Тёмный

Is the weak nuclear force really a force? 

Fermilab
Подписаться 789 тыс.
Просмотров 188 тыс.
50% 1

The weak nuclear force is often said to be the cause of some forms of radioactivity, but is it a force in the traditional sense? In this video, Fermilab's Dr. Don gives us a deeper dive into how the weak force works. It's a mind-blowing interaction in the subatomic world.
Fermilab physics 101:
www.fnal.gov/pub/science/part...
Fermilab home page:
fnal.gov

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

28 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 944   
@GabrielGABFonseca
@GabrielGABFonseca 11 месяцев назад
Honestly, I would genuinely appreciate a longer video going more in-depth about the Weak Force.
@lucasmcguire1554
@lucasmcguire1554 3 месяца назад
PBS spacetime has a few good videos on the topic, although they are not easy to grasp and they give you an idea on why this stuff is so notoriously difficult to understand properly.
@morninggloryvisuals
@morninggloryvisuals 24 дня назад
I second that.
@calmeilles
@calmeilles 11 месяцев назад
The "deeper dives" into these subjects are always the most fascinating. I'd like to see more.
@causewaykayak
@causewaykayak 11 месяцев назад
i second that wholeheartedly .
@KnightsWithoutATable
@KnightsWithoutATable 11 месяцев назад
@@causewaykayak I vote Aye on this motion
@UQuark0
@UQuark0 11 месяцев назад
It's funny how this 'no one wants technicalities on teh internets' idea still exists. Nothing is too technical - more or less every level can be explained in an interesting and entertaining form
@causewaykayak
@causewaykayak 11 месяцев назад
Very true
@causewaykayak
@causewaykayak 11 месяцев назад
@@simonebest6013 Simone (?) you have Split an Infinitive which is a class of Sin entirely in its own category. To pay for this gross atrocity - when the sun vanishes instantly in compliance with your wishes - You wont be allowed to witness the event 👇🏿 so never be quite sure .... sorry about that but it's your own fault.
@whatdamath
@whatdamath 11 месяцев назад
this is great! I'll be referencing this video when I need to cut corners with the weak force from now on
@Abc-dn2zu
@Abc-dn2zu 11 месяцев назад
Please make a video related to weak force in detail
@emceeboogieboots1608
@emceeboogieboots1608 11 месяцев назад
Onya Anton👍
@mateovncnt7411
@mateovncnt7411 11 месяцев назад
Petrov!❤
@okman9684
@okman9684 11 месяцев назад
Hello wonderful person 🙋‍♂️
@SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi
@SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi 11 месяцев назад
​@@okman9684Haha only Anton thinks we are wonderful people.
@KafkaExMachina
@KafkaExMachina 11 месяцев назад
Now I am extremely intrigued to know how the electroweak force was discovered and what the combination of the two forces as actually the same force means when talking about particle interactions.
@moocowpong1
@moocowpong1 11 месяцев назад
It’s a wild picture, much weirder than you might initially think. I’d love to see a video covering it.
@MrREX-sy4rz
@MrREX-sy4rz 11 месяцев назад
Make a video on quantum physics pls vote.... 😢
@london8732
@london8732 11 месяцев назад
​@@moocowpong1 PBS Space-time Electroweak theory video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qKVpknSKgE0.html
@RealMajor66
@RealMajor66 11 месяцев назад
+1 🙂
@michaelsommers2356
@michaelsommers2356 11 месяцев назад
It means that at extremely high energies, there is only one electroweak force, not separate electrical, magnetic, and weak forces. Which I guess many not be very helpful, but that's it.
@Mysoi123
@Mysoi123 11 месяцев назад
For those still puzzled by the concept of mass uncertainty, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle states that the duration in time and uncertainty in a particle's energy are connected through a constant, ΔE Δt ≥ ħ/2. Additionally, as Einstein demonstrated with his famous equation E=mc², mass can be understood as a measurement of energy. Consequently, mass also carries inherent uncertainty. This implies that the shorter a particle's lifespan, the wider the spread of its probability function becomes. Considering the weak boson particles, which decay rapidly, their mass also becomes probabilistic. Interestingly, even photons, conventionally regarded as massless, can exhibit mass if they engage in an interaction involving highly energetic photons that decay into a pair of matter and antimatter electrons. Thus, the transient photon, although typically short-lived, may acquire mass due to the inherent uncertainty.
