Scotland’s Farm Advisory Service (FAS) provides information and resources aimed at increasing the profitability and sustainability of farms and crofts.
aka get people to grow less food to restrict food supplies for more totalitarian controls. next you'll tell me the chicken registry is for consumer safety.
As an outsider, it's very difficult to divest the elements of government propaganda, environmental activism, and socialized or subsidized farming with the hard-earned economic gains realized by crofters. Under all the glitz and polish, the crofters actually work for a living, unlike these university-educated pencil pushing agronomists and activists. It's sad that their reach is even to the ends of the earth, which North Uist really is. These people have taken an historical and vital link to subsistence agriculture and turned it into a modern case study on agribusiness that is part of the Green agenda. Scotland used to be better than this.
This is blatantly anti human rights, they want to stop us having any form of self sufficiency, what about wild birds, Charles is going to register all his swans is he? How about sparrows and pheasants? How about the free range peacocks roaming the countryside, this is about control masquerading as 'safety,' its disgusting, its evil, and anyone supporting it is a vile traitor.
😂😂 Law ffs 🤣😂🤣... well not unless your daft enough to sign upcreating a legally binding CONtract thus allowing it to be tolerated as law! It actually guidence an regulation and even says that on their own heffing webpage, IF YOU OPEN YOUR EYES that is, where registration is listed.... as usual APHA doesnt know its arse from its elbow, because it then commits fraud blatantly by claiming its against the law not to register, when this is actually based on regulation... i.e. its upon them to get folk to register... since when has ANY consented act been created in 6 months from a consultation.... FACT...IT NEVER HAS.... they are talking out of their arse FACT. IF THEY come to you in the physical or by letter hit their CEO and demand material proof of the consent of the governed supporting the ACT they claim to be law... if they wont and cant, then it isnt law! demand proof via a notice with 14 days response time.
Utter Bollocks so what about all the wild birds that you cannot control but can and do carry flu. Maybe sort out the conditions you keep farmed birds in and you wouldn’t have such a problem.
We have ended up with a lot of wild corn for the first time and couch grass for the first time would this be down to been missing out on the spray that was used or come in with the seed that was bought 😮😮
I spoke to a lady at our local rural payments office who said New Entrant Scheme is still available through central allocation. That was today 23 08.24
The big thing with net zero is to make sure everything is being measured, cows do not produce methane they only convert plant based methane to gas a very different thing.
Can't see the forest for the trees comes to mind. Institutions like yours are lost in the science and numbers and are fighting nature at every step. The goal of science is to understand how the natural world works, somewhere along the line capitalism stepped in and took you down a path of endless data and inputs. Agriculture existed for long enough without inputs and for even longer without manipulative salesmen masquerading as agricultural scientists
i grew up on this farm and my father was the farm manager, interesting to see the new processes in place today, sperm samples were taken using a cow and an artifical vagina, i remember this being done and it was a very stressful time of the year
I still cannot figure out how this helps me in any fashion. I can see the cattle... I can read the tag. How can this be implemented to actually benefit me? It seems that it does nothing more than I can do with a pencil and a pocket notebook. At a MUCH higher cost.
Do not hurt them, or cause pain do not eat them they are of the tree of knowledge of good and evil or you follow that slaughterhouse God .Love all, despise evil.
Security Theater: Definition: Practices that appear to enhance security but do little to improve it. Examples: Airport security (shoe removal, liquid limits), visible police presence (patrols, random checks), and superficial ID checks. Characteristics: Symbolic actions that reassure without real security, divert resources from effective measures, and create an illusion of safety. Criticism: Ineffective, leading to complacency and false security; costly with minimal benefits; causes public stress and inconvenience. Purpose and Impact: Reassures the public, deters minor threats, and demonstrates action and control. Conclusion: Calms fears but lacks effectiveness, wasting resources and misleading the public. Control Theories: Government Control: Increased surveillance, conditioning public to accept control. Economic Gain: Benefits security firms, boosts security sector, supports World Economic Forum (WEF) supports reducing meat production Political Motives: Manipulates fear to control public, distracts from other issues. Social Engineering: Conditions behavior, normalizes surveillance. False Sense of Security: Prevents demand for real measures, maintains order through perceived safety.
