The Biotech Review channel is all about precise educational animated videos on Biotechnology, Molecular Biology and Biology. We believe that education should be fun and engaging, so we make videos that are short, entertaining as well as informative. Our videos are suitable for students of all ages, from elementary school to college. We also make videos for professionals who want to learn more about these fascinating subjects. Whether you're a student, a teacher, or a scientist, we hope you'll find our videos to be a valuable resource. So Please support us by watching our videos Thanks for watching!
I'm H63D Homozygous. Diagnosed with Hereditary Hemochromatosis after ferritin was found to be 827, I also had secondary polycythemia with unknown cause for a few years before I was diagnosed. My diagnosis was a long terrible road. At age 19 I started to feel sick often. Fatigue mostly along with aches. I also started having migraine with aura but no headache pain, just the colorful triangles spreading in my vision with spots where I couldn't see detail. These would progress for about 20 minutes and almost suddenly go away. At age 25 I began having painful migraines, usually every Tuesday. I spent a couple years with this trying to figure out what caused me to have these headaches on this particular day every week. I looked everywhere. Glasses, weekend habits, water etc. At this point I didn't realize I was having migraines. I felt like I was being poisoned. I got my water tested. Every time I had this headache, my body would stop producing urine (except once or twice) until I was getting over the headache. When I did urinate, it would be cloudy. The headaches lasted a day or two and I would be drinking a lot of water with excessive thirst. 5 Liters of water a day. I could never pinpoint the cause. At age 28 I went to a doctor. CBC and metabolism labs were fine. He Then sent me to several specialists. Kidney doctor shown that I was fine. Neurology doctor did an MRI and found spots of dense activity. I was diagnosed with fibromyalgia and CFS due to tiredness and painful stiff muscles and joints. Prescribed Topamax and sent home. The prescription did help with the weird symptoms and headaches. Side effects were a strange delay to the fizzy sensation from carbonated beverages. I lived like this for 10 more years. I felt like I was dying. I thought the headaches were going to kill me. At age 38 I had an incident when my BP rose to 190/104 and I thought I was having a heart attack and went to the emergency room. They did an EKG, told me I was fine and scheduled a doctor for me to see since I didn't have one for 10 years. I went to see him and after blood work, my RBC and hcrt was high. BP was 160/92. Sleep study was fine. JAK2 was screened for polycythemia vera allele and came back negative. Prescribed Varapamil, Sumatryptan, and Asprin. BP went down to 120/84 and as that as a migraine preventative along with the abortive, I was managing the migraines. At this point I came to realize the vast list of prodrome symptoms for migraines. 20 minutes after the Sumatryptan the headache would be gone, I would urinate properly, my guts would work "better", the color of the room changed to normal. At age 41 my doctor took a new position elsewhere and I got a new one. This doctor took one look at my history, received an update from me about my middle finger knuckle hurting and grinding, and then said "lets do an iron test, I think you have Hemochromatosis". I got the the labs. The next day he calls me at 8:00 in the morning to tell me about my ferritin and I go in after work. He does a genetic test for HFE mutations and the result a week later is H63D/H63D.
Well, after reading your whole life story and your sufferings, it makes me so sad that how you have gone through such tormils and pains for more then 20 years, golden years of your life, your family also gone through such bad times, may u have a better health and no sufferings in your life.
See X-Ray Observation of time-reversal symmetry breaking in the band structure of altermagnetic RuO2. X-Ray images (that look like DNA) show the same reverse arrow of time publicly exposed in Sept 2011. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia: Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly - End results "On July 12, 2012 the OPERA collaboration published the end results of their measurements between 2009-2011. The difference between the measured and expected arrival time of neutrinos (compared to the speed of light) was approximately 6.5 ± 15 ns. This is consistent with no difference at all, thus the speed of neutrinos is consistent with the speed of light within the margin of error. Also the re-analysis of the 2011 bunched beam rerun gave a similar result.[9] However one thing remained unanswered by the researchers: the fact that SLAC's E158 asymmetry of the weak force data @ 2.48×10−5 sec in 453.6 miles matched CERN's neutrinos @ (v-c)/c=2.48×10−5 sec creating the needed 0.20×10−5 sec for the asymmetry time added. After this was made known the Department of Energy's SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory confirmed the Time Asymmetry the E158 data revealed after going back and looking at almost 10 years of data from the billions of particle collisions collected in the BaBar Experiment and confirmed the claim of a violation of time reversal symmetry. SLAC reported the discovery on November 13 in the journal Physical Review Letters, stating "the results are impressively robust, with a 1 in 10 tredecillion (1043) or 14-sigma level of certainty - far more than needed to declare a discovery."