The leading source of all things Texas Longhorns. Orangebloods.com is home to the most active, largest online community of Texas fans, and its staff has created the standard for Longhorns coverage for well over a decade. Part of the Rivals.com Network. Contact anwar@orangebloods.com for partnership information.
Quinn is the smart kid in class who gets excited for exams because he knows all the information and scores a 100 percent and finished the exam in 20 minutes.. arch may pass the same exam but he's taking the intire to finish it. And scores 85 percent
Y'all have shorts term memories clearly forgot how Quinn makes arch his daddy .. smh at you if you think arch is better than Quinn then you shouldn't be allowed to have an opinion
In all fairness you picked an odd show to have this critique. He’s going over HIS list from last year. He prepared all that data for Chad to react to. Just an observation.
None of these 4 know football. They can read a box score and have no context outside of that. Please tell me the little things that they are doing right or wrong not just numbers?
I'm so sick of the Trey Moore discourse. People just looking at the box scores and not watching the games..... He's had at least 3 sacks negated because of holding penalties..
Ketch has gone insane. How is arch not gonna lead you when he has a 68 yard to run? Statistics taught at the HCC woodlands campus, if after seeing this you dibt completely reverse that view its not too late to sign up next semester
Quinn has way more experience in higher profile games than arch does. Arch is fluent and natural but lacks experience nothing wrong with that, just takes time but the future is VERY BRIGHT!🤘🏼
Here’s a hot take: despite all this being obviously true, even if in Quinn is 100%, I think we should start Manning. Valuable experience for Manning can be gained. If we struggle with our backup QB, fine. If Quinn has to step in for some heroics, great. If not, we get to welcome him back here at home. And Georgia would still not sure who is starting.
Texas fans definitely have a bit of recency bias coloring our evaluation. Having two 1st round picks (pre DUI) on the interior d-line doesn't happen very often. We got spoiled for a season. We're back to real life now, and we're comparing it to the dream. It's hard to recognize "good" when you had "ridiculous" for a year.
It’s tied and impossible to compare considering defense and offense mvp of the day is essentially like judging two different sports. There should always and only be a discussion of who was the best on defense and who was the best on offense people need to start treating either side of the ball in these kind of discussions like they are playing a different game. Almost nothing the QB has to worry about is akin to what a stud defensive player has to worry about, different training different instincts and completely opposite sides of the ball comparing the two is mundane boring and pointless
Disagree completely! Arch's ability to throw deep with accuracy and his legs FORCES the defense to back off or get burned bad AND lose momentum quickly. You look at this defensively as if THEY dictate the game
Not a hot take. Clearly Quinn is a better choice in Sarks offense. Manning has almost no experience and you see it with the lack of pre snap motion. Sark is keeping it simple. Sark will unleash the playbook with Quinn against the Sooners defense.
This whole idea of it being the best game ever, or in any kind of similar conversation, is such nonsense. I turned it off after the half, looked again in the third, and then only late in the 3rd did it get interesting. Pure media spin to make up for the fact that it sucked the majority of the game.
After 5 games so far this season, Colin Simmons has 4 sacks. After 14 games last season, Ethan Burke led Texas with 5.5 sacks. I think Simmons will reach that 5.5 number if not exceed it in game number 6 against Oklahoma. "Hook Em"
