Watch easy to understand math proofs and explanations as well as tutorials for many other topics such as online calculators, how bowling works, Skype Trouble shooting and even Engineering topics. Also, I am actively researching into developing #FreeEnergy Technology!
Like, Comment, Favourite and Subscribe to my channel!
Buildings 3-6 were still standing. The fires later that night were censored. No photos or videos. Only one photo exists. seismic reading show giant spikes from 20 miles away. The readings you are talking about was also 21 miles away. Only one person was allowed to talk and report about the seismic activity. Again the reports were all false or censored. dust in mid air was not dust at all. That "dust" was flooring blowing up. 40% of the people in WTC are still missing. Dr. Judy Wood never cover that. Why? She worked for the cover-up.
O, another propaganda and disinfo spreader - Let's quickly educate you… 1. Building 3 (Marriot Hotel): 14 Survivors - It was a 22-story building - 90% of that building completely went away, all the way to ground level and the 10% of it that was still standing (about 3 floors of the stub left standing) is where these 14 people survived. 2. Building 4: 9 stories - 75% of it, also went away - all the way to ground level - Poof gone. There was virtually no rubble on the remnants of a small part that was left of this building and the basements below it was empty… 3. Building 5: 9 stories - Had cylindrical holes in it, 24 feet wide, that went all the way to ground level. Once again, virtually no falling debris ended up on top of this building. 4. Building 6: 8 stories - Had the middle of it scooped out, all the way to ground level as well as 13 cylindrical holes, 24 feet in diameter on the edges and close to the scooped-out centre of the building and all these holes went down to ground level. The centre hole in this building had MINIMAL RUBBLE inside it, it was virtually EMPTY! 5. Building 7: 47 stories or 4 and a half Titanic’s’ stacked on top of one another - Was frothing away the whole day until just the outer skin of the building was left and at 5:20pm SILENTLY fell into its own footprint, it left the seismic reading of just 0.6 on the Richter scale, equal to just 2 stories hitting the ground. 6. The Twin Towers: 16 Survivors (“9/11 surfer” included) - 110 stories, equal to 10 Titanic’s in weight, stacked on top of one another. The survivors heard no loud explosions, no flashes of bright light, no molten steel raining on them, they did not go blind or deaf due to light flashes or explosions, they weren’t hit by falling debris - POOF they are gone into a HUGE DUST cloud. The seismic readings were that of a 20 and 16 story building hitting the ground respectively There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11; 1. Problem solving skills 2. Group Think 3. They just can't handle the implications Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go? The you will KNOW WHAT happened on 9/11 But thank you for trying to play….
I fail to see why vector C is perpendicular to A and B at 11:20. From my perspective it seems like a bunch of random algebra, and all of a sudden C is perpendicular to A and B.
The vector C is defined as being perpendicular since the dot product was zero. The algebra was just to determine the components of C. You can see my earlier video on the dot product to learn more: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1qimuAKpgZU.html
God almighty, Matthew - PLEASE STOP moving the screen around. Just set the screen with the guests and leave it be. I'm getting dizzy. It is soooo disruptive.
I'm glad I stuck with this until you eventually got to the title of the video, I have believed this for some time. Thank you for making these connections. I just wish you had started the video at about 1hr, 25 minutes. I'm grateful to anyone who makes these connections.😊
Bit off topic, I apologise, but regarding your Trump/Jason coincidence video, Dekoding with Kodi channel found a link with this coming Friday the 13th.
- Full video and playlist: ru-vid.com/group/PLai3U8-WIK0F76sIU8xm09oqBTq1mlry3 - HIVE notes: peakd.com/hive-128780/@mes/infinite-sequences-and-series-applications-of-taylor-polynomials - Infinite Sequences and Series: ru-vid.com/group/PLai3U8-WIK0EXHAJ3vRg0T_kKEyPah1Lz - MES Links: mes.fm/links
That Lorenz factor makes my skin crawl. No one can illustrate dimensions 1 or 2 outside of math, and time is the function of thought in the brain doing that math. These may very well be fake concepts derived from pure faith in math, and these are adjusted with that Lorenz factor to CREATE the constant "c". There is not very much evidence that proves c to be a constant beyond using the math and pointing out that it works when you use it. It's changing your numbers to work.
Ok this live what so weird man, I can't help but get that feeling that those other guys on are feds. Very odd tone & cadence? I can't get past the passive aggressive questions & fake support & encouragement. Does anyone know what happened to the missing money ?
1:46:29 hi Matthew! I totally think they purposely throw random numbers & other crap with the hand gestures to F with ppl who are interested in it, and distract from the bigger picture.
1:30:01 1:30:02 this guy I have never seen nor heard of but am I trippin? 1:30:40 is your unit the only unit that no documents show how you came on site? I mean no offense but something seems off, you can hear the genuine interest in MES, 911 planes research & the other guy also come off authentic but the other 2 fed guys gave off a super sus vibe, especially the chris guy was controlling the entire conversation and bringing up so many insignificant points. 2:36:44 Mark pls be safe, this guy Chris is toying with you, seems like he's gasing you up, love bombing yet is also very condescending. He seems to enjoy working on his op. Idk I get such a bad vibe, u know how ppl say you can see & feel someone who who is bad & has mal intentions have an aura that shows their true intentions.
