Cricket news and analysis for you, the cricket fan, brought to you by Jamie Alter, a cricket journalist and analyst since 2005 having covered the sport for ESPNcricinfo, Cricbuzz, The Times of India, Network 18's Cricketnext, Cricket Country, Zee Sports and more media outlets.
Yes, India needs to be careful and cautious... Flight mein speaker par video dekhne walo par aapke reaction ka intezaar kar rahe hain aapke main channel k subscribers 😉
Bangladesh playing XI for the first test would be : 1. Joy/Zakir 2. Sadman 3. Mominul 4. Shanto 5. Mushfiq 6. Shakib 7. Liton 8. Miraz 9. Taijul 10. Hasan 11. Nahid Taskin would be rested for the load management.
ACB taking the onus for this mismanagement and BCCI being relieved, this itself shows the coercion & duress that ACB must have been through to address this issue.! ICC should penalise BCCI for being a lax facilitator. 😮
Kl Rahul averages poor in Australia as an opener and not at number 5! which is where he’ll be crucial and may provide the much needed experience later this year. Rohit’s averages 31 and 16 in Australia and South After respectively whereas Kl Rahul Avgs 20 and 28 respectively. I don’t see much difference. Both were on par in England in 2021. Why the bias sir?
Precisely my point, that when it comes to KL Rahul, after 50 Tests, we are still using terms like "may provide". There is no bias. It is pure fact. He is an under-performer at Test level, averaging 34 from 50 Tests. I would prefer more options for No 3 and No 5. Sadly in India we keep going back to the same tried and tested players instead of trying new faces.
Jamie bro..kal se bhikaristani journalist social media pr chala rhe ki kya fayda itne rich board ka jo ground me facility nhi kra sakte...unko ye sach nhi pata ya wo jaan bojh ke kr rhe ye sab
Only batsman to score 100 In South Africa and second highest average among Indian batters against South Africa and he played only one test match against England series where he was the highest scorer. And still you have the audacity to question his place in the team? Just to garner a few more lines. Really bad
"Audacity?" No, its calling a spade a spade and asking questions which need to be asked. Rahul averages 20 in Australia. 28 in South Africa. 34 in England. After 50 Tests, his overall average is 34. If you are okay with these very ordinary numbers, that's fine. I think its time to try someone new this time and see what the future looks like.
@@CricketwithJamie have you compared last two years of all the batsman numbers in Aus, Eng, SA and NZ. Please do so, you will realise what rubbish you are talking about.
Yup. Here are the averages for SENA countries. Pant 55.57 Jadeja 45.50 Jaiswal 45.14 Kohli 44.57 Rohit 44.75 Rahul 37.66 Rahane 28.20 Pujara 24.40 Gill 17.10 Still feel for No 3 and No 5, India need to find someone else.
@@sudheerputtur1736 you yourself asked for SENA stats in your previous comment and now you’re changing that parameter? 🤣 Bhai rehne do tum. Please try your agenda somewhere else. Good luck.
Ek over mein 5 sixes dene waale bowler Yash Dayal ko kaise India ki team mein select kar liya gaya ? What has he achieved in first class cricket to merit selection ?
kl will definitely play in Australia if fit so he will be played to maintain consistency in playing 11...if he doesn't perform in Bangladesh series than u might think of bringing in sarfaraz
@@CricketwithJamie based on perception that the team has... KL has hundreds in South Africa, England and even a hundred in Australia...sarfaraz is yet to play an overseas test.. It's not a plain yes or no... Everybody has a different opinion....We always rely on the past performances... There is a popular notion in Indian cricket that rahul is a compact player thus useful in overseas conditions...statistically you have a point but what's the point of having selectors then.. A computer is good enough to select the national team
@@sauravkumardubey8349 and at one point in time KL Rahul would have been compared to another experienced player when he hadn’t played in such and such country. And countless before him. I’d take the potential of Sarfaraz over the inadequacy of KL Rahul after 50 something Tests.
@@CricketwithJamie that's what I said... Eventually it's about opinions.. I feel KL has the merit to perform especially down under... And i have reservations regarding sarfaraz playing quality pace in bouncy conditions. He didn't look at ease against mark wood at home.. So let's hold our horses
Rutu isn’t even a BACKUP opener/1 down/2 down What a waste of talent. Its really sad to see how much potential of RUTU is being wasted here After Virat, Rahul the most class batsman i saw is RUTU
Hatshit rana is tall, high arm action. Bowl 140-145. Good domestic record. Can bat a bit still no one said about him. This is india. Kohli sastri ko chahie. Ek nam bumrah ko pata hain.
Mukesh is overrated. He was jocker in eng series. People has short memory. Akashdeep is country mile better than mukesh. Harshit and akashdeep now better than siraj ( he bowling at 130).
😂 Jaime bro looking like a perfect Britishers before 1947 great look and i support Team A to win because Gill is my favourite also want Kishan to have good season for his comeback this is gonna be interesting giving me bit vibes of IPL but it's test format which is even better than T20I