@Posesso
@Posesso 11 месяцев назад
Thanks! Extremely convenient to add imo
@HellopeepsStavros
@HellopeepsStavros 11 месяцев назад
Sounds right, i always thought that there was more to the photon that met the eye. ! hahahhaaa
@LadyAnuB
@LadyAnuB 11 месяцев назад
A photon is massless when it comes to special relativity but it has energy when it interacts with particles and, therefore, acts as a massed object
@StarkRG
@StarkRG 11 месяцев назад
@@LadyAnuB They act like particles with momentum, not mass. (p=mv is only a close approximation of momentum when dealing with very massive objects moving at very slow speeds (compared to the speed of light).
@LadyAnuB
@LadyAnuB 11 месяцев назад
@@StarkRG This is something that I need to brush up on considering this was ~30 years ago for me
@COTU9
@COTU9 11 месяцев назад
The other weak force you don't hear physicist's mention is the Bar force. It's supposed to keep me from picking up a candy bar when I'm trying to lose weight. It rarely shows up but when it does, it has to be pretty strong to work.
@rreiter
@rreiter 11 месяцев назад
They also have yet to explain why skittles occur in a short burst of high frequency. There must be more than the weak force at play here... and how do they account for all the red ones?
@sydhenderson6753
@sydhenderson6753 11 месяцев назад
Weak interactions tend to take a long time because of what you said...except for the top quark, which decays so rapidly that it doesn't have time to form hadrons. The reason for this is that has more mass than two W and/or Z particles in their normal mass range so it doesn't have to rely on the low probability of producing them that the lower-mass quarks do. It does so directly, and since the speed of a force depends on the mass of the force boson, the reaction is far faster than the strong interaction.
@sydhenderson6753
@sydhenderson6753 11 месяцев назад
There is also at least one quark produced during the decay, usually but not always a bottom quark.
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
That makes a lot of sense actually. Thank you
@mrtienphysics666
@mrtienphysics666 11 месяцев назад
Thanks Don, you are an expert who can explain. Very rare on the internet.
@mariotabali2603
@mariotabali2603 11 месяцев назад
Very rare on Earth
@Posesso
@Posesso 11 месяцев назад
rare but strong? ;)
@seionne85
@seionne85 11 месяцев назад
Less than ten minutes and I learned more than hours of lectures. Thank you for these Dr. Lincoln
@Starchface
@Starchface 11 месяцев назад
Dr. Don, more "deep dives" would be great. I always learn something from your videos. The production and the presentation are excellent. Thanks so much for the magnificent content all these years. You are appreciated!
@mheermance
@mheermance 11 месяцев назад
This was a really interesting video. The notion that a lightweight W boson is possible, but rare, and is required for the interaction is just plain amazing.
@pystl
@pystl 11 месяцев назад
On the topic of is-it-a-force... The results of Pauli's exclusion principle sure looks like a force, as it counteracts the ability of half spin particles to be in the same state, i.e. to bunch up together. I would really appreciate a video explaining the distinction in that case. Thanks.
@denysvlasenko1865
@denysvlasenko1865 11 месяцев назад
Pauli exclusion is not pushing anything. E.g. due to it, a neutron inside neutron star can't decay, because there is "no available electron states" for resulting electron to exist in. But neutron feels no force.
@viliml2763
@viliml2763 11 месяцев назад
@@denysvlasenko1865 When you draw a free body diagram of a weight on a table, you have the gravitational force pushing downwards and the normal force pushing upwards. The normal force is caused by Pauli exclusion.
@sapelesteve
@sapelesteve 11 месяцев назад
Now that was a very strong elucidation of the weak force Dr. Don! Well done! 👍👍💥💥
@philiprice6961
@philiprice6961 11 месяцев назад
Imagine this guy as a lecturer! He would be Feynman-level awesome! Actually a full lecture series wouldn't be a bad idea, if you can ever spare the time!
