The biggest mistake of World war 1 and 2 was the historical figures of infamy that failed to comprehend the intricacies of money creation. If governments did not Acquiesce to the borrowing and lending system perpetuated by banking institutions the trajectory of history would have taken a dramatically different course. These financial systems, characterized by the issuance of debt, resulting in inflation, devaluation ect, leads to marginalization and disenfranchisement, and has historically led to catastrophic economic and social consequences. Had these figures discerned that the true locus of power lay not within the innocent civilian populace but within the institutions that created and upheld the financial system, they might have redirected their ire and efforts. The banking institutions, which propagated the myth of pervasive indebtedness, operated under a framework that coerced governments and nations into a cycle of debt and dependency. This systemic construct engendered massive debt deficits, precipitated inflation, and devalued currencies, which in turn sowed seeds of discord and division among the masses. Instead of succumbing to the superficial and destructive path of warfare against marginalized and innocent groups, an enlightened understanding of the financial machinations could have prompted these leaders to challenge the very bedrock of the economic system. By targeting the creators and holders of treasury bonds, the money printers, and the legal frameworks binding nations to this debt, they could have waged a battle against the institutions perpetuating economic and social turmoil. This shift in focus from civilian populations to the financial and governmental institutions might have averted the massive loss of life and the internecine conflicts that characterized these wars. A concerted effort to dismantle or reform the banking systems could have potentially mitigated the economic pressures that led to widespread suffering and discontent. The notion that these leaders, had they possessed this financial acumen, would have directed their efforts towards systemic change rather than destructive conflict, underscores the importance of understanding the root causes of societal issues. By addressing the underlying economic structures, rather than engaging in surface-level warfare, they could have pursued a more just and equitable resolution to the crises of their times. This alternative path, focused on dismantling the institutions that perpetuated financial dependency and inequality, offers a compelling hypothetical scenario of how history might have been different had the true sources of power and oppression been identified and challenged. The following is the historical context that proves that these historical figures of infamy including their supporters turned on the Jews instead of the institutions perpetuating debt deficits that created inflation devaluation resulting in marginalisation and the disenfranchisement of German people. The institutionalized racism against Jewish people in Nazi Germany, which played a significant role in the lead-up to World War II, was rooted in complex socio-economic factors exacerbated by historical prejudices and political opportunism. The marginalisation and disenfranchisement contributed to this tragic sequence of events. In the aftermath of World War I, Germany faced economic turmoil exacerbated by punitive reparations, hyperinflation, and widespread unemployment. During this period, some Jewish individuals, like others, managed to achieve economic success through entrepreneurship, professional positions, or financial investments. However, their relative success became a focal point for resentment among segments of the population facing economic hardship. This resentment was fueled by propaganda that scapegoated Jewish people as beneficiaries of a system that disadvantaged others. Political opportunists, such as Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, exploited this economic discontent to advance their agenda. They propagated the myth of Jewish financial control and painted Jews as an internal enemy responsible for Germany's economic and social woes. By framing Jews as the "other," separate from the German nation and as conspirators against it, they fueled xenophobia and directed popular anger and frustration towards a vulnerable minority. As the Nazis rose to power, they institutionalized anti-Semitic policies through legal frameworks that systematically marginalized and disenfranchised Jewish people. This included stripping them of citizenship, prohibiting their employment in certain professions, seizing their businesses and properties, and ultimately confining them to ghettos and concentration camps. These policies not only legalized discrimination but also normalized and perpetuated hatred and violence against Jewish individuals and communities. Nazi propaganda portrayed Jews as racially inferior and morally corrupt, reinforcing stereotypes and justifying their exclusion from society. This dehumanization paved the way for increasingly severe measures, culminating in the Holocaust, where millions of Jews and other minorities were systematically murdered in the name of racial purity. Marginalisation and disenfranchisement, exacerbated by economic hardship and political manipulation, created fertile ground for institutionalized racism against Jewish people in Germany. This systematic marginalization fueled xenophobia and provided a convenient scapegoat for broader societal issues, ultimately contributing to the catastrophic events of World War II. Understanding these historical dynamics underscores the dangers of prejudice, propaganda, and the