A channel for casual tabletop gamers and hobbyists. It's not perfect, but it's Good'Nuff.
If you play any games that involve miniatures and dice, you've come to the right place. Here you'll find a little bit of everything; painting, playing, and pondering (at least about hobby stuff). I don't think I've met a miniatures game that I didn't like, and I learn about many of them watching RU-vid, so maybe I can pay it forward.
So stick around, browse the channel, and let me know what games you play, what models you paint and collect, and what you're favorite part about tabletop gaming is.
Ah dang, Josh's Boss Mob (aka orkbusters) had a model upgraded with mad doc (which is an upgrade to a model and not a squad upgrade), so those would have gotten a regen roll. Also, they only have 1 heavy flamer mod on one guy. Specialist Orcs can all take flamers, and those puppetswar orkbusters work perfectly for that. And then the quality sets it to 2, and then mods change that. So shaken makes it 3. Also, the destroyer squad with destroyer captain has a total of 15 wounds, and lost 6 when the goblins hit with the rocket pistols (9 inches?), so they didn't need to take a moral test.
Im brand new to tabletop war gaming. So glad I found OPR. I can use the Across the Realms pinup minis I’m collecting 😎 and I don’t have to study a rule book like I’m cramming for finals.
You might consider looking at a place like r/hungryartists. You can usually find cheap commissions there that support smaller artists. You could probably get a commercial piece for less than $300 there. When you consider that against other professional services, say an HVAC technician or a plumber, you might find the prices are competitive and fair.
*In best Emperor Palpatine voice* Good…GOOD, Chris. Let the slapchop FLOW through you. Use your slapchop and your journey to the zenithal will be complete!
Thank you for using clearer dice :) I think your understanding of last stand and morale was right 👍 remember to use the other extra actions sometimes, heavy charge and focus fire would've come in useful this game a few times
You also can't use last stand to charge. You can only go into melee using charge (or heavy charge) actions, and last stand is an action of its own, which means normal movement rules apply and you can't go into melee.
There already was a hero clix Warcraft game that didn’t go far. It was very fun but was difficult to obtain. Think tcg with figures. Annoying. Why do I need 5 of one character….
You technically didn't do a slapchop, but just a zenithal white + speedpaint. For proper slapchop you need a mid-coat of grey in between the depths and the high points, not just white & black. That's why it's usually done with a drybrush. This provides more transition bands of light/dark under the speedpaints, which can be important as some of the speedpaint colors do not show well over the pure black. I think (since it's hard to tell without seeing the mini IRL) that is the reason the light dark browns didn't have the same level of gradients that the green bulbs did. But it still looks as you said "good'nuff" for tabletop and is definitely fast :)
I'll give that a try on some of the other models, but the Zerglings I got are so fragile any drybrush will snap them like a twig. The next three videos are already uploaded, but I'll give it a try on the second and 3 batch of minis that are coming.
I don't think Fitz is a human, he is a 3D printing and painting machine, possible an android or robot, maybe an alien species. But certainly not a mere mortal.
If it's below half it would automatically get destroyed. You are correct that it would automatically fail, but if over half strength it would go back to being shaken.
when working with pewter, using an accelerant like zip kicker with super glue is almost a requirement now. and thats something thats a more recent addition to the hobbying arsenal.
On the one hand, YT needs more OPR content. On the other hand this is a very weak and disappointing set of justifications for why you shouldn't have to change what you want to do, which is use AI art. I'm no one special, you don't need to care about my opinions on this, but since you've indicated you're going to keep using AI I'm going to block your channel.
Reliable says they shoot as if they had Q2, so modifiers are applied after Also some things you did wrong: When the demon prince charged the kill-rig it won combat and so the kill rig would have had to do a shaken test (same as when the chickens charged him) And a very important rule: Units can't stay nor move or charge trough 1" of any other unit, including allies. So you can very effectively move block units with that
I think you are running the Deadly rule incorrectly. It states that all attacks with Deadly need to resolve first. That, and that you need to declare all attacks first and then roll, makes a big difference into mixed units of chaff and a hero. I may be wrong, tho.
@@Good.Nuff.Gaming Your reps are so great, and I am amazed how you can keep commentary, camera, tactics and rules straight and on point almost all the time. :) Always looking forward to the next one.
First video of yours and using AI is inherently anti-artist. These images aren't yours because you can't copyright AI content. Something that is built for profit, which all AI is, it's not for free. You like AI but this defense just proves you are pro-ai, and they aren't good reasons to use AI. You don't need it. AI content is not something you need. Whats wrong with AI? Everything.
@Good.Nuff.Gaming generative ai for use for the public? There is no inherent good that can come from using generated slop. Using the fair use argument as to why corpos can scrap artists work, resell it to the public without any artists receiving royalties is a crime
As an artist I can't help but find these AI tools fascinating, with all that's possible, so long as I don't look at the greater implications. The way I understand it, to build these AI tools a continues supply of high quality data/art is necessary or else they will become dated. I don't really care about the specific interpretation of copyright law so long as artist are necessary there should be some way for them to make a living. If these companies continue as they have I fear the next generation of artists will be expected to develop all the skills of a full time artist in their spare time. If I borrow your comparison to industrialization; it would be like a factory owner not paying their labourers, you the customer may not have done anything wrong but you are complicit in their exploitation. To be honest, I expect that I may be required to do the same soon and I don't know what to think about that.
