Who's ever heard of choson ninja? www.bullshido.net/forums/showthread.php?t=59853 Choson wrote"Enough said and I am sure those who wants the truth will find out that Yamaguchi's assassins are Koreans" The Yamaguchi is Yamaguchi-gumi mafia.
Saved threads and PMs sites.google.com/site/chosonninjahumblesensei/system/app/pages/sitemap/hierarchy
ChosonNinja VS tayounorise sites.google.com/site/chosonninjahumblesensei/Home/re-uniform-question-1st-japanese-palace
ninjer.blog.shinobi.jp/Entry/283/
ChosonNinja Wiki www14.atwiki.jp/choson666/
Who is ChosonNinja? halto112.blogspot.com/
A magazine article about ChosonNinja www.mumyouan.com/k/?M1051
Korean Ninja Fraud on RU-vid blog.livedoor.jp/tonchamon/archives/51690584.html blog.livedoor.jp/tonchamon/archives/51995442.html
Any Anglo-American bigots who think Korean is closely related to Manchurian must not forget the ruthless Qing Manchu invasion of Joseon. The Joseon Koreans allied with Ming and regarded Manchus as "barbarians" at the time. Koreans have more southern haplogroups than Manchurians, including O2a.
Your info it's too shallow. Buyeo is Korean ancestry. Koguruo/ BaekJei is of Buyeo. Sheila is people of Han/Korea-Han and of people migrated from a North where in Manchu area/a part of Old Joseon a bc era. They are all an remnants of Go·Jo·Seon/Old Joseon/by Korean Year Calendar since Go·Jo·Seon/ year 2021👉 year4355... In fact... Mongol/Kitan/Jerchen/Magyar... Are all remnants of Old Joseon. There are Dolmens and Lute-shaped Bronze Daggers throughout Korean Peninsula, Manchu regions, and Sandong regions.... Those are different from Sino cultures in today's central China area. Found no Dolmen. And a bronze daggers found there it has a straight edge blade. And those Manchu tribes they recognize, what Kahn is. Yes, their Kahn is what Han is to Korea.... And further more... A founder of a later Joseon Dynasty, Yi Seong-Ghye, is also related to jurchen. And onr of Yi's kin folks who remained to north east of Korean Peninsula and Manchuria... Became a founder of Jerchen Empire defeated Sino China. And first Emperor of Jerchin (Chin Dynasty) conquered the China identified him self as Ae·Shin·Gak·Rah to ShinRah's Kim/Chin... You do have one thing that I would agree. "It's all politic" There are so many an untold history of a Far East and North East Asia. I think it would be an astonishing history once it is revealed.
Personally, as part Manchu. I'm quite annoyed that alot of Tungus Kingdoms are being branded as Koreans, without a doubt a lot of Balhae/Buyeo/Bohai ethnic racial groups subsequently was assimilated into the Korean peninsula and is a part of what is now Korean people (You could also say that the kingdoms of Bohai/Balhae/Buyeo/Goguryeo assimilated the Korean people as they adopted their name and pride from this point on). That doesn't mean that the Kingdoms itself was Korean, from my POV the states preceding Jumong/Goguryeo has always been a confederation of multi-ethnic races (Including Jurchens,Xianbei, Evenks, Aboriginals from the korean penisula). I have no qualms with Koreans claiming descendents from this dynasty, but calling it a Korean kingdom is questionable. Because if that is the case, Manchurians are largely assimilated into the 'Chinese/Han' culture, so does that mean that they could label Goguryeo/Rouran Khaganate/Dong Hu Khaganate as Chinese horde/empires ? Because the Chinese could claim descent from them as well ? The reaming jurchens/manchu that remained/assimilated in the Korea even after Qing has been established are called Jaegaseung, so could they call the Qing a Jaegaseung dynasty ?
Honestly if you're gonna be a historian you need to have an open mind at the very least. You should understand how much of a confucian country korea was at the time, it wasn't because they didn't want to look like Japanese people which is why they didn't wear patterned clothes, but because confucian values opposed flashiness. On top of that kisaengs weren't only people for upper class men to play with, they were skilled people who played instruments and danced. That's like saying geishas were solely prostitutes too. And at the very end its a drama not a documentary lmao
Funny little baffon, you claiming we are from Tung tribe because we share wooden sculptures?!? Most cultures by the sea including Japan uses similar wood sculptures. You dont have enough information because your own country censors your history, just like North Korea (you both have made-up, fabricated history). Communist censorship is the reason why you don't get it, you were not taught properly with complete history of neighboring countries. Probably, in your country, China created the world but in reality created CORONAVIRUS and says that it did not come from China! See how already they censoring information? Dont worry about other country's success and worry about your own country's failures and lies.
