Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is the premier particle physics lab in the United States. Founded as the National Accelerator Laboratory in 1967, it was renamed after physicist Enrico Fermi in 1974. Since its inception, Fermilab has been a world leader in particle physics, with discoveries including the bottom quark, top quark and tau neutrino, three of the elementary particles that make up our universe.
Fermilab is home to approximately 1,700 scientists, engineers, technicians and support staff, and hosts about 2,500 visiting scientists from around the world. The laboratory is operated by the Fermi Research Alliance for the U.S. Department of Energy. More information can be found at www.fnal.gov.
ive heard this explanation before (as its the correct one) but Im unsure of how the light exits at exactly the same angle, what function of the wave 'remembers' the incident angle?
What the heck you mean that photons are ageless and experience the cosmos at the same time on its path? The observable universe is more than 90 billion light years so a photon can travel that distance in no time everywhere, anytime all at once? My goodness that’s just mind blowing. I wish I was born as a photon to experience that. Einstein really read God’s mind. 😭😭😭
Do photons experience time?... Yes: Because the speed of light is an ideal constant of the theory, that can vary, whilst passing through various mediums, in reality. So there is a certain "resistence" / Btw. we should stop insinuating truth, if we can't tell it. Approaching the speed of light is not moving with the speed of light, as it is like an infinite asymptotic approximation. The speed of light is on the crest, the dimensional barrier, separating 2 valleys. The tip of that crest is not like a blade (ideal, perfect c), but more like a "jittered path".
The first revelation is that there is no relativivistic mass. The 2nd is that not all physicists do not know what is going on or can't explain it. The third is that some people should not even think about going into physics. I am not speaking about anyone else but me when I say that I should have gotten a degree in woodworking. I could have had class. I could have been a contender. I could have been somebody. I could have made my own chair.
Earth's activities transmitted to the Star in 4 years? What happens to the Sun's placement of it announce light speed, if light is generated and to match the circumstance of observations?
For your information - a month and a half ago an interesting paper appeared, which completely revealed all the secrets of neutrinos: "Direct derivation of the neutrino mass"
Nice presentation (as usual). I don't know why they expect massive particles for dark matter. I expect electron-size scales, infact I expect it's a frozen sea of electron-positron pairs.
"We have no way to observe anything going on in that region". Said just seconds after stating as a fact that at the center of the black hole is a "singularity". How do you know that what's inside the event horizon is a mystery? What does it even mean for a black hole to have a "center"? A black hole is not an object in space, it IS space. The singularity is not a singularity in space, it's a singularity in time. It's not at the center of space, it's at the end of time.
Could you prove, using nutrions, that the speed of light can be at diffrent speeds based on energy of the partical; Useing zenos paradox some infinitys can be larger than other infinitys so if we imagine the speed of light an an infinity relative to the object moving at the speed of light(because an object moving at the speed of light would have infinite mass) could we observe how var the netruino travled and the speed it must have travled it. Or is the speed of mass more like a set rule where it must take X amount of Time to get to point b. Ps im a highschool student idk what im talking about
Before you even get down to Planck scales, wouldn’t the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle come into play? How are you even going to localize something to that size?
Why we Cant Create Gravity ? I known the anwser , we cant do that , but its interesting , we can manipulate electrical and magnetic field , but with gravity , we cant ,its like time , we cabmnt push a button and make a gravity field ...thats will be cool ,there is no known way to transfor electromagnetic energy to gravity
But if put a litle quatum mechanics in this , its still wrong, couse that mass m is not so simple , that mass after all is Energy too , the Energy of the glouns gluing the quarks + the mass of the particles given by our friend the higgs Field Most of the mass m is just Energy binding couse the higs mass is very little ... Yuo need to take this acount but who knows😊
Well, this scientist I think is just trying to redirect peoples opinions to make them think that this is almost impossible. This technology it’s available but is used by a secret agency on military operations, they don’t want this technology to come out for national security.
Perhaps a more accessible way to think about light speed and the passage of time is to think of certain super hero movies like the Zack Snyder’s Justice League and X Men Days of Future Past. When speedsters, like the Flash, move quickly, everything around them slows down. Forget about the “time”component, and just think about the movement of other objects around them - they slow down to the point that they’re essentially frozen. In the case of photons, things slow down to a complete stop. This way of thinking about it can actually be “visualised” by most people, while the physicist explanation doesn’t give us anything we can easily relate to in the real world.
So when Beetlegeuse goes nova "soon", we will first know because of neutrinos? That is so cool, imagining that every telescope can be trained on Beetlegeuse before it happens. What is the delay? I don't want to miss it. ;)
as a keen but amateur observer for the past 50 years, I never heard of General Relativity predicting Dark Energy. Could someone tell me where Einstein wrote this? Chapter and verse, please. Dr. Lincoln hopes the different energy contributions of different fields will cancel out. I think that in the end, the anomalous observations that have led to the THEORY of Dark Energy will eventually be explained by a change in the behaviour of time over the expansion of the universe.
I assume that physicists expect that neutrinos have mass because they can change from one kind to another when emitted from the sun. Is this because they must experience time if they have mass?
But on a serious note: If neutrinos interact with practically nothing, how do they obtain their speed? Something has to be able to push them, right? Does this push only come from the weak electromagnetic force?
How can you be so certain of the existence of neutrinos? ghost like particles that can "go through a light year of lead before interacting with any matter" with "billions passing through every square centimeter of you and the planet every second without anyone ever noticing them." Your neutrino detectors of ultra pure water underground would seem unlikely to be any more effective at detecting them and the pulses of light that you claim are caused by neutrinos seems to be cherenkov radiation to me, which is caused by em radiation. You say the light is caused by an electron in the water moving faster than the speed of light in water, but why would a near massless and ghost like neutrino cause an electron to not only be displaced from an atom but also to accelerate faster than the speed of light in water?
How do we know that outbound, solar neutrinos are not what is actually causing the red shifting of light from distant galaxies (and not necessarily a big bang)?
because the redshifting of any far object is constant, not dependent on where Earth is around the Sun, ie time of year and hence direction of Solar neutrinos. So, if there was interaction between light and neutrinos , it would show a difference during the year
