Willkommen! Ich bin Robert Motion Designer und Filmemacher aus München! Auf meinem Kanal produziere ich Videos und Tutorials für Kreative, Filmemacher, Künstler - und die, die es noch werden wollen! Die meisten Videos werden auf Deutsch sein :-) Ich bin bei Adobe als Senior Digital Video Evangelist und Community Advocate tätig und entsprechend werde ich ab 2024 den Schwerpunkt auf Premiere Pro, After Effects und den 3D Tools wie Substance 3D Painter, Substance 3D Stager, Substance 3D Sampler haben. Lasst euch inspirieren und viel Spaß!
Folgt mir auch hier: Instagram: @hranimator Twitter: @hranimator Website: www.hranitzky.com Facebook: facebook.com/HranitzkyDesign
Geiles Video. Frag mich ja wann Andrew Kramer mal wieder was von sich hören lässt. Finde es hart enttäuschend dass der sich einfach aus dem Staub macht und alles in der Luft hängen lässt.
How has the parallax and pen tracking accuracy improved since the previous Cintiq Pro? I see a lot of reviews but nobody talks about this if there is any improvement or not.
So at end wacom is following this shitty politic of capitalism companies. New models dont even have shortcut buttons which for me is mental..Why would the do that beside they want to seell you wacom remote. I had 13hd first generation and that one had shorcuts ,stand etc.. Now we dont have stand and buttons??Please next time sell cintiq without pen too and make us pay it 200euros extra…
yeah not affiliate but a completely sell out review...seriously who ever is interested watch any other review on yt to find out some of the negatives of this line up that may impact your experience
Personally I feel extremely frustrated with the last Wacom citinc pro. For the price I would have been delighted to get a minimalistic tablet, just a thin tablet without all the blabla about the holes, the gadgets, the "shortcuts" weird shape. Aaaa I'm gonna get it because I'm a pro in animation and it's the best but damn I'm frustrated, what is wrong with their designers...
Wacom is begging Apple to eat their lunch. It's so obvious that if Apple wanted to enter this market they would crush Wacom. Apple could produce this product at far cheaper and far better.
The (multi) touch feature is the most important thing to me. I went to their site & the info regarding that was atrocious. I have the original 22" (multi) touch screen version, with the original pen & holder. I adore it, but it's getting on in years & can only go so much in depth with certain pieces (since it only goes to 1980x1080). Don't want to be spending $3K, & there's no (multi) touch feature.
Thank you for this, the info regarding the (multi) touch feature on these displays on Wacoms site was worrisome. I have the original 22" multi-touch gesture screen. I got used to it throughout the years, & adore it. I don't want to be spending $3K, plus tax on a screen that don't have that ability (the 22" with the Wacom 3 pen is the one I'm most curious on). Pretty sure that my Ergotron arm (that I use for my current Wacom) would work on this new screen also.
i jumped off my chair wtf was that intro volume its too loud, talking voice so low then music so loud. is this a horror movie, i just want to learn from the vid not die from heart attack
i've been getting great service from my 16" HD over the last 5 years. any extras to me are really superfluous as are the exorbitant prices. i'd much rather buy a jalopy with that money.
yeah shit is overpriced its the price tag for drawing on a screen that doesn't suck ass, but people saying the alternatives are "just as good"? no lol, wacom charges this because the competition still hasn't caught up. Wacom pen is still the best drawing to date the competitors suffer with colour accuracy, parallax issues, weird driver quirks , still refuse to give us 120hz and some like xp pen are pumping out fucking 1080p screens and small android tablets. Huion is the only serious competitor, the closest we have gotten is the new kamvas 19, which is more smart buy than this ridiculous wacom 17, and kamvas 27 which is expensive for a 60hz panel.
@@Babarbar i think the newer cintiq pros , specifically 27 and the 22 are better standards. burt yea all the image quality sucks on all these display tablets due to etched glass or shitty resolution. in fact, ur imac is one of the rare glossy monitor which is hard to beatr
I bought the 27 which I use in home/office and <gasp> the 17 for mobile/portable use (kinda big). I also found an amazing solid, small stand. Now that the Wacom macOS drivers are solid (they weren't about 18 months ago), they are worth the price.
it does look like it reflects a lot of light from the environment. I don't like that at all i thought they would improve from the previous models but it looks the same.
