XPENG’s vision of the future is one where mobility is more intelligent, intuitive and accessible to all. Not limited to road, sky or sea. Explore the distance with us.
@@fsbbs The commitmens they have, the scope of vehcile which will be considered for the Xpeng architecture is rising. Xpeng has significant progress very recently and freuqently.... VW will benefit from it as well.
Finally yes, BMW did not realized since February 1994, what Xpeng did in the last few months... BMW Group was not helped, not respected, but they continue doing EJFJ proposed technologies like the wheel included motor with breaking abilities, with their new partner since 2019... The Volkswagen Gate put a break in everything, now we are with Xpeng Motors and other few good brands (Yangwang, Nio, Bentley, ...).
@@fsbbsNo, Xpeng Motors is the best brand, Volkswagen was the biggest many years ago and has been overpassed for quality and durability by Lexus and Toyota, who have been overpassed by Xpeng Motors now! Xpeng Motors, Xpeng Robotics and Xpeng AeroHT are leaders, others follow... Volkswagen is used to follow, Audi is the worse brand because of this, because they sell luxuous products which are not invented by them but tested and realized by Volkswagen and Porsche and Skoda!
Xpeng Motors does this, Tesla is again pretending wrong things about them competing to achieving this, but they do not have any abilities except those robbed to EJFJ Corporation PSC since November 1993...
We do not see well, the G9 illustration is much better, here we see the whole front only when fully lighted, but the lights are adaptative as we see during the few first seconds...
There are several inaccurate statements in this video. Waymos are not navigating around pigeons. Waymos are not being taken over by remote human drivers as the video claims at 4:40. It's good to be talkative and share information. I like that part of the video. The translated English is good and clear, but there several inaccurate statements in this video. When Waymos say, "Our team is working to get you moving", it does not mean that the on-broad driving system is overridden by a remote human driver as this video implies. That is neither legal in CA nor practical. Instead, this statement by Waymo is an acknowledgement that the car's progress toward a destination has been slowed or stopped and that a remote human Waymo team has been notified, such that this team can monitor the situation, communicate with passengers, and, if necessary, send an Waymo specialist to manually drive the car. Waymos are never being driven remotely, even temporarily.
Old car, much better than the Xiaomi SU7 and all others models, but far worse than the future Xpeng P7+ and not as good as the cheap but very very effective Xpeng Mona M03! The P7i is a good BMW, SAAB, Lexus (even more durable then how they were in 2019 before having to reduce quality because of financial constraints requested by the COVID-19), or a Tesla (fully electric too and quite as efficient with 400V too (only in this one, all others are 800V electric vehicles !)
@@petitbarzun In Germany, they just arrived but during tests it seams it works already much better than opponent systems. In the Netherlands, it should be the case, especially if you receive your vehicle soonly...
@@EJFJ-Corporation It has very good Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Centering Control and Adaptive Lane Change. In China, the G6 can also do this based on navigation. You tell it where to go and it will choose an appropriate lane for its speed and take an exit on the highway, without user interaction. As shown in the video, it can also do that in cities in China, but I guess that will take longer to bring to Europe.
@@petitbarzun and I agree to that too. Comparatively Europe is very complex. Imagine London roads… it’s a nightmare. But in order of difficulty, I’d say US is more complex than China given that road strictness is not as high as China. In China road strictness is so high that it is relatively easier having the autopilot stick to policies implemented in its rules engine. For instance no overtaking on continuous line, or no overtaking at school areas, traffic lights count down aided by 3rd party integration and so many more road aides in China. You don’t get that in US.
@@eaojnr Do not mistake mess and complexity! In USA there are everything, even poor persons who want to stop suffering by making others suffering as much as they can... In Asia, they are far more respectuous of human lives, and do not do anything nefast. But as there are far more road users each hour in one place, and as many are thinking of problems they life outside of their car when they are staying in their car, they can make mistakes or take inconsiderated risks! So, this is complexity, to manage very different users having different needs ... In Europa, there are lot of different situations, each round about is specific, each country and each city have specific way to treat things, specific rules that only the local drivers know ... There are far too many informations, not all can be seen by driving... Europa exploits risks management and néfaste disparities to make money turn from one citizen to others...