Hey, Mathiew. I always hear you guys talk about how this technology demonstrates or proves that there is such a thing as free energy. I have never seen how you guys go from 'this technology can dustify steel and concrete, etc.' to 'there is free energy out there'. I think it is a possibility, but I also think that it is a leap in logic. But maybe I'm wrong, which is why I'm leaving this comment. In my mind, being able to dustify the buildings is a demonstration of the ability to disintegrate and (possibly) transmute matter. We speculate that it was done with some type of focused electromagnetic weapon, or DEW, and I believe that it is reasonable to speculate that, and I personally believe that to be true (at least I'd give it a high degree of probability), although I can never be sure because I have never seen the weapon or how it works and the physics involved. My point being here that it could be something to do with some technology we are not aware of, for example it could have to do with some type of new gravitron they've uncovered that lets them manipulate matter and it would be more of a gravitational weapon than an energy weapon. All this is to say that we are speculating and we don't know the extent of the technology they are using and to say: why does it imply that 'free energy' exists? Why can't it be that they need a relatively large power source to be able to do what they did on 9/11 and that this technology can ONLY be used to disrupt and 'destroy' the crystalline structures (or atomic structure) of whatever is being targeted while drawing on a pretty big power source? What do we know about this technology to suggest that 'free energy' exists? Maybe I just don't know what you guys mean by 'free energy'. My understanding of it is the idea to be able to 'tap into' some type of energy field that is all around us, and that it is virutally 'free'. That we can just tap into it and draw more energy than we have input into the system. When I think about this, I think it's plausible, but how does the disintegration of the buildings point to this? I really don't see it. There have to be many assumptions under the hood. There just has to be. You can't just go from 'these weapons can disintegrate matter how we saw in 9/11' to 'this technology demonstrates free energy'. What are these assumptions? Maybe you guys mean that because we see effects at the 'atomic' level, it means they can maniuplate the atom whichever way they want, therefore they are able to tap into the nuclear force according to E=mc^2. Maybe that's what you mean? In this case, I would have the same question. Why do we assume that this technology enables us to gather the energy 'contained' inside of an atom? Why can't the technology just be 'efficiently' used to destroy atomic structures but in order to 'tap into' the E of E=mc^2 inside the atom you require a higher input of E? I don't know if you guys have looked into it, but nuclear weapons seem to be a hoax, a full on psyop, making me believe that this idea that we can tap into the E inside the 'nuclear force' of the atoms might be nonsense. I don't even believe the current mainstream understanding of physics is correct, so I'm open to the idea of the ether and 'free energy' and such. But I just don't get why you guys make this leap. Could you explain it to me like I'm five?
Thanks for asking. When we state "free" we refer to it not costing any money, similar to how air is free. The exact mechanics is still questionable, but a lot of the effects resemble the Hutchison Effect, which involved low input energy to produce amazing effects. ru-vid.com/group/PLai3U8-WIK0GlfVj5AYNtbF688pr8fk9X By any conventional means, turning entire skyscrapers into dust would likely be in the same bulk park as the entire world's energy production.
- Full video and playlist: ru-vid.com/group/PLai3U8-WIK0F76sIU8xm09oqBTq1mlry3 - HIVE notes: peakd.com/hive-128780/@mes/infinite-sequences-and-series-applications-of-taylor-polynomials - Infinite Sequences and Series: ru-vid.com/group/PLai3U8-WIK0EXHAJ3vRg0T_kKEyPah1Lz - MES Links: mes.fm/links
It's interesting when you view videos and read the comments by those who oppose what Judy Wood is saying. There's a video on RU-vid titled "Dr Greg Jenkins destroys Judy Wood" where pretty much every comment piles in on her. It is weird that unless you either accept the official story or the explosives used version (the favourite of the 'truth movement'), you're seemingly not welcome by either camp. Indeed - those commenting in the video just mentioned accuse Judy Wood of being the 'plant' to detract credibility from anyone who does question the official narrative. As for me - I'm not qualified to say whether she's right or wrong but find what she has to say fascinating. It certainly does appear - to my eyes at least - that the towers did indeed turn to dust long before they hit the ground. People of course can then accuse me of being gullible/seeing what I want to see etc, etc but I'm open to alternative credible explanations as to how that happened. What she is saying seems to make more sense (to me) than explosives - if for no other reason than how on earth did they rig 3 buildings without any of the thousands of workers ever noticing, which presumably would've taken months to do if trying to be covert about it??
Thanks for the reply. The reason for the muddle up from disinfo agents like Greg Jenkins, is just that, muddle from the obvious evidence of the towers turning to dust mid-air. Jenkins can be seen doing the duping delight tell for lying too: t.me/meslinks/24621
I'd (Mark Conlon) like to thank the others guests, it was great to meet and connect with you all. Thanks to Mat (MES) for hosting the live stream. Also, I'd to thank all those people who took part in the live chat comments section. It was very lively which is great to see the interest still in this subject area.
It's a long show and I am enjoying to hear up to a quarter in so far. I'll listen to the rest of it soon. Hope all is well and happy pal and keep up the great work, All the best, Paul
When you get to the pentagon listen to Barbara Honneger lecture behind the smoke screen. I know you're dismissive about people like her but i think it's a mistake, to dismiss her and Christopher Bollyn. I listened to the live chat last night.
Super interesting. So glad to hear some talk on the passengers of the rerouted plane juggling. It’s more complicated than I thought it would be. I can see it’s not irrefutable in convincing non believers. I’m still curious to have that piece figured out sometime down the road. You guys are all great men. Taking this important nightmare on is giving me some hope.
Hi my names Rich I'm a longtime 911 truther, follower of you guys love your work and content, would love to be on the show, discuss ideas and theories. If you want to talk further let me know!!
Excellent Research. That thing at in the mirror image looks like an entity...of some sort not of this world. Look into Annunaki and Reptilian connection.