@jonnygiantrobot
@jonnygiantrobot 11 месяцев назад
That would be great! Full lecture series please
@darrellee8194
@darrellee8194 11 месяцев назад
He's done at least one series for the Great Courses / Teaching Company / Wondrium
@mcnichollsdj
@mcnichollsdj 10 месяцев назад
First time I've learnt something concrete about the weak nuclear force, rather than that, "It's responsible for some forms of radioactivity..." fob-off I normally read. Great, and good to have the fob-off explicitly acknowledged!
@billwindsor4224
@billwindsor4224 11 месяцев назад
This man is completely awesome. And Femilab producing these instructional videos for the general public, solid information on physics that would take us years to learn, is also awesome. Thanks all!! 🏆🏆🏆
@martinpiekarski1512
@martinpiekarski1512 9 месяцев назад
Agreed. It is a hands-down the best scientific channel on RU-vid. Or at very least the best when it comes to physics.
@nickmhc
@nickmhc 8 месяцев назад
Top tier physics channel for sure
@grahamhagerty8648
@grahamhagerty8648 5 месяцев назад
Try Lecture series The Theory of Everything on Great Courses signature collection!
@Tletna
@Tletna 11 месяцев назад
Yes, I'd love to watch/listen to a deeper dive on the Weak Force, please! Thanks for the video.
@14loosecannon
@14loosecannon 11 месяцев назад
Interesting explanation of the weak force, especially describing the W bosons with the required energy as rare. From what I have been told before, the reason the weak force is considered weak is due to its lack of range, and that's due to the boson force carries having so much mass that their lifetimes are short as per the uncertainty principle. Are these two explanations equivalent?
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron 11 месяцев назад
yes, but the latter one is passé. see: Breit Wigner Distribution.
@marcochimio
@marcochimio Месяц назад
Fantastic Quick Video. This cleared up several questions I've had for years, but never bothered to deep-dive myself. Thank you.
@kuretinao8
@kuretinao8 11 месяцев назад
Don, thank you so much! I've been asking this question for such a long time and couldn't really get a straight answer! Now I have one! Great topic and, as always, great video!
@theliterarycritic939
@theliterarycritic939 11 месяцев назад
Thank you for this enlightening info ;)
@jardel_lucca
@jardel_lucca 11 месяцев назад
I can't emphasize enough how I love Dr. Don charismatic, very well didactic videos. I've been following for years
@kronkite1530
@kronkite1530 11 месяцев назад
Yes, more of these deeper dives please. This is excellent, so clear I could happily use it with my son.
@thomasdjonesn
@thomasdjonesn 11 месяцев назад
This was a far better way to learn about it than either simply reading about it or trying to make sense of static drawings. I certainly appreciate it, it helps me grasp the concept better.
@AirwavesEnglish
@AirwavesEnglish 11 месяцев назад
YES! Thanks a million, Don, I understood this on a whole new level now. I love this kind of "deep-dive" video; it's short, to the point and understandable. 🏆 PERFECT!
@polanve
@polanve 11 месяцев назад
Thanks for explaining this. Can you elaborate further on how elementary particles can change? Does this imply that maybe they are not elementary? Even just changing properties without changing to a whole different kind of particle seems to suggest some underlying structure.
@drdon5205
@drdon5205 11 месяцев назад
That is an open question in particle physics. Personally, I think your conjecture is likely to be true, however there is zero direct evidence supporting it. So, wait and see.
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron 11 месяцев назад
no structure, but underlying symmetry is required. Here it's called weak isospin (because it's weak, and has the same math as spin). The same way an electron can flip it's spin by exchanging a photon, a quark can flip its` flavor by exchanging a weak boson.
@moocowpong1
@moocowpong1 11 месяцев назад
@polanve ultimately it’s because in electroweak theory, an electron and a neutrino are two sides of the same coin; they’re both part of an “isospin doublet”, and likewise for two different quarks. But we see electroweak theory through the lens of broken symmetry. What seems like a fundamental change to the nature of the particle is like the particle rotating so that a different face of it is visible through that lens.
