Quantum Gravity Research is a Los Angeles based organization of scientists working on developing a first-principles quantum gravity unification theory while supporting the global physics community at large through collaborative research. The group’s core focus, Emergence Theory, is being developed by a team of dedicated physicists and mathematicians using E8-derived quasicrystal mathematics to weave together quantum mechanics, general and special relativity, the standard model and other mainstream physics theories into a complete, fundamental picture of a discretized, self-actualizing universe.
The group was founded in 2009 by Klee Irwin and currently has over 20 scientists world-wide working on Emergence Theory.
Please consider supporting our mission with as little as $1/month: quantumgravityresearch.givingcircles.io
QGR WEBSITE: www.quantumgravityresearch.org
PEER-REVIEWED RESEARCH PAPERS & PRESENTATIONS: www.quantumgravityresearch.org/publications
I mean even without going far out, talking objectively about what we know about reality requires us to face the biocentric nature of the language we use to talk about reality. We cannot seperate information from conciousness because we are conscious, and any information we know is information that can be proccessed by a conscious being.
i guess as long some scientists believe a "planet" is a massive object , we will fail to find the correct connections - the biggest planet will have the size of our sun maybe even biggier but their mass and density ist much lower therefore also the gravtational impact is "homeopathic" comparered to a black hole or the biggest stars
So imagine sitting in the movie theatre the father is the light/information source the mother is the lense and our dimension and reality is what’s on the screen
@hippo-potamus @hippo-potamus Mathmatics proves predictions of the nature of empirical evidence. By your definition, everything in science is "magic fairydust".
For your understanding (took a module on quantum computing at uni): You can have two (or more) qubits, (quantum bits) which are entangled. This means that measuring the state of one qubit will immediately cause the other qubit's state to also change. For example if qubit A was entangled with qubit B, and qubit A was measured to be in state 0 (possible states being 0 or 1), then if you measure qubit B, it will also be in state 0. This is one form of entanglement. The interesting part is that before you measured qubit A, both qubits were in a state between 0 and 1, and the act of measuring them causes them to collapse into one of these two states, and changes the state of both qubits. This means that if qubit A and qubit B are light years apart, but you measure qubit A, it changes the state of qubit B immediately. This suggests that information can travel faster than light. The point he's making is that despite the fact that the change happens immediately, you can't use this to actually communicate any useful information (data) faster than light, because you have no control over the way the qubits collapse. It's a random probability of each occurring, and you can't use this to transfer data faster than light. From your local frame of reference, there's also no difference between qubit A being measured at 0, causing your quit B to also show a 0 when measured, and your qubit B collapsing to a 0. Equally they could have both collapsed to a 1.
And you also do not gain any information from them collapsing from a quantum state: In order to find out a qubit's state you need to measure it, which would have made the superposition collapse in the first place, potentially before the other. So you also can't use a bunch of qubits to measure and therefore send a "collapse morse code" or something like that. You don't gain any information from your qubit going out of superposition.
At 16:44: why do you see information and consciousness (neither being defined) as being linked? Information: mathematically the opposite of randomness (or put another way: stuff with low probability of being random). Consciousness: a) Ability to interpret the mental model of other entities; b) Ability to recognize that one's mental model is similar to others. Example: a) I am conscious that the tiger is watching me (i.e. that the tiger is conscious of my presence); b) the tools the tiger uses to be conscious of my presence are similar to the tools I use to be conscious of the world around me. (That definition of consciousness has the wonderful benefit that "being conscious" is a clear advantage for survival of a species, so it would make sens that animals evolve it in the framework of the theories of evolution)
I find this video relatively heavy on "magic talk". A lot of nice, expensive special effects, but in terms of actual insights? Checkout the Theory of Incomplete Measurements for the opposite approach, a theory that is simple, effective, and delivers an actual, verifiable unification of QM and GTR. One new relativity principle: "We should be able to have physicists agree irrespective of the instruments they use" encompasses the special principle of relativity (physicists agreeing irrespective of their relative speed) or the general one (physicists agreeing irrespective of their relative state of motion, including accelerated). One observation: Physics is about measurements, not mathematics, and our measurements are all discrete. This leads to an all-discrete theory of physics, without a space-time background, and where we can work both with the 1905 and 1961 definitions of the meter (or more fuzzy distance measurements like "a two hours walk") without physical contradictions.
I hear ya, But is there any good news , that is all we have heard, The Sky is falling , nobody wants to see people Die, or people homeless, or Starving, just every once in awhile can you come up with solutions that people can get behind, and be proud of ✌️✅
I AM ONE HUMAN BEING. WHY AM I NOT BEING REMOVED FROM HAVING HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS AND WAR CRIMES INFLICTED ON MY EVERY MOMENT OF LIFE?!?! MY NAME IS RONALD AARON LOPEZ.
🙂💀? What is the botanically (plantificacious) intended purpose of a piggy plant smear campaign against me and by me, I am referring to myself as I am the only person that I know or can be and my name is Ronald Aaron Lopez. I am also not typing in cap locks at the moment. // response to self as if from unknown person or people that have no access to my immediate presence: So where are you located? // A homeless shelter located at 1355 New York Avenue NE Washington DC 20002 and I try to stay indoors as much as possible because of disgusting terrorists that are far worse in here but at least the GPS doesn't indicate misinformation or that I am at locations nearby that I am not located at as often.
My buddy in christ, WHAT is you on??? Why do you say these things, and better question, if so, WHY would you choose the comment section on this specific video??? I got more questions btw but let's start with them 🤣
Of course both 8D and 4D at this point are entirely theoretical mathematical concepts, with as of yet, no analogs in reality. There are lots of interesting claims for such, but no solid proofs. Whether or not this is an artifact of human capabilities is as of yet to be discovered. One of the largest difficulties to overcome is the fact that humans have evolved to perceive the universe in 3D. That allows the possibility of us being completely surrounded by higher dimensional objects. But they would be invisible to us with our 3 dimensional senses. With all of that having been said I have some questions about Mr. Ascheims statements. The main one is his asssertion that the 4D shadow is composed of golden ratios. Wouldn't that be totally dependent upon the angle of light creating the shadow? As that angle changed, the ratios would also change, with only certain angles producing golden ratios.
The only solid science thing i found here was about the Plank Length. This just solves the "Achilles and tortoise paradox." And the similar paradox that when you shoot an arrow it never reaches its target. And the silly animations, i cringed at times....
