It kinda seems like you can just crop the photo in post to get more megapixels out of it, rather than using the in camera crop mode. It looks liek the crop mode chops off way more than it should.
Rf lenses are little bit pricy but awesome. Compared to G master II they are almost same. I hv the trinity of RF lenses 15-35 f2.8 28-70 f2.0 70-200 f/4 And thats amazing❤
This is a biased review. He never talked about the 24mm starting point and wide images rather than 28mm 24mm is SO much wider and in landscape you need higher Aperture. So giving 24-240mm range would make the lens heavy as those just 4mm makes a HUGE difference IRL.
I realize this is 2 years old, but it is still very relevant. The RP is still offered with and without the RF 24-105mm f4-f7.1. I was hesitating but at only $250 US more roughly for the model with the lens, it seems like a no brainer after having watched this video. Thank you very much! By the way, your English is very good and quite clear.
Viltrox also works fast and sharply on my antiqued A7ii. Glad that I found one in a second hand shop selling at about USD188, the cheapest among those with large apertures, and with nice small body. Never heard about it so it did not harm to try it. Immediately attracted by its sharpness, even better to me than the Sony 85mm f1.8 I was originally trying. So bought it as a duo to the Sony and the seller was happy to give further discount! Then I knew it was from China, glad that I am lucky to pick a good one.
I use the Lumix S5ii which I believe has the exact same sensor. It suffers from the same issue. Earlier I had owner R6 II. There I never noticed these hot pixels at all.
My EOS RP came with the 24-105 kit lens. I bought the camera a few weeks after launch. At that time the kit lens was the RF24-105 f4L. The STM lens did not exist at that time.
Its funny that everyone says that Sony has more 3rd party lens choice but most people don't own more than 3 lenses. Plus EF lenses on a Canon work as good or better than 3rd party lenses on a Sony and there are just as many EF lenses as 3rd party Sony lenses. FACTS!
Viktrox is more than double the price her in EU than the Sony :) In the centre the have +- same sharpness. My current combo is 20-70 g f4 (which is superb lens in AF and shrapness) and sony 50 1.8 and im quite happy with this :)
Very nice job overall, and for the review and for your food photos! I think in close to average distances 100pro is totally fine/great, but the main point of buying 200pro vs 100pro is when you want to light lets say a big place from way behind like a venue/children theater and you will have to use 100pro at 1/2 and full power all the time. You can easily need 2 or 3 batteries for 100pro and also come across overheating issues (lets also not forget that batteries life decline as you use them and the full power shots wont be 360 for ever). With 200pro you will have to worry much much less about these things.
Thanks for your video, it’s so helpful. 👍 But, please, do something with color correction of your videos. This is sony’s color, yellow-green skin tone .
Bokeh is NOT depth of field!! Further more, if you frame your subject the same with both lenses, i.e. get closer with the 35mm, you'll get the same depth of field. What you are showing is the subject-background separation.
Canon's expertise in color renderings and reproduction is superb in terms of portraiture photography but its lens lineup is over-priced and not entry-friendly with many of its buget-friendly lenses being chronically out-of-stock. Sony has a series problem with color management despit its superb image sensors; it's lagging behind Canon in terms of color renderings.
Thank you, but I didn't see a lot of difference in usage between the two ? Abd the light quality between the two lenses ? I would think that with a bigger softbox the most powerful ad200 would be good ?
One question though, I observed, you shoot at very high ISO of around 1000, that has affected the image clarity and quality. Just my perspective, maybe it is something of your own liking. Thanks for the info
I think my initial balance was done wrongly. When I turn on my gimble the camera is listing on an right angle. Is there a way to reset this so my camera is in a balanced position? I thank anyone who can help me with this.
First of all I really enjoyed your review but there's something you should know: f/stop on apsc has no EQUIVALENT on full frame. 1.4 is 1.4 no matter the system. F/stop measures the amount of light. Keep up the good work 👍🏻
You're correct about the F Stops in light gathering, F1.4 is F1.4 regardless of APSC vs Full Frame. The crop sensor does change the FOV and compression/bokeh though. He's saying the f0.95 will create bokeh similar to a FF F1.4, like how a 35mm will give the same FOV of 52mm.