@drdca8263
@drdca8263 11 месяцев назад
So, you may have seen Feynman diagrams where there are vertices where there’s a wavy line representing a photon, and two straight lines representing an electron, meeting at a point, And depending on how these are arranged, this can represent any of: 1) an electron absorbing a photon, and then carrying on its way 2) an electron emitting a photon, and then carrying on its way 3) either of the 2 above things except replace “electron” with “positron” 4) a photon decaying into an electron and a positron 5) an electron and positron annihilating and producing a photon. This kind of interaction has 3 parts to it, an electron part, the flipped-around version of the electron part[1], and the photon part. Note that there’s the photon part, where the photon is the force carrying particle, a boson, and then there’s a pair of electron parts. To have an interaction that gives a change in identity, you would have it so that the 3 lines meeting at the point, are of three different kinds. One of the 3 kinds would be the W or Z boson, and the other two lines would be the two different flavors of particles that things are going between. (But the interaction has to be compatible with the symmetries, so there are some charges that need to be conserved by this interaction. So any kind of charge that the two flavors might differ in, has to be matched/carried by the charges of the boson. Err.. I said the interaction “has to be” compatible with the symmetries, but maybe I should just say “is compatible with the symmetries”.) [1]: “flipped around” in that either one is the input “electron goes into interaction” and one is output “electron comes out of interaction”, or one is electron and one is positron (i.e. anti-electron) the “flipped around” iirc corresponds to the Hermitian conjugate of some operator, which is pretty much like taking the complex-conjugate transpose of a matrix.
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
You should look into quantum field theory. Particles are waves or peaks of energy in a field (universe-spanning medium that holds and exchanges energy with fields it overlaps with, and has fundamental symmetries (rules of how it operates explainable by different kinds of math like points vectors tensors etc) Every electron acts like an electron because it is just a small part of the same "object". The weak force bosons involve the photon field, and the higgs field. Before a certain symmetry was broken (by not having enough energy to operate that way), the 3 other higgs particles overlapped with the 3 other photons and became the weak bosons. But back during the electroweak unification era there were 2 chargless higgs, 2 charged higgs, and 2 chargless photons 2 charged photons.
@LiborTinka
@LiborTinka 11 месяцев назад
I always asked myself "what the weak nuclear force actually do?" for years, never being curious enough to look it up. The popular books and shows always just mentioned the "it's responsible for nuclear decay etc.". And finally the answer came. Thanks!
@michaelwalsh6913
@michaelwalsh6913 2 месяца назад
I know I’m late to this video and to your channel, but wanted to confirm that deep dives like this are very welcome.
@me0101001000
@me0101001000 11 месяцев назад
What a classical explanation of a quantum phenomenon. I'm going to use that now, thanks! You think I could run with it and talk about the weak force as though I'm pulling things out of the bag and tossing it again with less contents? Or does that analogy break down?
@taichikitty
@taichikitty 11 месяцев назад
Could you please make a video explaining how the time dilation due to the difference in gravitation between the surface and the center of star affects the behavior and lifecycle of the star?
@stirlingblackwood
@stirlingblackwood 8 месяцев назад
Great video! I have so many questions!! 1) If every fundamental particle has a range of possible masses, does each particle have a specific, definite mass prior to observation? Or is its mass fundamentally probabilistic like the position of an electron prior to observation? And what does this have to do with the Higgs field/boson? (This topic might merit a whole other video). 2) What causes quarks to decay by emitting W bosons? And what is the order of decay? You mentioned that a top quark becomes a bottom quark which in turn becomes a charm quark. Can a charm quark then emit a W+ boson to become a strange quark, which can emit a W- boson to become an up quark, and then a final W+ to become a down quark? Can lower-mass particles ever absorb W bosons to become more massive particles, or does it only go one way? 3) What about Z bosons!? You barely mentioned them!
@caperider1160
@caperider1160 5 месяцев назад
No one explained weak force like you did. Thank you
@bluejames3698
@bluejames3698 11 месяцев назад
Can you explain why the weak force is “related” to the electromagnetic? Great vid as always! Keep up the good work guys!
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
You ahould look into electroweak unification era. Its on Wikipedia W+, w-, and z boson used to be split up into 3 extra higgs particles and 3 extra photons. When the symmetry broke they "fell into" eachother and became the weak bosons. What used to be 1 force with more particles became 2 forces with less particles
@aresh004
@aresh004 11 месяцев назад
​@@orbismworldbuilding8428 does this imply that the laws of physics were mutable at the time of the big bang and had to "harden" into the more stable laws we see now?