@@EJFJ-Corporation Mess is part of the complexity to manage through perceptive receptors of autonomous robots. Complexity is a myraid of concerns, including marked and unmarked road interests. If roads were clean, with very good lane markings, well spaced, with strict road use enforcement, you can have a more managed capability to handle perception and planning. In the absence of that, you have to manage a more complex scenario. This is the reason it is completely misleading to say China roads are more complex than US. I've lived in both places, and it's almost a naive statement. In China, Xpeng as an example sources high-definition maps, and roads are very well demarcated most of the time. In the absence of well-demarcated roads, there are good kerbs and good trafic monitoring systems in place to check bad road use, and on top of all that, training schools for drivers ensure that drivers adhere strictly to road regulations and stipulations. You can't get that in the US. You have road rage, uncontrolled walk across streets, some narrow roads and so much more mess to have to handle. Now Tesla doesn't use LiDAR, but only relies on pure camera, and yet, it does much better based on its perception pipeline. If you take a Tesla FSD and put it on a Chinese Road it will excel almost instantly given the more orderly state of roads in China. If you put Xpeng latest XOS in US it will fail because it doesn't have high-definition maps. The only way you will be able to use it favorable ok, will be with the "AI-Driver" feature, which is a clever workaround to not having high-definition maps. AI-driver is another integration that leverages waypoints (Refer to DJI Drone Waypoints) to do precision recording of the path, and then you can save it and play it over and over again. Am i chatting with a XPENGs bot - go figure. lol!
When the orange car was stopped on your lane the system should have stop and waited for the opposite car to pass first because they have the right if way then it should have proceeded after instead of cutting the double yellow lane in my opinion.
In a round about, when the speed is not important, the car should stay on the outside lane. Only if speed is important, it can move closer to the center, and get out of the few seconds before having to exit, without cutting the other vehicles trajectory, but by joining their lane and freeing it to join the outside lane to take the next exit ramp... This needs to be improved, and the Xpeng Motors vehicles fmshozls he able to manage them up to 214km/h, by limitating the speed accurately to spare any tyre damage and any waste of energy... The X9 can turn quickly on the most center lane, but accordingly to the conditions, and respecting all human drivers who are not very efficient, and who are badly creative, doing some incorrect things... Xpeng Motors vehicles do not have any right doing anything imperfect! In Europa, certain round about are out at the entry of highway, and the speed it limited at 50km/h ou 70km/h, but some stranged situations like urgency vehicles which are late being at the right place, when something incorrect or wasteful already happened (after is too late : on the road only prevention needs to be applied and warrantied). Let's do much better all together! EJFJ Corporation PSC is there for you, even if blocked and badly parodied! The round about or U turn need to be positively contextualized in advance, detecting the vehicles and users in presence and calculate how things need to be done in 2 or 5 secondes maximum and Xpeng Motors vehicles should communicate positively with WiFi waves to indicate what can be done or should be done by any vehicle, giving priority to the small fragile vehicles or pedestrians, then quick vehicles, then again the small fragile vehicles who freed a bit space to let quicker vehicles passing, and then the large abd heavy vehicles need to pass and free place for all others vehicles! The priority is a fundamental one, it should not he requested, but in contrary warrantied according to what is scientifically possible, by taking in account all very specific human beings and tools involved in this very specific, unique and unreproducible, situation! Thouthands or billions of similar situations will then happen, but always a little bit differently ... Different tyres, different metro, different vehicles, different Hunan beings (at least older ones, if exactly the same!).
@@TariqZahid-d1l No, the steering wheel is useful to put hands on, it is not nefast in anything, he does not drive, he follows... But if the driver or the front passenger fully blocks the driving wheel, the car should drove normally, conveniently, sparing any accident. And even the driver turns the driving wheel totally incorrectly, the vehicle needs to follow an existing road and protecting all users. The vocal system should ask the car inoccupants what they want to do, take a rest on a secure border side, move quickly to a hospital, and help enjoyment of all users...
@@TariqZahid-d1l Others alternative are arriving, and from Xpeng, not from other brands... We will see if Nio adopts XNGP too and collaborates improving it too, as they did a quote correct one, but much less complete and less efficient than the very fantastic XNGP ..