manipulation of economic grievances for political ends, highlighting the importance of vigilance against racism and intolerance in all its forms. Hitler and the Nazi Party's scapegoating of Jewish people was a tragic misdirection of blame away from the true economic and financial institutions that perpetuated Germany's economic woes. Here’s a deeper exploration of how a misinformed focus on Jews, rather than systemic issues, shaped their approach. Misguided Blame: Hitler and the Nazis erroneously blamed Jewish individuals for Germany's economic struggles, portraying them as conspirators and profiteers who undermined the nation's economic well-being. This scapegoating was based on anti-Semitic stereotypes and prejudices rather than a factual understanding of economic systems and monetary policy. Failure to Address Root Causes: By focusing on persecuting Jewish people instead of addressing the systemic economic challenges, Hitler missed an opportunity to challenge the institutions that controlled monetary policy, debt creation, and economic stability. This failure to tackle the root causes perpetuated economic instability and exacerbated social divisions. Political Exploitation: Hitler and the Nazis exploited public discontent and economic hardship for political gain, using anti-Semitic rhetoric to consolidate power and deflect attention from their own policy failures. This strategy of blaming minorities for societal problems is a tactic used throughout history by authoritarian regimes to distract from systemic issues. The tragedy of World War II serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of misinformation, scapegoating, and the consequences of failing to address systemic issues. Understanding the complexities of economic policy and its impact on society is crucial in preventing similar tragedies and promoting informed governance. In hindsight, if Hitler and the Nazi Party had understood the true nature of monetary policy and economic systems, and directed their efforts towards reforming or challenging the institutions responsible, history might have unfolded differently. Their focus on scapegoating Jewish people, instead of addressing systemic economic challenges, tragically led to one of the darkest periods in human history. This time around I think humanity must go off to you the financial institutions who dictate this debt nonsense as if we are indebted to the machinations of the financial institutions.
The IMF and World Bank, emblematic of an entrenched and pernicious financial orthodoxy, perpetuate a draconian paradigm predicated upon the omnipresent specter of debt, a construct wielded with insidious precision to maintain hegemonic control over both individuals and sovereign entities. This paradigm, underpinned by an ostensible legitimacy, operates not as a benign fiscal framework but as an apparatus of subjugation, where debt functions as the sine qua non of economic governance, ensnaring nations in an interminable cycle of fiscal servitude and dependence. Debt, within this construct, transcends its ostensible definition as a mere numerical liability; it metamorphoses into an omnipresent specter that colonizers the collective consciousness, its existence perpetuated not by tangible necessity but by a systemic indoctrination that affronts the very essence of human intellect. The perpetuation of debt, an ostensibly ubiquitous and immutable reality, is in fact a meticulously cultivated illusion, a mental mirage that has been inculcated into the zeitgeist through relentless reiteration and institutional endorsement. This indoctrination is an affront to our collective intelligence, a testament to the pervasive influence of financial orthodoxy that subordinates rational inquiry to dogmatic adherence. The institutions in question promulgate a narrative wherein debt is portrayed as an inextricable component of economic existence, a narrative that obfuscates the reality of alternative economic paradigms. These paradigms, historical and contemporaneous, offer a vision of economic interaction devoid of the debilitating yoke of debt, emphasizing instead the principles of mutual aid, resource-based economies, and localized financial autonomy. The refusal to acknowledge these alternatives underscores a deliberate strategy to perpetuate a system that privileges profit over people, growth over sustainability, and financial hegemony over equitable development. This paradigm’s most egregious manifestation is the imposition of neoliberal economic policies, euphemistically termed ‘structural adjustments,’ that eviscerate social safety nets, exacerbate inequality, and entrench poverty. These policies are not merely misguided but are fundamentally inimical to the principles of social justice and human dignity. By coercing nations into adopting these measures, the IMF and World Bank entrench a system of global apartheid where the wealthy elite consolidate power at the expense of the impoverished majority. The narrative of debt as an inexorable reality is a fallacy perpetuated by institutions that thrive on the perpetuation of inequality and dependency. This narrative is not a reflection of economic inevitability but a strategic indoctrination that insults our collective intelligence. The urgent imperative is to dismantle this paradigm, repudiating the myth of debt and envisioning a new epoch of economic relations predicated upon equity, sustainability, and human flourishing. Continuing this trenchant critique, we must eviscerate the fallacious notion that money, in its inception and perpetuation, must invariably be conjured through the alchemy of debt and wielded exclusively by august financial institutions. This