thank you for your information ,if you don't mind let me ask you some questions about FGD .1. what is the unit of analysis in FGD ? 2. how can we analyze the data that emerge from FGD ( there are different ideas in FGD , and there are a lot of codes and themes in FGD, so which theme is going to report ? is maximum variation with in the group or across the group ?
This is very comprehensive and useful. Thank you! I would love to use this method to teach students in my class- Could you share how you made use of these animations, please?
Thank you for this, writing a test on all of it soon. The notes overcomplicated everything so much I couldn't understand anything anymore. This helped a lot.
The example about the coffee being tasty technically exemplified abductive reasoning, and abductive reasoning is by no means less common than deduction and abduction. Rather, its formalization systems are less developed and less explicitly utilized. However, as Charles Sanders Peirce noted, all coherent sensory perception involves abductive reasoning. Your perception of words on a screen is actually the conclusion of an abductive argument. You see words on the screen because you unconsciously reason these specific words being on a screen is the best explanation for the patterns of variation within your visual qualia. And of course, distinction between and within sensory phenomena is itself deductive argumentation, and unconsciously associating those distinctions with past distinctions per common patterns is inductive argumentation. In truth, all three types of reasoning are used in a continuous stream of argumentation that constitutes you as a being.
