Welcome! My constant interest in building a learning community in classrooms led me to make RU-vid videos to enhance the understanding of my students. The video tutorials in this channel are mainly created to provide online support for students in "GIS" and "Statistical Data Science" in Public Health from Beginner to Advanced levels and are not intended for monetary compensation. The video tutorials are designed in a logical order (from start to finish of the project), are easy to follow, and are particularly useful for visual learners. For more information regarding the content of the courses, please visit sites.google.com/view/healthgis Thank you, Abe Mollalo, PhD
*P.S. The links to the data used in videos have been provided in the descriptions, and the data are freely downloadable.
Does anyone know how I would do a very similar ANOVA but with data collected from 6 groups at 12 different timepoints? (i.e. plant height in 6 treatments; 3 plants per treatment, collected at 13 time points)
that was an excellent explanations thank you for this tutorial. kindly consider putting one more on shapefiles, there was agap where you included the area of interest in the arcgis. thanks again
When I used the eucledian tool, I did not get the same esult and the output was not in different classifications but instead in a colo scheme from lo wto high. Why?
Hello, the research link you provided based on AHP, Table 5 there had values like 0.156, 0.118, 0.178 and so on form DEM, Slope, and Rainfall and so on. But here in your slide, its tiny bit different, is it because assumed just these 5 values and and found average yourself, or did you referred other books or papers?
I'm new to statistics and learning bunch of things for weeks, your video made a lot of sense to me. Thank you so much for the easier explanation, it was great with examples and some of it fitted my research data.
Thank you for sharing this tutorial, very helpful. I got a question in following, how can I get the path and row number for my area of interest? Thank you!
Hi! Thanks for the explanation, it was very clear so I could apply it to my own work. I wanted to point out something though, when you reclassify the DEM from 2 - 10, you are assigning the value 10 to "flat areas", but isn't the DEM about topographic altitudes? Shouldn't you consider lower numbers as lower altitudes, and not as flat areas (isn't that why you have the slope there)? I say this because in my area, for example, I have the flat areas in higher altitudes (plains) and they can't get flooded even if they are flat, so I had to modify things a bit to get a more accurate end result (according to my area, of course). Anyways, thank you so much for explaining your process in such a detail way, it was really helpful!