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
@@aresh004 the laws of physics just work like the laws of physics at that energy level. If we put enough energy into someparticles they would act like they used to before, during, and shortlely after the big bang. Its possible that when we lose enough energy, physics will change again and act differently at those energy levels. If the false vacuum theory is true, a false vacuum decay would be an event that results in a significant change in physics.
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
@@aresh004 not really Think of a phase transition from solid to liquid to gas, gas always acts like gas under those conditions (certain ranges of pressure and temperature) and physics is the same way, with laws and particle interactions changing depending on the phase of the universe.
@militantpacifist4087
@militantpacifist4087 11 месяцев назад
The funny thing about the strong force is that it becomes weak at high energy levels.
@drdon5205
@drdon5205 11 месяцев назад
And the weak force is stronger than the strong force at those energies.
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
Good to know
@thomas6502
@thomas6502 11 месяцев назад
Some laypersons contend that gratitude is also a force. If it succeeds in compelling, compelling content, all the more so. Thank you Fermilab (and all the other creators inspired by your contributions).
@tresajessygeorge210
@tresajessygeorge210 6 часов назад
THANK YOU... PROF. DR. LINCOLN...!!!
@stevelam1315
@stevelam1315 11 месяцев назад
How can a quark with a mass less than a proton emit a W+ boson with a mass 82 times greater than proton's mass?
@trainjumper
@trainjumper 11 месяцев назад
Because the mass of a W+ boson isn't always 80 GeV; there's a diminishingly small but non-zero probability of one being created with a significantly lower mass (~1 MeV or so for weak force interactions to occur)
@LuisAldamiz
@LuisAldamiz 11 месяцев назад
As far as I understand it's a question of two factors: (1) mass is nothing but energy, (2) quantum fluctuations (probability) which beat logic (unless you're strongly quantum-minded, I guess).
@drdon5205
@drdon5205 11 месяцев назад
What trainjumper said
@tonywells6990
@tonywells6990 11 месяцев назад
Virtual particles can have any mass. The W boson in interactions are virtual particles.
@stevelam1315
@stevelam1315 11 месяцев назад
@@tonywells6990 it means virtual particles are not physically real, its producing phantom energy?
@hanswoast7
@hanswoast7 11 месяцев назад
I would like to hear more details about how it works, about strength comparisons, particle energies for certain scenarios and stuff. As far as I understand it now, it should rather be called "rare force" than "weak force".
@IronAceSUB
@IronAceSUB 11 месяцев назад
Thanks Again for the Great Video Dr. Lincoln!!! I love getting to see the world the way you see it and hear all these parts of physics I may miss out on otherwise! Have a wonderful week sir! ✨
@SkorjOlafsen
@SkorjOlafsen 11 месяцев назад
Always great to see another video by Dr Don!
@AnimeForeLife
@AnimeForeLife 11 месяцев назад
I miss your mustache
@MurseSamson
@MurseSamson 11 месяцев назад
It was only held together by weak forces, and I'm sure it will recur from its own natural processes, given enough time. ⚛️😂
@killer414
@killer414 11 месяцев назад
The moustache had it's own gravitational field that hindered his other force fields
@bluejames3698
@bluejames3698 11 месяцев назад
Same
@jardel_lucca
@jardel_lucca 11 месяцев назад
​@@MurseSamsonLMAO
@EscapingHome
@EscapingHome 11 месяцев назад
😂
@b4d0n10n
@b4d0n10n 11 месяцев назад
Yes please on the deeper dives! The way you explain things is very intuitive (and comical at times) 😊
@_rojer9065
@_rojer9065 10 месяцев назад
The heavy sack and boat analogy made so much sense on recoil 🙌🏼
@massimiliano-oronzo
@massimiliano-oronzo 11 месяцев назад
Prof. Lincoln, an off-topic argument: in a next video can you explain the problem of the self-energy of the electron and its solution by introducing what is known as mass renormalization?
@terrywallace5181
@terrywallace5181 11 месяцев назад
Thank you. I needed this explanation.
@DavidBeddard
@DavidBeddard 11 месяцев назад
Exeedingly interesting, Dr Lincoln! Thank you!