dogma, enshrined within the hallowed halls of economic orthodoxy, propagates the notion that fiat currency, a mere construct of collective belief, must be birthed and nurtured within the sanctum of debt-laden paradigms. The contemporary monetary system, wherein fiat currency derives its ostensible value not from tangible assets but from an abstract, consensual faith in governmental and institutional authority, is a testament to the enduring power of entrenched ideological constructs. Fiat currency, unmoored from intrinsic worth, subsists on the collective credulity of the populace, who have been meticulously conditioned to accept its value as an immutable truth. This unquestioned faith in fiat currency, meticulously cultivated by financial oligarchs, is tantamount to a secular religion, wherein the masses are indoctrinated to revere these ephemeral symbols of wealth. The insistence that money must be created through debt is a pernicious fallacy that serves to entrench the power of financial elites while perpetuating a cycle of economic dependency and subjugation. This system, wherein money is ostensibly 'created' through the issuance of debt by banks and financial institutions, positions these entities as omnipotent arbiters of economic fate. Such a system is not merely inequitable but is fundamentally antithetical to the principles of democratic self-determination and economic justice. In truth, the creation of money need not be tethered to the issuance of debt. Historical precedents and contemporary innovations in monetary theory reveal a plethora of alternative mechanisms for generating and distributing currency. These include state-issued currencies, local and community-based currencies, and digital currencies, all of which can operate independently of the debt paradigm. By decoupling the creation of money from debt, we can envision a system wherein currency serves as a genuine medium of exchange and store of value, rather than an instrument of control wielded by financial oligarchs. Furthermore, the very essence of fiat currency-predicated upon collective belief-invites a radical reevaluation of its function and value. If fiat currency derives its worth from the faith of the populace, then it follows that this faith can be redirected towards systems that prioritize equity, sustainability, and
The dominant paradigms espoused by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank entail a comprehensive scrutiny of the global financial framework, bearing profound implications for economic autonomy, developmental pathways, and socio-economic fairness. Let us meticulously analyze the existing critiques of these esteemed bodies, with particular emphasis on their contributions to sustaining debt reliance and economic dominance. The perpetuation of debt dependency by the IMF and World Bank is a critical concern. These institutions frequently proffer loans to nations grappling with financial distress, ostensibly to stabilize economies and foster development. However, these loans are invariably accompanied by stringent conditions, known as structural adjustment programs (SAPs), which mandate austerity measures, privatization of public assets, and deregulation. Such conditions can exacerbate economic hardship, diminish public expenditure on essential services, and escalate the debt burden, thereby ensnaring nations in a vicious cycle of dependency. Second, there is the erosion of economic sovereignty. By imposing conditionalities, the IMF and World Bank effectively dictate the economic policies of sovereign nations, thereby undermining their autonomy. These conditions often prioritize market-oriented reforms that conform to neoliberal economic principles, which may be incongruous with the specific needs and contexts of the borrowing countries. This imposition can engender public discontent and social unrest, as local populations bear the brunt of policy shifts that privilege external creditors over domestic welfare. Third, the promotion of a neoliberal agenda is a salient critique. Both institutions have been instrumental in disseminating and entrenching neoliberal economic policies globally. These policies emphasize free markets, open economies, and minimal government intervention, often at the expense of social equity and environmental sustainability. The emphasis on liberalization and deregulation has precipitated increased economic volatility, financial crises, and widening income inequality, benefiting multinational corporations and financial elites while marginalizing vulnerable populations. Fourth, the impact on social services and public welfare is profound. The austerity measures prescribed by the IMF and World Bank typically entail reductions in public spending on healthcare, education, and social protection. Such cuts can have deleterious effects on the most vulnerable segments of society, undermining human development and exacerbating poverty. The focus on fiscal discipline over social investment often results in deteriorating public services and infrastructure, thereby hindering long-term developmental prospects. There is the issue of environmental degradation. The development projects financed by the World Bank, particularly in infrastructure and extractive industries, have frequently resulted in environmental degradation and the displacement of local communities. The prioritization of large-scale projects over sustainable and inclusive development models has raised concerns regarding the ecological footprint and social costs of these initiatives. Advocating for debt cancellation and reparations for historical exploitation and resource extraction can provide a fresh start for indebted nations. This