Hello, Robert. I'm somewhat of a collector of odd tech and Wacom, very quietly, killed off the Engine shortly after launch. I have been trying to track one down for quite some time. I was wondering, do you still have yours? Did you have to send it back? If you still have it, is there any way I might be able to take it off your hands?
I hope Apple bring out a touch screen iMac / monitor to offer some serious competition to Wacom, maybe then they will stop charging such exorbitant prices
@@Babarbar A 27" Wacom monitor with no computer costs £3749.99 including stand - that's a touchscreen monitor and pen, no computer - I think apple could produce a touchscreen 27" iMac for that price and you'd get a computer in it!
Hi! Thank you so much for this awesome video; at 2:00, once you installed the wacom cintiq, you cannot use a regular mouse? Someone said two different drives installation one one computer make some errors.
How did you feel about the pixel density between the 22 and 27? Being so close while drawing I worry that the 27 may not feel as nice to use as the 22 with its slightly reduced clarity.
There is really no right or wrong when it comes to this. The density is indeed higher with the 22 and the footprint is nice too with a good balance of physical size to available pixel workspace/size. Even more density with the 17 but that one is too small for my workflow.
Cables out of date, clunky. Drag delay on pen is awful and districting, resolution terrible. Also no way of removing the tool at end of nib on screen. Save your money. Product is out of date.
Remember the good ol days when it came with a stand and was vesa mount compatible. Now its almost like Nike selling sneakers with laces being an additional purchase. Next, the pen will be additional with a standard pen without pressure coming with the cintiq. Still overpriced and now others have entered the market and are very good. I have an XP-Pen Artist 24, its great and became my primary screen just for the attached stand and the buttons on the screen. Thats all it takes, a good User experience. Now I have a cintiq and a flex arm in the closet.
Do not buy this! I am using Cintiq pro 24 , up to 12-14 hours daily. I bought a stand for home and some moths later I got a Flex arm at job ... The Flex arm is better in any way one can possible imagine. Yes it has a bit of movement but is minuscule and only if you really push the screen extremely hard!!!!!! Instead it has any possible advantage over the stand : _It has limitless adjustment positions , can by used in tight spaces, _is lighter, cheaper, easy to maintain, etc, etc !!! Please don't do the same mistake I did when I bought the stand which is stiff , it has only one !!! vertical adjustment position ( which is ridiculous and totally annoying ), is extremely heavy, it was more expensive .Is virtually impossible to move , because of the ridiculous weight and it require a very sturdy desk. In a nutshell, the stand is a fail product which I unfortunately bought because of all the reviews on youtube ,advising to buy the sturdy one .😡
I really enjoy using all my Wacom. I guess I gonna see you every new cintiq release 😂 which is good. I do enjoy n like your review style n detail provides. Having said that the only thing I would hope for is the non touch version for 22 and/or 27 inches model. The flex arm mount is a nice touch. However if i happen to get one of these new Cintiq pro, i would go for the stand this time as it doesn’t take much space nor bulky n heavy.
I just want to say true, it’s not good video, may be it’s ok thing but after you video I feel I don’t want buy this one, sorry, but I think saying truth it’s more important in field of human production then just like each other for fake popularity, and also you drawings very bad, better you first try to improve you skills and after try to use professional tools, but as I write, after you this product not professional any more, Wacom now-amateur cheap firm for house wife’s . Also I know probably you will delete my comment or not pay attention this not matter, matter true . I really wish to artist best experience and not professionals in this field like woman’s bad for product, so sad, but I think I wait 34 years for good drawing tab and not going wait any more, same as I wait 5 years almost for geotag virtual pen and it also probably going to be not from Wacom, thank you Wacom team, I was try to support you buying you product in time no one trust you, and any way it’s not enough for that you done for me, but any way so long time and writing truth you not make no one good product. Rest in peace
Does someone know where I can find the serialnumber on the Ergo Stand (not on the Package but on the product itself)? Or does it have no serial number?
I would love to see a direct comparison between the XP-Pen Artist Pro 16 (Gen 2) and the Cintiq 16. In terms of sensation when drawing, but mainly in terms of quality and durability. I know that the Cintiq 16 is inferior in terms of technical specifications, but I'm still considering buying it because I still don't know how long this XPPen will last, but I know that Wacom is reliable in this regard.