@louismcsomas
@louismcsomas 11 месяцев назад
Your videos are always amazing. Great content, thank you
@jonathanbyrdmusic
@jonathanbyrdmusic 11 месяцев назад
. Loved this deeper dive. Thank you.
@luislerrub
@luislerrub 11 месяцев назад
Very nice explanation and Video. Thank you!
@jeremyrixon150
@jeremyrixon150 11 месяцев назад
Thank you! I've been wondering about this for years!
@barefootalien
@barefootalien 11 месяцев назад
I'd definitely love a longer, more in-depth video about the Weak Force. I wish your videos were much longer in general! I'd also love an explanation of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and how exactly it works, in terms of forces. I've heard so many conflicting explanations, each one stated with more gusto and certainty than the last, about something as simple as "why don't I fall through my chair?" and how that relates to "Why don't white dwarves collapse?" Obviously the latter is from electron degeneracy pressure, which is related to the Pauli Exclusion Principle, yet nobody ever describes _how_ that happens. Sure, okay, no two fermions can occupy the exact same quantum state, but when they try, something _stops_ them. This is presumably a force of some kind, because F=ma. Without that force, the particles would continue to move closer to each other. The fact that they don't, means there's a force... right? But what force is it? Similarly, I've heard descriptions of solid-solid object interactions as being governed by the electromagnetic force, but I've also seen very convincing claims, backed up by mathematical analysis, that says that would be far, far too weak, and that the real reason I don't fall through my chair is the Pauli Exclusion Principle, but... that seems very unlikely, and nobody has yet been able to explain to my satisfaction _how_ that happens. So I'd love a video that can answer this question. When two particles get near each other, enough that their wave functions begin to overlap and they become at-risk of sharing the same quantum state, *something happens* to prevent that. What is that something? So far whenever I ask that question, all I get is "The Pauli exclusion principle prevents it." But that's just a name for some words describing a concept. Without more concept beneath that to be revealed, it can't prevent _anything,_ you know? There's nothing in there that feels satisfying in the same way that electromagnetism, gravity, or even the strong or weak forces does.
@UDumFck
@UDumFck 10 месяцев назад
Excellent comment. I’ve wondered the same about white dwarves.
@gustav3d
@gustav3d 11 месяцев назад
You are extremely talented at explaining complex stuff . Thanks !
@denysvlasenko1865
@denysvlasenko1865 11 месяцев назад
I think a video would be helpful which would show simplified Standard Model's Lagrangian and explain how you can "read off", without any calculations, what its terms actually mean: how you can see which particles can interact, what determines the strength of interactions, what terms are not allowed by postulated symmetries of the theory, and what this means. A LOT of people watching these videos never actually dab into math of the theory. Some seem to even coming to the conclusion that "science" is just some sciency-sounding words strung together and lots of handwaving (and they mimic this with hilarious results). They genuinely do not understand that there is actual rigorous mathematical "meat" beneath it, the handwaving is actually not allowed as a part of the theory. Everything has to logically come out of the math. IOW: they have rather erroneous understanding how science works. This is worth improving.
@pierredergroe7547
@pierredergroe7547 11 месяцев назад
Dr. Don is a force, too. THE force. May he be with us!
@DRoss-zt1io
@DRoss-zt1io 11 месяцев назад
Please keep the deep dives coming, and sharpen more corners!
@Sighhhh
@Sighhhh 11 месяцев назад
I've been trying to fully understand the weak force for years! Thanks for the vid.
@darrellee8194
@darrellee8194 11 месяцев назад
Finally and explanation that makes sense. Thanks.
@markhuebner7580
@markhuebner7580 11 месяцев назад
Thanks! Very enlightening information about the Weak force!
@catoleg
@catoleg 11 месяцев назад
Thank you for this explanation, I learned something new today
@Tubluer
@Tubluer 10 месяцев назад
Thanks for the vid, Don! The information density was very high on this one. I am pleased, and so is my cat. :)
@viliml2763
@viliml2763 11 месяцев назад
Is degeneracy pressure a force? It's the most common "force" we feel in everyday life - the "force" that pushes back on us when we push something and the "force" that keeps us from sinking into the floor.
@datapro007
@datapro007 11 месяцев назад
Cool topic Don, thanks.