approach acknowledges the exploitative nature of past lending practices and seeks to rectify historical injustices. Encouraging the development of regional financial institutions and cooperation frameworks can offer alternatives to the IMF and World Bank, tailored to the specific needs and contexts of member countries. These institutions can promote regional integration, economic solidarity, and development strategies that prioritize local needs over external interests. Embracing development models that prioritize social equity, environmental sustainability, and economic resilience is imperative. Approaches such as the circular economy, cooperative enterprises, and community-led development can provide more sustainable and inclusive pathways to growth. Ensuring that financial and development institutions operate transparently and inclusively, with meaningful participation from affected communities and civil society, can enhance accountability and responsiveness to local needs. This shift necessitates the democratization of decision-making processes and a commitment to social justice. Lastly, reforming the global financial architecture to address systemic imbalances and promote fairer trade, investment, and finance practices is essential. This involves rethinking the rules and norms that govern international finance, challenging the dominance of financial capital, and fostering a more equitable distribution of global wealth.The current paradigms of the IMF and World Bank have entrenched economic dependency, eroded sovereignty, and perpetuated inequality. A fundamental rethinking of these institutions and the global financial system is necessary to promote a more just, equitable, and sustainable world. This transformation requires bold action, innovative thinking, and a commitment to the values of solidarity, justice, and human dignity. The global banking system, marked by its complexity and pervasive reach, operates on principles and practices that often perpetuate inequality, undermine sovereignty, and prioritize profit over people. Herein, we delve into the intrinsic flaws and systemic issues within these financial institutions, underscoring the necessity for a radical reimagining of how money, credit, and resources are managed. The creation of money and debt by modern banking systems, which operate on a fractional reserve basis, warrants scrutiny. Banks are only required to keep a fraction of their deposits in reserve while lending out the majority. This process inherently generates new money and, consequently, debt. While this can stimulate economic activity, it also fosters a debt-dependent economy where both individuals and nations are perpetually in debt. This system amplifies economic cycles, leading to booms and busts that disproportionately affect the most vulnerable. The concentration of wealth and power within banking systems is a critical issue. Large financial institutions, through their control of capital flows, wield significant influence over economic policies and political decisions. This concentration undermines democratic processes and exacerbates economic inequalities, as financial elites hold disproportionate sway over the economic destinies of nations and communities. Inequitable lending practices are pervasive. Banks often engage in discriminatory lending, prioritizing loans to profitable ventures and wealthier individuals while marginalizing low-income communities and small enterprises. This exacerbates social inequalities and limits economic opportunities for those who need them most. Additionally, high-interest rates and predatory lending practices trap individuals in cycles of debt and poverty. Financial crises and economic instability are inherent risks in the interconnected nature of global banking systems. Financial crises in one part of the world can rapidly spread to others, causing widespread economic instability. The 2008 financial crisis, for instance, highlighted the systemic risks inherent in the banking system, where the failure of major financial institutions precipitated a global economic downturn, affecting millions of lives. Ethical and environmental concerns arise from many banks' financing of industries and projects that contribute to environmental degradation and social harm, such as fossil fuel extraction, deforestation, and arms manufacturing. The prioritization of short-term profits over long-term sustainability and ethical considerations undermines efforts to address pressing global challenges like climate change and social justice. Alternatives and Solutions public and cooperative banking, owned and operated by the public or their members, prioritize social goals over profit. These institutions can provide more equitable access to credit, support local development, and reinvest profits back into communities. Models like Germany's Sparkassen (public savings banks) or cooperative credit unions offer examples of more inclusive and socially responsible banking practices. Encouraging decentralized and community-based financial systems can empower local communities and reduce dependence on centralized banking institutions. Initiatives like local currencies, peer-to-peer lending, and community investment funds can foster economic resilience and support sustainable local development. Strengthening regulatory frameworks and oversight mechanisms can mitigate the risks associated with banking practices. Ensuring transparency, accountability, and ethical standards in banking operations can protect consumers, promote financial stability, and reduce the likelihood of crises. Promoting financial inclusion and literacy is crucial for empowering individuals and communities.