@@eaojnr This needs to be solved! Thank you for requesting this whenever you can to Xpeng staff or technical support ... I hope they use Tianjin OS on their system and that they do not have to repeat to engineers what they read, and that AI concretely help them improving things and show their habilités rather than having to write a lot and search for little errors! 😉
Relatively new owner of a G9 in Guangzhou. With many questions/comments: - car signals a change lane with little or no time in advance. Takes you by surprise and by the time it signals it's already doing it making it difficult to check if it is appropriate or not (since you are supposed to be vigilant at all times) - Tends to drive towards the right of the lane, not in the center, even if there are cars towards the left side of the lane next to you. - Hesitates a bit when surpassing a big vehicle. Sometimes I need to intervene by accelerating to make it finish the operation. (although in my last experience it felt much better, not sure if already addressed) - I would like to learn more about how the AI works. What helps more? (as training) Using the autopilot or driving manually and then making the car learn the route (using the valet function) Guys, no complains. Very satisfied. Just would like to contribute more to make the system even better. 🎉
@@yome1562 Very good that you take things positively as you do... Things are getting better and better, now you are a scientist who try a fantastic tool, which is not very dangerous, but which is new and trying to do automatically what Hunan beings create seldomly and randomly... Road are not humano-normed as they should be, with few lanthanid atoms illustrating the type of road, the direction to reach the next hypo-magnetic microship allowing the vehicle to understand if the road is in a good state or damaged by even an earthquake!
@@eaojnr Complain as Elon Musk would do, improvements made now will allow new users to try Xpeng, Xpeng Mona, and Nio and others future Xpeng partners, allowing to quickly make them be not only better than Tesla, but the only totally secure and effective ADAS 5.0 in China and then elsewhere in the world! In Germany it seams to work very well, according to videos I saw... In China it works well in some places, but it need to be globalized by understanding which specific manner is the best in any sort of specific case! We are all scientists, trying to make things respecting alive beings most fundamental needs: security, freedom, enjoyment, doing healthy activities and realizing useful things to make life better... Animals do this, robots have to do it too and try to, because they have this legal obligation, but unfortunately human beings do not have this obligation to respect even their own most fundamental needs! At least, they are not helped to benefitting of them!
Very good presentation, and not like Tesla which works very correctly only on some specific roads or in some conditions. Xpeng is applying global solutions made for the global world, with lot of different situations which should be respected and used correctly, as local specificities but which can be transposed positively in other similar conditions or when this method is convenient in a strange situation, to respect road users habits and surprise them conveniently (without taking any risk)... It needs to respect all users, and not only the bad driver's habits and surprise him positively as a professional taxi driver will do! But it allows to respect the wishes of all road drivers, soaring risks, and making all not taking any bad habits d'y doing things as an Amator driver and not as a conscious and efficient driver, who spares both tyres damages and energy wastings! Things needs to be considered both globally but accurately in this very specific and unique situation!
@@kimdr.5231 Yes, exactly what I said, but it is now adapted in different countries, to respect their local wasteful and illicit rules to drive not very efficiently... They put lot of different expensive but inefficient speed limitations systems, that increase néfaste disparities between those who have strong and efficient vehicles abd those who have old ones or sportive ones ... Xpeng Motors does very efficient vehicles which can adapt fully to the conditions, but they need to learn how things work locally... They now use good ways to improve, by storing what human beings propose, as it should be globally done by EJFJ Positive Contextualisation since March 15th, 1996!
@@kimdr.5231 Yes, thank you, my sentence was not clear, I corrected it... Tesla is not made globally, it is tried in California and sold in the global world, but with only legal adaptations, but not the most secured ones like not letting anything touch the car!
Nope, you're misleading folks. Tesla is using pure vision, so it learns on-the-go and adapts. It doesn't rely on high-definition maps, and that's the reason FSR works correctly in any road circumstance with little helper data, like high-definition maps, or additional telemetry data.
With high definition maps from a 3rd party, why not. I get worried when the hider maps is not up to date with actual road conditions. In those situations what happens is the car then drops to LCC
Xpeng still do not get it.. A Sedan is useless for normal people, a sedan have to be a hatchback. with a prober trunk opening. also its very importent for a sedan to have a towbar for trailer or camping.. otherwice the Xpeng cars will never survieve in europa.