These people wont understand until it negatively effects them. This guy has enough videos to train a model to talk like him and write video scripts. Someone should come out with goodnuff gaming 2 channel thats all AI generated conent.
Use any tools to do a nice vid and don’t listen to prehistoric thinking people. I remember in the 1980’s when I started using a computer to produce art, a lot of my fellow students considered it was no art at all…
All that work that AI produces has to be trained on other artwork. That artwork was sampled under the false pretense that it was for educational purposes and now those companies are putting out AI generated works based upon the artwork of others and they do not get a penny for it. That is why it is unethical and should not be an industry you support until they pay the artists they sample their due.
So i'll try to put out my thoughts on the matter, hope you'll find them usefull. It's not an easy topic, hence there's no easy answer, but what i can say is that your specific use of AI isn't problematic at all. What's been unethical all along is simply how almost all the models out there came to be. But since you mentioned the way humans also references other artists work all the time, let's analyze that argument first: in my opinion, it's always been somewhat of a hidden consensus amongst artists that canonical referencing "is not a problem". Why that is true, however, is extremely important: 1) scale: humans can only achieve so much! It is also why the way you're using AI in the first place is totally fine. You're using the references to either create your own custom art or for relatively unimportant aspects of everydays life, like thumbnails, which i think they're more embellished titles than piece of artworks anyway. Even if you were to manually copy other's people work 1:1, there's only so much damage that you could do. 2) tactfulness and respect: while not universally true, most artists will iterate upon the references enough so that the result is now distant enough from the work of the original artist and more representative of their own vision. Exactly how you had iterated on the idea of the gold details on the models. It'd be vastly different if you proceeded to copy other people ideas 1:1 in order to sell them and profit off of it. Ai changes both of these. Scale is now a problem of gigantic proportions for the most problematic use of reference images, the 1:1 copying of a specific artist style. There's no tactfulness nor crediting nor the notion to be transformative enough. There's a lot of "use an artist name on a prompt to copy their exact artstyle". Hence the referencing performed at the level that the AI does is now totally in the realm of a commercial usage, which should be rightfully licenseable. This is why artists screams it was a robbery; nobody had the time to protect themselves from big corporations that quietly scraped billions of images in order to profit from them. Funnily enough, nowadays artists have not only developed licences that prohibit the inclusion of their work in any dataset, but also the tools that could taint their new artworks so that it would confuse ai models, thus preventing the continuous innovation from ai. So I wouldn't just bet that AIs will be able to stay innovative. In regard to the video, i would have prefered if you didn't cherrypick examples that clearly favors the AIs: that napoleon goblin logo could have been made by a fiverr artist for 15/20 bucks and better. So in terms of market rates, it was perhaps a relic from the past or a wildly overpriced piece of artwork. The most sensible artists have accepted the fact that AIs are here to stay, but there are those that have been created without permission and those that are, in fact, endorsed by artists, that have paid licenses and are definitely the "ethical" choice. They might not be the best ones out there, but if supreme quality wasn't your first concern, why not only use the ethical ones? It'd be interestesting to see a follow up video where you consider all the comments that you have received so far and if your opinion has faltered a bit.
Satire is entirely built on taking existing content and tweaking it just a bit. Weird Al has sold millions of records doing it. MAD magazine has been doing it for decades, SNL does it on stage, but no complaints. Comedy gets a pass?
@@Good.Nuff.Gaming regardless your analogy was bad. It's not like the industrial revolution. It's like your students turning in AI essays. The "machine learning" sources other essays to do it and then just rearranges the words to make something "new." It's plagiarism. I'm not even oppose to anyone using AI for there thumbnails. Aint no one got time or money for that and I have the skill. BTW I would have sold that goblin only better including the original art and all rights for 50 bucks plus shipping.
All of these gripes with AI art are the same with AI programing. But just like in AI art the programing is low level but quickly produced. You cant spit out an entire Unity game using just ChatGPT. But you can create a Linux Ansible script for installing yum packages to a server. The minor work is what is going by the way side. The side gigs, the junior developers, the Fiver culture. But large scale task like a video game, graphic novels, SQL server databases, etc. are still gonna need large teams and many hours of dedication. We are gonna see small projects done overnight and larger projects done 30% quicker. honestly I see every profession using AI in tandem with their own skills. when AI can get you 30% of the way off the bat and take out all of the configuration steps (back end coding, concept art, balancing mechanics, etc.) That leaves so much room for the fine detail work. the thing that indie developers, solo artist, and more have very little time to do. The best thing to do is figure out how AI can speed up your process and how you can build off of the AI. I have already seen great works of art and indie games that are a mix of raw human talent and AI. I have seen Twine UI that was magnificent and when I dug through the CSS code some of it was cited for a human user and some of it still had GPT prompts attached. The answer is definitely somewhere in the middle.