Asrar sb agr ap nain Allama Iqbal ke awareness call study ke hoti to yakinun ap ko hayroni na hoti to sunya min ap ko sonay daita hon.. JIS ILM KE TASIIR SAY ZUN [ORAT] HOTI HA NA ZUN ... KHTAY HAIN ISI ILM KO ARBAAB- EA-? MZR MOUT
The USA would probably still use the same high income tax as it does now along with the VAT. So people would pay even more. Of course more could be used for "Social" programs. Socialism at it's best? Ya right . . .
IMF is not the righteous helping hand….hard working taxpayers, who generously ‘loan’ money out to developing countries are the benefactors. That is a very important factor to remember. Especially when so many of those loans are NOT PAID BACK!
Respectful Greetings! To: International Monetary Fund - IMF. Good morning. It is an honor to speak to so many great colleagues and friends. In my remarks today, I would like to comment on the themes of our panel, including the changing role of the Bretton Woods institutions over the past 80 years, present-day challenges to multilateralism. Bretton Woods established a system of payments based on the dollar, which defined all currencies in relation to the dollar, itself convertible into gold, and above all, "as good as gold" for trade. U.S. currency was now effectively the world currency, the standard to which every other currency was pegged. At the top of its organizational structure is the Board of Governors, consisting of one governor (usually the minister of finance or the governor of the central bank) and one alternate governor from each member country. All powers of the IMF are vested in the Board of Governors. The day-to-day work of the IMF is overseen by its 24-member Executive Board, which represents the entire membership and is supported by IMF staff. The Managing Director is the head of the IMF staff and Chair of the Executive Board and is assisted by four Deputy Managing Directors. The IMF has 18 departments that carry out its country, policy, analytical, and technical work. Have a blessed week! I take advantage of the occasion to congratulate the 80th anniversary of the Institution of IMF. Luís Van-Dúnem
Thank you to the respected senior Ms.Kristalina for sharing, It's touched and with hopes perspective for the world and people better. Much Appreciated.
Respectful Greetings! International Monetary Fund - IMF. The U.S. economy has proven itself to be robust, dynamic, and adaptable to changing global conditions. Activity and employment continue to exceed expectations (notably, relative to those at the time of the 2023 Article IV Consultation) and the disinflation process has been considerably less costly than many had feared. The U.S. economy has turned in a remarkable performance over the past few years. Hysteresis effects from the pandemic did not materialize and both activity and employment now exceed pre-pandemic expectations. Job growth has been particularly fast, with 16 million new jobs created since end-2020. The near-term distribution of risks for activity are assessed to be broadly balanced. Consumption and Investment could exceed expectations, driven by a healthy labor market, rising real incomes, and wealth gains. Similarly, Supply Side gains from higher productivity and the inflow of foreign labor could persist. On the other hand, downside risks could arise from the complex global geopolitical environment or from a slower path of disinflation and a resulting higher path for interest rates. I fully thank the IMF Executive Board Members for your explanation of the U.S. Economy: Kristalina Georgieva - Managing Director Julie Kozack - Director: Communications Department Rodrigo Valdés - Director: Western Hemisphere Department Nigel Chalk - Deputy Director: Western Hemisphere Department Best Regards! A Blessed Week.
All lies U.S is only surviving on santioned & creased billions of dollar accounts of other countries and still publishing new dollar but the thing is what effects economy is its own terrorism and self imposing wars on other countries and is justified as they think, but on ground inflation speaks louder then all propagated lies, working & labour class don't even have a chance to save their house or else and ended up on roads, cars or trailers as their shalter. Business condition's are not well and bank interest and lack of governance had poured a lot of damage but more of all there's no government policy for to save businesses they can't protect people after made a cop country and this policy for corruption it's failed to protect people and their businesses. It's a fake presentation only portraits corporate interest money trail of foreign influenced state.❗🖐️✌️
No stable coin and other coins like bitcoin, which is not a stable coin are not the same thing. Stable coins are going to be used to digitally back paper currency transactions because they are backedback by hard assets like gold or silver They are stable because they are pegged to it. Bitcoin can never be asset backed. It’s not design that way so you can’t call bitcoin a stable coin.
Addressing youth unemployment can significantly benefit economies by fostering economic growth, reducing poverty, and enhancing social stability. By creating job opportunities for young people, economies can tap into their potential for innovation, drive productivity, and support sustainable development.
