreamly narrow by the toe-tips and wide by the metarsals. Essentially what this does is, it forces your foot into a wedge every step u take because the shoe wont hold ur foot in place but rather let it slip right out into the pointy bit of it. Furthermore they have a poorly placed plate in the sole which doesn´t support the middle of your foot but rather closer to the outside thus creating insane pronation unless you activlely force supination for each step you take. I get it, all shoes aren´t ment for all feet but from an anatomical standpoint saucony makes the worst shoes of all the brands, adidas included.
I've tested version 1 of the Wave Rebellion Pro at the running track. You'll get the most of benefits from these shoes if you are a midfoot striker. Regrettably, as a forefoot striker, I was 42 seconds slower on a 5K, compared to the fastest pair of carbon plated shoes Peba/Pebax midsole based I've previously tested, which were the Puma Deviate Nitro Elite v.1.
Hey. They are both great shoes, but very different. Both are ment for longer distances and daily traning. The question you need to ask yourself is, do I like more stability (Kayano 29), or a softer feel underfoot (Kayano 30)? Lars
In essence, whichever fits you. But some people with flat feet like a bit of support around the arch, and then the Cloudrunner would be the best option. If you want to be in a neutral shoe, then I would suggest the Cloudstratus as a stable and good shoe with a wider fit, and the Cloudmonster if you want a more tight fit. Lars
Thanks for the awesome video content. I prefer traditional stability running shoes due to over pronation (Medial post etc..) Kayano 29 was my favorite shoe for this but the Kayanos have changed a lot. In the current market which is the closest shoe to the Kayano 29? (NB 860 V12, Gt 2000 12 perhaps?)
860 and the GT series are some great options. If you want a very traditional stability shoe there is also the option to look at the Horizon from Mizuno, or the Arahi or Gaviota from Hoka, or the Structure from Nike. The Brooks adrenaline GTS is also a shoe that many like. Hope this helps :D Lars
Hey. Mr Olesen. After having on both shoes, one on each foot I can say this: The Novablast 4 is softer in the heel. The amount of stack in the forefoot is almost the same, and I just think the slightly more bouncy Mach 6 foam makes the Mach 6 feel a bit more substantial there. Two great shoes, and the biggest difference is the forefoot geometry, which is a bit more pronounced in the Novablast 4. Hope this helps. Lars
Thanks for your comment. Our test of the More v4 wasn't done at the same time, and wasn't as fresh in our minds as the 1080v13. So we made a mistake here. The 1080v13 is softer than the More v4. It will be fun to see if the More v5 has managed to become even softer! Lars
Hey. If we are only talking about how stiff a shoe is, then I would say the Guide 16 is the most stable, followed by the Guide 17. Kayano 30 and 31 is so similar that I don't really know if there is a difference in stability. Lars
I have Supernova Solution and Arahi 7. Solution feel lighter, although heavier, from its PEBA based foam. But stability is not that great since the foam is a little too soft, easy to bend when wearing.It’s good when running in straight line. Arahi 7 is a little too hard with too little flex. The stability is very good but it’s quite uncomfortable to wear. The foam is also one of the weakness. It’s not bad but the responsive is low compare to more modern shoes like Novablast, Supernova.
Brooks Adrenaline 22 or 23 GTS is my go to shoe. It’s the only one that has helped me with absolutely horrible plantar fasciitis pain. So painful I can barely walk. 2nd is Brooks Glycerin 20 and 21 GTS which is also amazing. I have the Kayano 29s , Cumulus 24s , Saucony Guide 16s , New Balance Max V4 fresh foam and none of them helped. Kayano is my 3rd favorite shoe. The rest was a huge waste of money 💴 😢
Thanks for the comment! Look at it this way. If you now have gotten rid of your plantar fascities, then having several different pairs of running shoes that you can rotate is by far the best way to hinder injuries from happening. Apart from not training too much, of course. Also remember that injuries are very subjective, and what works on one runner might have the opposite effect on the next one. During my time working in a specialty running store I knew many who got knee pain from firm shoes, but I met just as many who got knee pain from soft shoes. I also know many who finally got a shoe to work for their plantar fascitis, and it was the softest shoe on the market. I'm just saying, it is very subjective. Hope you are having a great day! Lars
@@RunningXpert it’s really just what works best for the individual. I did so much research and it was by chance that I stumbled across the ones that are helpful for me. You guys do great work here and I’m grateful for your work. People who’ve never had plantar fasciitis really don’t understand how painful it is. Mine was too the extreme
@@saulmiller71 if you haven't worn the other ones that much I recommend selling them on vinted you will get a really good price for them, if you have only ran in them once drop the price by 30/40 in your currency. Or whatever you think they are worth
Yeah...I actually don't find the Superblast super stable. It's amazing...but my foot starts to hurt during long runs (over pronation). I 100% think the GT2000 12 should he here though...kick a** shoe.
