Perspective is the ultimate arts channel. We've got music, theatre, opera, paintings and much more. Subscribe and hit the bell notification for the ultimate cultural experience!
Perspective is part of the Little Dot Studios Network. To get in touch please email owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
At 1:48:01. Wot???? The world authority on a French painter is a British professor? Quelle horreur!!!! What happened to the Wildenstein Institute? Is Delaroche too small fries for these grand judges of French art? Do the paintings have to be worth over $10 million before the grand dames of Wildenstein bring down their upturned noses to do some corrupt and misguided judging?
A hidden work by a great artist and found be an individual who did believe in the work throughout his own life. It is a great painting. This was a good story. (Sorry about the commercials to ruin parts of it.)
I first saw this painting as a child, and as I grew up I always understood the power of it, as well as the red hat painting. My father was a portrait/ mystical theory painter with human figures in them always. Watching him paint and seeing his works, brought me insight to strong works like Vermeers'.
There is a great long hour and a half interview of Gadd by Danish Comedian Sofie Hagen 5/10/2016 That explains some things it is on Apple Podcasts or Global Podcasts under the title Who Hurt You : Richard Gadd - Eye contact, anger black-outs and parents
Mary of Magdeline was a follower of Jesus and probably his wife. If she was good enough to learn from Jesus why do we listen to men who are so jealous of the attention Jesus and his mother gave her?
There's nothing to understand about her mind. She was an intelligent woman who was wildly inconsistent in her evaluations, often completely arbitrary, and FAR more often wrong than not.
Just want to let you know, i use to like your videos until this video of our US Presidents in Mount Rushmore, WA. your disrespect to piss on the side of the mountain facing the sculptures, just because the Indians disagreed that being built there, yes history has many faults and Briton has it's biggest treasonous against many other country ..i would appreciate you have more respect for our first great Presidents of the US.. i won't watch any of your video ever unless I have an apologies from you..every American should do the same not watch your videos
What if history is made up - how can we believe anything? The powers to be controlled our perception of reality. In 1452 ? So like Michael De’Angelo painted the sistene chapel in a very short time without previous experience? I believe these incredible paintings and incredible marble statues are possibly made by Artificial intelligence. The renaissance was an amazing time with incredible advancements in technology. Far more advanced than we are today. The unbelievable innovations that were used in painting were incredible. Look at the amazing buildings that we can’t build right now either -it’s like media coverage on the great pyramid of Egypt when there are thousands of Pyramids in the ocean and around the world obviously from the same period. While he was doing the sisteenth chapel he apparently carved hundreds of statues perfectly out of marble. With no experience. Prior to the reset of the world early 1800’s and mud flood. Which these magnificent pieces survived, along with the great huge stone buildings. I’ve read that we have had numerous resets. These absolutely stunning amazing paintings can’t be replicated neither can the statues. The great Statue of Liberty apparently has the face of a male ? Not pretty? Not sure myself. The faces on both the paintings and statues are so life like, and beautiful.
If you were to discuss let's say, the skill of a plastic surgeon, would you get a medical historian to narrate...or another plastic surgeon. All these opinions add nothing in my view about his work, but a lot about his life which is the normal struggle to survive.
Could you imagine what she would have been in the age of the internet? She essentially was the first great blogger -- she carved out a place for her fantastic analytic abilites in a time when the platforms were so very limited. Bravo...
While edited for time, I am surprised they didn't analyze the back of the painting and the canvas itself. Usually, the back can reveal as much as the front, with auction or dealer notations. The canvas could also disclose the date and location. Why did Montemezzano used a seamed canvas for a major work? Could they get closer to the date of the painting? In the end, that's superfluous information, but I surprised they didn't explore that further.
It's funny that you are supposedly doing a serious piece on Viking art, and then your thumbnail is the ridiculous Viking helmet with the horns that never happened. Not funny and really stupid on your part.
I do not agree that being a fake in the second episode is a pity. It is a very interesting story nonetheless, and it is a nice drawing. Probably the best of Durig, right? It is just not as expensive. Everybody knows Rodin, but not necessarily Durig.
Funny the movement in Britain and Bristol born (according to this documentary) out from under the thumb of Margaret Thatcher would come full circle to identify with her vision.
Let me translate what Yoko just said! IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWWWWWWWWWUUUUUUUUUUUUYYYYYYYYYYYYYYAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! Chuck Berry roll eyes...
