Subscribe to Nagwa and get ready to venture into a world of learning with high-quality videos being uploaded regularly.
Focusing on maths, physics, and chemistry, our videos explore key topics, helping students learn and develop their interest in the subject.
For more educational content please visit nagwa.com. We have over 40,000 practice questions, 2000 video lessons, presentations, and worksheets for students around the world - all for free!
As a general rule, if you want to go to good University then getting into grammar school is essential, certainly for Oxford and Cambridge and courses in medicine and law. It is possible to get into University from main stream comprehensive schools, but not into Oxford or Cambridge. For instance if you want to study medicine to be a doctor you will need to have had a grammar school education. Most medical schools will expect this.
Our kid passed with 90% but didn’t get a place at Grammar as it was oversubscribed. He now has to go to rough violent inner-city secondary school. All his hard work and intelligence ruined as he tries to learn amongst kids who don’t. Seriously do not put your kids through the stress and devastation of doing the 11+ and not getting into grammar because passing the 11 plus is no guarantee of getting a place. Grammar selection is so corrupt. A lot of kids who do get places, get in because their parents know the right people. Nepotism comes to mind.
so basically don't try in life because if you fail it's going to be hard? and violent inn-city secondary? are you saying no secondary schools are any good? what bs is this. The stuff your child learned would be used to work hard in secondary. you don't always get to take the path you need to get to your destination. that's part of life, and the earlier they learn the better. you sound like you made the story up, have a hard time believing you
@@percy9228 Ok fair comment. But the 11 plus is unlike any other exam and getting into grammar is a pure lottery. What sort of message does it give that you can pass something but be failed at the same time especially for an 11 year old child? These are children not grown adults in the bookies, is it fair their future is decided by a lottery? Maybe I was being a bit harsh saying that Grammar selection is corrupt. There are other bigger reasons why those who pass fail to get a place. Grammar schools have seen no expansion in the last 14 years. That’s why there aren’t enough places for all who pass the 11 plus. They’ve never had funding to build new classrooms or recruit extra teachers due to the austerity of the last government, a government that was supposed to be pro-grammar school. Finally it really is distressing for parents and their children when they are denied a place after passing the 11 plus, their future plans destroyed at such a young age. Nowadays if you want to get in to Medical school for instance, they won’t consider your application unless you’ve been to Grammar school. The same with top universities like Oxbridge and Cambridge, they generally do not accept students who didn’t go to grammar.
Why you did not try various school . I tried my child on 5 school . You shouldn’t limit your child to one grammar. Children can travel far distances to school .
@@NotabiPro yeah man apparently in england idk in primary schools they do 11+ now in my time its just SATs and straight to secondary school no matter if you flopped or not?
Did you pass? I’ve got mine in a few weeks can you please tell me some tips or if it’s hard or not because I’m one of the smartest in my year and get a 75-80% on my tests (they are 12-13 books and 11 years old) so can you please tell me if it’s hard?
Yeah I did mine and passed with 236% (220 was the pass mark) and we did not have to do English and mathematics as our area of the country does not do it I’m from western Lincolnshire and I’m now going to a grammar school-Kesteven girls grammar school.
@@marcg1686 A ilu ludzi ukrywało prawdę o fałszywym wirusie, aż medycy mieli premie kovidowe i zlikwidowali nawet grypę, a seryjny wirus podobno grasował w lasach i nawet zarażał nieboszczyków na cmentarzach. Radar widzi w atmosferze od wschodniego Morza Bałtyckiego do Kapsztad w RPA, prawie 11 tysięcy km, a wiązka mikrofal radaru leci dokładnie po liniach prostych i mierzy prędkość w każdym kierunku pocisku, odległość, wysokość, lewo-prawo, rozmiary i to przez mgłę oraz przez chmury oraz ma elewację. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KDh5acCjrWg.html
Either I'm dumb or you made a slight mistake around the 4:18 mark on the left side 3 row 5 x (4) --> 570x + 50y = 30000 (6), is it really 5 x (4)? because when I did 5 x (5) I got the 3 sums but with number 4 I didn't '='
I proved on 09/14/2016 the ONLY POSSIBLE proof of the Great Fermat's Theorem (Fermata!). I can pronounce the formula for the proof of Fermath's great theorem: 1 - Fermath's great theorem NEVER! and nobody! NOT! HAS BEEN PROVEN !!! 2 - proven! THE ONLY POSSIBLE proof of Fermat's theorem 3 - Fermath's great theorem is proved universally-proven for all numbers 4 - Fermath's great theorem is proven in the requirements of himself! Fermata 1637 y. 5 - Fermath's great theorem proved in 2 pages of a notebook 6 - Fermath's great theorem is proved in the apparatus of Diophantus arithmetic 7 - the proof of the great Fermath theorem, as well as the formulation, is easy for a student of the 5th grade of the school to understand !!! 8 - Me! opened the GREAT! A GREAT Mystery! Fermath's theorem! (not "simple" - "mechanical" proof) !!!!- NO ONE! and NEVER! (except ME! .. of course!) .............
