In PvT, people call Terran the "Time bomb" because once Terran reaches max supply, it is almost auto win against protoss unless 'toss has a silly high base count. But if Toss goes carrier, the time bomb dynamic flips. If toss gets enough carriers, there is not a lot a Terran can do to stop them. Nal_Ra had that critical mass of carriers and Boxer being able to use such an unconventional unit to stop them was a massive deal.
"because once Terran reaches max supply, it is almost auto win against protoss." Umm... Just no IN MY OPINION. Terran units are weaker and require micromanaging in order to maximize their full potential. You can't just send siege tanks and a group of m/m to the enemies base. You have to siege, hold the marines + stim for them to be effective. The same goes with a lot of other Terran units. Toss in the other hand have more hit points this they can just be sent to auto attack in any direction. The Terran race requires a more skilled player to maximize their units and more strategy than the other 2 races who just mass attack...
@@Hmongboi228 Marines aren't really used much in Terran vs Protoss. Although marines are used for early defense and a few medic-marine cheeses, for the most part for terran it is Tanks + Vultures. The big reason why marines aren't used is because reavers hard counter them big time.
sehr schön neutral gehalten.....nicht Finde es äußerst nervig, dass bei den weniger seriösen Berichten über games immer nur die Klarnamen der Spieler benutzt werden, besonders bei Koreanern. Die sollten wenigstens den IG dazuschreiben, aber Leute mit dem technischen knowhow von frontal21 wissen noch nichtmal was das ist.