@mahyar305
@mahyar305 11 месяцев назад
Excellent work an thanks, please do the "deep dive" into this topic
@NalitaQubit
@NalitaQubit 7 месяцев назад
Love your episodes!
@Alex-iwe8ke9dds
@Alex-iwe8ke9dds 11 месяцев назад
A great, short explanation about something that should had been learned when we learned about this force.
@adoggy1111
@adoggy1111 10 месяцев назад
Can't say enough good things about Don. Keep it up champ
@lucidmoses
@lucidmoses 11 месяцев назад
Nicely done.
@TerryClarkAccordioncrazy
@TerryClarkAccordioncrazy 11 месяцев назад
This answers a question that bugged me for a long time. Thanks, and please more deep dives.
@larrywebber2971
@larrywebber2971 11 месяцев назад
I agree with many that the deeper dives are very interesting and I personally would like to see more of them.
@LowellBoggs
@LowellBoggs 11 месяцев назад
Man I love you videos. Thanks!
@classicaudioadventures
@classicaudioadventures 11 месяцев назад
I'd love to see more deep dives, Dr. Lincoln!
@eritronc
@eritronc 11 месяцев назад
Please another video about weak force, very insteresting. Thank you Dr. Don!!!
@michalchik
@michalchik 11 месяцев назад
Thank you. It might have been my question you were answering. I appreciate the Fuller deeper explanation. I see this RU-vid channel as the place to go when I listen to other educational channels and I'm left with questions because of their abbreviated or over simplified explanations of physics. I first really noticed that when you addressed the twin paradox without having to arbitrarily invoke acceleration. Would you consider doing a deep dive into the concepts are around Machs principle and the weird fact that acceleration is not relative? My guess is that it has something to do with the absolute geometry of space-time and the nature of causality, but I don't know.
@QuantumCrafts
@QuantumCrafts 11 месяцев назад
Very interesting, thank you!
@mrdsn189
@mrdsn189 11 месяцев назад
Thank you, this helped a lot!
@jaimeduran9423
@jaimeduran9423 11 месяцев назад
I enjoyed your explanation of a force with two boats and also between two particles. This is the case of a repulsion force. I would like to see a similar explanation for an atractive force. Thank you.
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron 11 месяцев назад
the ball has negative momentum
@jaimeduran9423
@jaimeduran9423 11 месяцев назад
@@DrDeuteron That is a non-intuitive mathematical explanation, not very understandable.
@thedeemon
@thedeemon 11 месяцев назад
one can imagine people on a big rug pulling the rug from each other. These are no more than vague illustrations/metaphors, don't expect them to correspond precisely to quantum processes.
@DrDeuteron
@DrDeuteron 11 месяцев назад
@@jaimeduran9423 well virtual particles have the energy and momentum required to conserve energy and momentum between the two real particles, after the fact. So in a bound circular orbit, that would be energy = 0, momentum < 0, mass--> imaginary. plus: the exchange is not time ordered...it's not like one emits and the other absorbs. There is no intuitive value to the analogy.
@comesignotus9888
@comesignotus9888 11 месяцев назад
Definitely need a deeper dive with explanations of how neutrinos interact using the weak force.
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
So you know how quarks interact with it? Think of that, but keep in mind that a neutrino is a "down lepton" while an electron is an "up lepton".
@denysvlasenko1865
@denysvlasenko1865 11 месяцев назад
@@orbismworldbuilding8428 > a neutrino is a "down lepton" while an electron is an "up lepton". The opposite. e- needs to emit W- to become a neutrino. d needs to emit W- to become an u. Thus, electron is a "down"-type particle, and neutrino is "up"
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
@@denysvlasenko1865 oh cool! I didn't know that Very good to know
@orbismworldbuilding8428
@orbismworldbuilding8428 11 месяцев назад
@@denysvlasenko1865 thank you!
@Dai5tr0y3r
@Dai5tr0y3r 11 месяцев назад
I would love a deeper dive series!
@actsnfacts
@actsnfacts 11 месяцев назад
The hardest to understand of the forces, in an easy to understand video!