[25] “This is a fresh way to understand data we had already used to measure CP violation,” said BaBar physics coordinator Abner Soffer, associate professor at Tel Aviv University. “By looking at it slightly differently we were able to undeniably see time violation as well. What’s nice is that the effect was there the whole time, but nobody had thought about it the right way before.” Important Note: It is just as impossible for a particle with mass like the neutrino to travel at the speed of light as it is to exceed the speed of light so something very "impossible" is shown happening here. Someone needs to explain how the greatest scientists on Earth can see well enough to do such amazing experiments and then turn around and use a well known impossibility to disprove another impossibility because it's "impossible". Verification of CERN’s Neutrinos created at the Speed of Light and Confirmation of added spacetime due to asymmetry of the weak force. Sept 24, 2011 “The feeling that most people have is this can't be right, this can't be real,” said James Gillies, a spokesman for the European Organization for Nuclear Research. Note: Credit and thanks goes to the Korg Forum members that helped with UFT research in the thread "Weak force is an oscillator". Open up a calculator and follow along to see how simple it was to show what caused the "impossible measurement" by knowing what ratio (SLAC's E158 ratio) in physics to use... which was actually first observed back in the 40's measuring the photon. This simple undisputed math below posted in 2011 replaces "imaginary time" with real time by adding a reverse arrow to time need to support anything oscillating in space connected to time. Weak Force Asymmetry {a} adds 1hour/3600 seconds every 1000 years/3.6 seconds a year: Re: SLAC E158 ratio CERN Neutrino’s speed past light speed of light in 453.6 miles: @ (v-c)/c = 2.48e-5 Weak Force Asymmetry {a} time added to speed of light traveling 453.6 miles (relative to muon phase timing): 2.48e-5 Resulting asymmetry in time originally called Einstein’s Comma predicted years in advance due to UFT never expecting to be able to prove it with a sigma 14 confirmation that time has asymmetry needed to support the resulting subtrahend adding a 4th oscillation phase to the atom via a reverse arrow connected to time needed to add (and explain/prove) the 0.20e-5 sec asymmetry in time exposed in 2011 below posted worldwide. 3600sec / 1000 years 3.6 sec x 186282 speed of light = {a} time added past speed of light in one year 670615.2 / 365.2425 year = {a} time added past speed of light in one day 1836.082055072999 / 24 hours = {a} time added past speed of light in one hour 76.50341896137498 / 60 minutes = {a} time added past speed of light in one minute 1.275056982689583 / 60 seconds = {a} time added past speed of light in one second 0.021250949711493 / 410.6746031746032 = 186282/453.6 miles {a} percentage of one second gain 5.174644243208279e-5/ 2 {a} forward/back total neutrino oscillation time gained in 453.6 miles 2.58732212160414e-5{a} distance (Subtract 0.10e-5) oscillation time in forward arrow of time in 453.6 miles 2.48e-5 2.58732212160414e-5 {a} distance (Add 0.10e-5) oscillation time in second arrow of space in 453.6 miles 2.68e-5 CERN Neutrinos past Speed of Light (v-c)/c = 2.48e-5 60 Nano seconds or 60 billionths of one second Resulting asymmetry in time responsible for gravity = 0.20e-5 sec (0.10e-5 + 0.10e-5) exposing a true or "initial" inertial frame of reference needed for Mass oscillation (atomic) measurements. The asymmetry in time exposed needed to create gravity is the length of difference (0.20e-5) from forward (shorter 2.48e-5) and rearward (longer 2.68e-5) neutrino oscillation distances in real inertial frame based time. The resulting asymmetry in time is also known as a "harmonic comma" and is an important observation in music theory and a real pain to deal with just as it was in physics before it was discovered. BTW: Now it's a piece of cake as you can't measure the circumference of a circle using a straight line: (e{a})/t=E.
How can the double-strand DNA get inside the nucleus if they do not fit in the nuclear membrane pore? Is that the cause why DNA can not leave the nucleus? Can anyone please answer these questions? I am very curious about.
can i ask you how you was doing your old animation? like this one Post-translational modification | co translational translocation| Signal Recognition Particle SRP
what are their names? and what are their alternatives? because that is really frustrating! These videos are amazing in delivering ideas and concepts and they are made in 2011! My God! Why we can't creat more of them in less time and higher quality and we are in 2024. That seems baffling to me. So please could you tell me the softwares you was using and their modern alternatives? because honestly i wanna make such videos but i don't know how. No tutorials on youtube sadly @@BiotechReview
Well the videos were uploaded in 2011, but we created them back in 2004-2005 and 06 when I was college student. The software was macromedia flash which was older version of adobe flash. I used certain softwares ranging from photoshop to windows movie maker, then earlier versions of adobe premier etc, they available resources that time. I still create, as hobby
