You might as well have kept it a pistol. You’re not even running the cheek piece. Sig sells the brace without the cheek piece. Absolutely makes no sense to have SBRd that if you are not going to run the cheek piece
I absolutely hate that lower. The magwell is too far forward. The operations are too far forward. It just sucks!!! The price? Sig...GFY!!! That arc well for a bipod or tripod should never have been put on this rifle. It absolutely ruins it.
Unfortunately it's hit or miss with this one. The influencers don't seem to have any problems but the public is sending them back. It's a cool gun for movie fan boys but everyone else is complaining. This is according to my extensive research. Chipped strikers, Failure to go into battery, poor Ciricoat. I have a TP9FX which needed a new trigger. Also according to your video, the compensator isn't doing anything so it's a waste of about three hundred dollars. Most gun people don't care about those extras since we already own that stuff. I have a S&W M&P with a new trigger which out performs the TP9FSX. I might buy a Rival Steel which will out perform this one.
Hey I live literally 2 miles from you guys. Used you as my FFL for a PSA purchase a couple months ago. Just getting into the AR game and have been looking for a good outdoor range that's relatively close. You guys got any suggestions?
@@WatchdogTactical Thanks for the suggestion! Just looked them up. Seems like a really nice establishment. Also, I got a lower coming to you guys. :P Should be there Wednesday. I'll see you then!
Yes, with our Undercover elite holster. It's a heavier carry but, it's definitely usable. Smaller belly approved. If you have a gut the magwell will print. Usually it's in a QLS leg rig setup.
Very good comparison. These are both so light. I have a hybrid46, I like the versatility but I hunt with it and Id love to shed some barrel end weight. If both were in stock which one do you prefer?