@Paco-nq5yz
@Paco-nq5yz 11 месяцев назад
Toujours aussi intéressant MERCI
@lsdap1969
@lsdap1969 11 месяцев назад
Dear Don, I'm an avid fan of the videos you release on a regular basis and grateful for the hard work you put into making particle physics more accesible to the audience. I was wondering if there would be on option of making a video regarding weak hypercharge and weak isospin with the perspective of how and why (to our best understanding) matter gains charge as this has been buggin me for a while now. I understand that currently our understanding and explanation is that there needs to be a conserved quantity for every symmetry (thank you Emmy) however you of all people should be aware how new perspective of various attempts of explaining the same phenomenon could lead to new insights for some people
@jerryhammond373
@jerryhammond373 11 месяцев назад
Great video.
@mikewiest5135
@mikewiest5135 11 месяцев назад
Thank you!
@jamesmccoy8568
@jamesmccoy8568 11 месяцев назад
Best explanation of this ever
@kantanlabs3859
@kantanlabs3859 11 месяцев назад
Nice one !
@rikarch
@rikarch Месяц назад
I think it is interesting that you talk about the weak force and mention quarks and Zs and Ws, but not a mention about the beta particle (electron) or the neutrino (and their anti parts) which are actually produced in the decay.
@elaadt
@elaadt 11 месяцев назад
Wow! I had no idea. After all the physics I've learned and explanations I've heard, this was new to me.
@soundcheck6885
@soundcheck6885 10 месяцев назад
That is an excellent explanation under 10 minutes.
@andregomesdasilva
@andregomesdasilva 11 месяцев назад
Great video
@ArchDudeify
@ArchDudeify 11 месяцев назад
Excellent deeper dive Excellent t-shirt 😎
@derPatte26
@derPatte26 11 месяцев назад
Absolutely I want to hear more. 🤩 Another channel in Germany calls it always: 'Eine Tiefbohrung setzen' and I love it. 😊
@rinaazmomin1234
@rinaazmomin1234 10 месяцев назад
I have watched this channel at 11 years old and this is amazing❤❤🎉
@user-xn4wq4sv3r
@user-xn4wq4sv3r 11 месяцев назад
Thank you for the excellent video. Actually, you have defined the general concept of a force, which means to change a state of an object - a particle's position, its identity, its quantum state, etc. A physicist comes to this general concept of a force when he or she steps into the philosophy of physics.
@bigsarge2085
@bigsarge2085 11 месяцев назад
Fascinating.
@TheyCallMeNewb
@TheyCallMeNewb 11 месяцев назад
Awe at those opening and closing cards!!
@senseofeverthing
@senseofeverthing 11 месяцев назад
I'm interested in quantum- and astrophysics since I was a child, but I never heared of the mass-distribution until now. You, Sir, blew my mind today.
@DonBrowningRacing
@DonBrowningRacing 11 месяцев назад
Yes! I want to hear more! How what when where and why did we learn about this weak force?
@LeChat084
@LeChat084 11 месяцев назад
Thanks!
@youtube.scientist
@youtube.scientist 8 месяцев назад
Probably the most accurate physics channel on RU-vid. It could be that the neutral weak Z current is similar to the photon because they are paired before the electroweak phase transition, before the Higgs mechanism provides the longitudinal degree of freedom and mass to the Z boson. W bosons are also paired and charged and have a different effect. Also its probably called weak force because is 40 times weaker then strong nuclear force.
@maxeuker2949
@maxeuker2949 11 месяцев назад
I feel like I'm pretty informed for someone not in the field. I knew none of this. Thank you so much for the insights, very cool!
Далее
Deep dive into the known forces
11:22
Просмотров 293 тыс.
How far is the edge of the universe?
16:28
Просмотров 2,1 млн
Quantum Entanglement: Spooky Action at a Distance
14:42
Do photons experience time?
6:34
Просмотров 473 тыс.
Why is the Weak Force weak?
10:33
Просмотров 785 тыс.
Everything you need to know about Fermilab
14:17
Просмотров 194 тыс.
What Does The Strong Nuclear Force Look Like?
11:05
Просмотров 282 тыс.
How Einstein saved magnet theory
10:00
Просмотров 212 тыс.
What Makes The Strong Force Strong?
21:37
Просмотров 1 млн
📱 SAMSUNG, ЧТО С ЛИЦОМ? 🤡
0:46
Просмотров 1,7 млн