Yowana said he thought the 860v14 was one of the best New Balance shoes he's tried, stability or not. The Guide looks great except that they kept the uninspiring foam in it.
Thanks for the insights! We haven't been able to test it out yet, so we can't say if it is good or not. But historically, the 860 is an awesome stability shoe. Lars
Highly subjective, and depends on what you like. If you want a softer more comfortable ride, then go for the Kayano 31. If you like a more forward rolling gait, then try the Guide 17. And so on. It all depends on what you like. Lars
Brooks Adrenaline 22 or 23 GTS is most excellent for flat feet and if you have plantar fasciitis it’ll help you with that too. Too much foam is not good speaking from experience and a real Podiatrist also said that.
Remember, flat feet doesn't mean you need a stability shoe. i would use the shoe that feels the best for you. So what type of running shoe do you like? Lars
Hey Edwin. Two great shoes. Historically the 860 has been a more traditional stability shoe while the Vongo has given a less intrusive type of stability. But I haven't been able to see the 860v13, so I really can't say what is better at what. I imagine the Vongo v6 might be a bit stiffer from heel to toe. Sorry I can't help with more, but maybe someone else can respond to this comment? Lars
I just got these in after owning a pair of the 3s. I loved the 3s but tbh the 4s are way better. I don't understand the negative reviews talking about less pop, these are really responsive and I get great ground feel compared to the 3s which made me feel like i was standing on top of the foam.
Thanks for your comment! I agree. PWRRUN HG is a firmer foam, but it has a very high energy return, much higher than PWRRUN PB. I think some people like a bouncy feel, but bouncy isn't necessarily fast. I really enjoy the mix of HG and PB, which makes the feel both fun and fast. Lars
Hey :D You can always use them in the gym, they will work like a charm on the treadmill but I'm not sure I would advise you to lift in them. This is mostly because you waste cushioning by loading a running shoe when doing squats or heavy lifting. Hope this helps. Lars
Yes, two very different shoes you talk about there. I think people will in general like one or the other, and not both :D We also think the Cloudsurfer is more of a jogger type of shoe, more comfort and softness, and less speed and agility. Thanks for your insights. Lars
Question : Are the rebelliom flash 2 good for daily training??? I have boston 12 for my fast daily training, i'm looking flash2 for daily training with slow to fast pace
I would consider the Boston 12 more a daily trainer than the Flash 2. If you ask me, the Flash 2 is more a tempo shoe that some might use for races as well. Lars
Three great shoes. We haven't had the possibility to try the Peg 41 yet, but if it is anything like the Peg 40 it will be a good versatile shoe. The Rebel v4 is softer and very light, and the Novablast 4 should be softer and more plush while still having a very nice rockered shape. Lars
Thanks for sharing. It's okey to have favorites, I do too, and Saucony is a great company that makes a great running shoes! a great place to start if you want to start running. Lars
Hey. It depends on what you want. Tempus is a fast and light running shoe with som stability support. The Kaiha road is as I understand a takedown of the New Balance Fresh Foam X More, and will be good, but with a takedown version there are always some concerns about durability as they normally use cheaper ingreadiences. The Puma Magnify 2 is great, soft, but not as soft as the Kaiha, I think. So it depends on what you want. Lars
@@RunningXpert I am looking for the shoe with the greatest softness and cushioning, and I can get those 3 models at the same price,thanks for answering!🙏
Hey ;D If you like a soft shoes with some arch support then I would recommend this. but it all comes down to taste, some will find it perfect, I find that I like shoes that are little bit firmer for walking and standing. It all depends on what you like. Lars
Hey :D I would suggest the Cloudrunner or the Cloudflyer if you are a overpronator. But If you want a bit of extra cushion as well, then the Cloudstratus is a very stable neutral shoe. Lars
Currently have the saucony tempest as my daily and race day ( 2 seperate pairs). Could the 31 be used as a half marathon race day? Unfortunately I need a stability shoe so I know the options are limited
Hey. That depends on what you want from a half marathon. If you want speed, then you probably shouldn't get a Kayano 31. If you want comfort, then Kayano 31 is the way to go. Now if you want speed you should probably try to find something lighter. The Tempus is maybe the best option here if you are not looking at more stable marathon shoes. I would use the Tempus for faster runs, and then get a daily trainer that focuses more on comfort for the everyday miles. Is there a certain reason why you are not using neutral shoes, apart from overload injuries? Lars
@@RunningXpert I guess when I started my running journey I was an overpronater with flat feet. I’ve worked on my form and technique over the last few years but I’ve always gone stability since I started to kinda protect(?) myself. Haven’t tried running in a neutral in years