This is not physical law of earth.. sorry.. Learn real physics.... erstosthenes used parallel rays.. not reality.. Your shadow is larger because that's physical laws of the sun.. if it's your shadow.. larger.. the shadow of clouds.. larger.. the shadow of the moon ..larger.. flat earth moon 30 miles wide.. shadow 70mile wide.. laws of diverging light rays. just not on a globe.. because the moon somehow changes the laws of physics and has converging light rays.. yet reality is reality.. laws are laws. In physics they are what governs earth... Diverging light Now please look at the sun. I'm not wasting my time any longer with people denying of reality. Ignorant to reality or law. Light only comes from spherical objects diverging.. when you look at the sun. Test upon it.. it has diverging light.. not parallel and converging.. Sun is close local and diverging.. pretty obvious.. not looking down a tractor beam of parallel of light.. Looking at a ball spreading light upon earth with diverging light rays.. images.app.goo.gl/pE9xKCwgLjgqhKAw8 again We are not looking down a spotlight tractor beam.. please get a grip.. if we were the sun would look much different to us. Really think about it.. you would look at the sun.. and everyone would be looking down one sun ray.. coming from a massive ball.. just one ray engulfs the entire earth.. lmao.. please really think about what your saying.. and have a look at clear evidence. since you won't leave the house or look at the sun.. Diverging light rays.. spreading .. science of light and spheres. Never ever parallel or converging.. images.app.goo.gl/9gbXSyuVS7Aod7hk9 images.app.goo.gl/5pSMmiYGEMuAJJP59 images.app.goo.gl/uncJpo4WiojEh1RE6 images.app.goo.gl/cCpQcyf7RW98LRfh9 images.app.goo.gl/7bYA7TeoDMnyLiq57 images.app.goo.gl/X9PNBLpmg8o4G7NN7 images.app.goo.gl/pz4aK4puPqasb99A9 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IpqL0D82xn8.html As stated you would need to be seriously stupid to think your looking down one light ray that's parallel and engulfing the entirety of earth. Sun light has endless rays all diverging..
You don't understand basic geometry. Light rays from the Sun arrive almost parallel. Take a magnifying glass and try to focus light from an incandescent light source to a single point. You won't be able to. Take that magnifying glass and go outside and repeat the exercise. You will be able to focus the sunlight to a single point. Because the light rays are parallel.
hello i have a question whether this formula can be implemented in indoor positioning ? if its possible what unit for the distance is it meter or cm (sorry my broken english)
He was not Greek he was Libyan. Yes he dabbled in various things but he never studied Geology. There is virtually no evidence of his experiment, any books referring to him were written many centuries later filling in large gaps. He was allegedly born around the time of an Olympiad so he determined this was the first to be recorded despite many taking place before his era. The distance from Alexandria to Syene was not measured by him he relied on others to give him that information which varied depending on who you listened to. The stade used as a measurement varied by region so a Greek stade differed from an Egyptian which one did he use? During this time there were virtually no maps and the only area they knew was around the Mediterranean. The well mentioned had some spiritual connection which was one of his interests. The US military allegedly carried out a similar experiment over a much wider area but i have not found their results, maybe it is classified who knows, why should it be? If anyone has that data It would be great if we could see it.
You don't need to make the assumption that the track is straight. It's literally in the opening statement. And why can't a straight track exist on a curved bearing ? Do you think the floor of a house follows the curvature of the earth ?
Load of horse crap. Both carts travel at 3kmph and combined speed is 6 kmph so they meet in 1 hour. Fly flies at 6kmph. It flies until horses meet (for 1 hour) so it travels 6 km. No need to calculate all the turns.
@nohay The video discusses exactly this solution at 8.40. If you'd taken the time to watch it you'd know this and that it makes your comment as redundant as the longer calculation based on all the turns. You contributed nothing.
@@colinshaw9923 Bullshit. He contributed a massive saving in time over what you'd waste if you sat through the video. You just workout how long the vehicles will take to cover the distance and multiply that by the speed of the insect. Done. One fucking sentence.
Dividing 0 by 0 to equal one can cause problems,as you can use this to prove various things that aren't true.You have to examine carefully how the two zeros were arrived at.Am I correct to assume from the solution offered here that defining zero to the power of zero as one causes no such problems ?
At about 9:14 to 9:32+ how did you find the radius of the orbit to be 23631000 M? Wouldn't the radius be the sum of 6371000 + 20000000 = 26371000 M? (Okay, when I used that value I get the same circumference as depicted, 165693879.7 M, so I guess the 23631000 value is just a typo.)
