Hello and welcome to my channel! I am a diecast fanatic who uploads reviews of both normal and exotic diecast cars. I am here to show you all of the beautiful details that diecasts possess.
Frankly, the two models may be superior to CMC in many things, but Auto Art is not bad. What is strange is that there are beautiful cars that were not manufactured by the two companies, such as American cars, especially muscle cars, and there is an exaggeration in their prices on top of the prices of other companies, whose prices have become constantly rising. Thanks
Looking at the two models of the porche there isnt much difference between the two but to me the dark blue looks the best, with better shut lines around the doors and the interior looks better, looking from the front of the car the dark blue car has better chrome trim around the front window screen.
Hello. In your opinion, how this Otto model compares to GT Spirit ones? Quality wise? I'm considering this and 1:12 version, but on YT vids it does look a tad shoddy in comparison to GT Spirit's and the price tag it's as nice for one's bank account as GT's 😊
Six of one and half a dozen of the other. Great comparison done. I am trying to restore a 1/24 Burago model which has seen better days and this video will be very helpful. Thank you.
AUTOart hands down. Unfortunately, I never knew which one I was looking at without a legend pointing out the brand. Just the hood line on the AUTOart compared to the CMC is enough sell for me. Plus, CMC seems to have an aversion to putting engines in their models.
Me sorprende que ambas piezas al unirlas por mitad como en el video coinciden de manera muy similar, lo que indica que son replicas increíbles al modelo real!
If you took the best of both models and combined them you would have the perfect model. Kyosho has the best enterior. AutoArt more refined detail. Video is easier to watch with the Mute button actuated. Dreadful music.
I hope you didn't make this vid so people can say which is better or complain why this for this price... CMC and Autoart both shine in their own way. You have them on a shelf under a vitrine- display case or in their original box both for their own reason. Its more a question what you like , and not which is or looks best - because their is no answer for this. On a shelf behind glass from a distance for realisme - yes Autoart wins it all day long. To take up close and enjoy the model in the hands (or preferable gloves) then yes I would choose CMC all day long. Those are 2 modelbrands of a high level, and they both can have my respect. The only thing CMC (nothing to do with the autoart version) could have improve is finer-sharper edges around the openings to show less the thickness of the paint comming forward, it makes it a bit to bulky and not refined, same for parts like around front turning signal, to fat and makes light smaller and been squeezed a bit to much in the turn. I have 2 CMC 911 (901) I would love the Autoart to, but to expensive. I would never sell an CMC to buy an Autoart - and those prices rising like crazy, couldn't buy anymore a CMC or an high end (Full opening diecast - mostly millenium best ever) in those last 2 years For prices for what I think they are worth , I would say around 300euro for the autoart and 500euro at max for the CMC. If I hadn't a CMC version, and Im in the shop I want badly an good 901 model and see them both at those prices, I would have a really bad time to decide ;)
CMC has more complete details on both the engine and the trunk, but in everything else, Autoart surpasses it, both in each piece of chrome and in the molding and wheels. We cannot get carried away by the "brand".
@@markamd1 I respect your opinion, but like many, you get carried away by the brand and its pedigree. For collectors who know what we are looking for, the overall detail is important, and the newer the model, the more the technology takes us to those levels of precision. Fact.