Some Manchurian tribes were absorbed into Korean, because different Manchurian tribes also fought each other, some of them escaped and allied with Koreans, which is quite understandable. The Ming and Korea both were trying to annex Manchurians at that time.
Memoirs of a Geisha was also full of inaccuracies which I understand because it is just a DRAMA and not a documentary. Hwang Jini is my favorite Korean drama.
Wooooww!! In my 18 years of existence, the only hwarang that I know is The Korean drama one 😂😂 and the actors there are my favorite! 😘 especially Taehyung, Park Seojun and Minho 😍😍
Im a korean and manchuria was part of korean history. This video lacks information and over simplifies to make a advantageous claim. It does not cover the fact about how goryeo is a continuous dynasty of goguryeo but no one would argue about if goryeo wasnt part of korean history. But the key point is that korea lost the territory long before the korean anarchist tried to spark the idea back. Mongols fucked us and china fucked us again then japan fucked everyone. End of debate
She is MKIYAWAKI Junko. Yeah, she had been a lecturer working for several colleges. To be more exact, she is a well-informed historian who chiefly majored in Oriental history.
The drama 황진이 is Historical Fiction loosely based on facts, i.e 황진이 did exist, wrote beautiful Sijo poems, etc. The drama, however, is not a documentary! It is not a biography! It is not a biographical documentary! Get a grip! This so-called “historical analysis” is asinine! It never ceases to amaze me how the Japanese are so jealous and disparaging of the Koreans. Such a pity!
I'd like to hear this channel's opinion on the Japanese occupation of Korea and their crimes and massacres. I wouldn't be surprised if they follow Japanese revisionist tendencies in those subjects.
Definately it was, after Gando(which means Manchu in Korean) Convention between the Japanese Empire and Qing, Chosun(former Korea) have lost its control over it. It is a historical fact you can easily find on the internet. Just google "Gando Convention"
I'm a Korean. I think you omitted Chosun. I mean the Old Chosun which is considered to have been in South Manchuria. Buyeo and Goguryo were established in its territory. And Silla has been told to be "the remaining people of Chosun."
I really liked what she said " they can create anything because there is nothing". Even if it is for entertainment purpose one should not tamper with history.
This is very interesting, I was wondering how samurai used yumi's with the stereotypical helmets you see, given that such helmets would certainly interfere with the usual kyudo technique as it is practiced today. But it seems like perhaps archers just didn't wear those big helmets, so no problem after all.
Why is she critically analyzing a DRAMA for god's sake? Can someone please tell me why she is being so serious over a trivial matter. They mention that the drama is fictional before viewers watch it FOR A REASON -- because it IS fiction. It's not a fucking history textbook. Obviously it's inaccurate and some parts are fabricated/adapted to modern culture to make the show more interesting. I actually can't believe the inherent racial hate I am watching in this professor's videos. What an analysis. Good job you stated the obvious that a historical drama is fictional.
Partially agreed. However, some Koreans learn their national history through dramas or light literature. The border between reality and fiction is so ambiguous for them, so they blindly believe that their country had been as flourishing as dramas. The most annoying is that they groundlessly brag of such fictional stories as if those were real. In fact, they would frequently cite depiction in these dramas as proof of insane delusion that ancient Korea had been superior to Japan.
To frame it as if Japanese people and culture are more superior is wrong and unethical. Please be careful with what you post and the meaning behind them. If you don't feel that this historical analysis or this type of video for that matter, is strongly biased or that you don't feel like this video is off, then you need to check your ignorance.
First of all, it's just a drama for the entertainment industry. Japan must also have dramas that are historically inaccurate. Second, even if you are a historian, isn't it a little low to shame another culture. Your words didn't outright do it, but the patronizing tone of voice along with the selective photo choices were hard not to notice. What is your point on dissecting a k-drama so critically? There seems to be some inherent racial bias here.