Hola a todos. Soy Chileno y soy un amante de la marca Kamaz.Aca en mi País,no se ven camiones de dicha marca y los pocos que quedan están modificados con otros motores o simplemente abandonados en algún taller. Sería formidable y un verdadero Honor terminar mis años de camionero conduciendo un moderno y magnífico Kamaz,aqui en mi País. Un gran saludo a los amantes de los camiones Kamaz.
I appreciate that you tried to liven up the video with background music, but in a POV review, we expect to be closer to the real experience. That includes the sound of the car and the environment. Nice car and journey, though.
Ah-ah-ah! What a mess! I watch a video where a guy initially speaks Russian, then they dub it in English and then I turn on the subtitles with translation to watch it again in Russian! Thus '...developed by two universities from Moscow, in collaboration with KAMAZ...' becomes '...developed by two universities from Moscow, in collaboration with Hamas...'. 1:02
А-а-а-а! Какой сумбур! Я смотрю видео, где чувак изначально говорит на русском, потом делают дубляж на английском и потом я включаю субтитры с переводом, чтобы посмотреть это опять на русском! Таким образом "...разработан двумя университетами из Москвы, в сотрудничестве с КАМАЗом...", превращаются в "... разработан двумя университетами из Москвы, в сотрудничестве с Хамасом...". 1:02
Увек је бољи гусеничар за бездорожије, и гласам за Арктика камион који може и пливати, плус мотор му је унутра па је лакши за поправку ако се поквари у снегу или на киши, гуме неће се бушити и још много разлога има!!
Russia bought a rolls Royce copied it then put their badge. Russia doesn't have creativity or know how to build a rolls Royce so all they did was Chinesed it
It's interesting hearing that Russians are disturbed that the bathroom is a combined unit. In America that's been the standard for motor homes since the 1970s and hasn't changed since.
almost a dream, but without a heat-recovery ventilation unit it is a joke and to be honest the makers of it look really stupid to me now. Like they had no advisors or know nothing about the state of art of buildings technology. Do more networking and collaboration! Ask the experts! This could have been so impressive! Same for the New Russian Arctic station.
Fun fact: the "Bluebird" vehicles are still in use today and are always present at Soyuz landing sites. Go watch any recent video of the landing and recovery of a Soyuz spacecraft and you'll see them. The blue paint really does make them stand out from the terrain. The nitrogen tank is used to flush any remaining propellant from the RCS. Unused RCS fuel is normally dumped during parachute descent but residue can remain in the system after landing. Touching the fuel or breathing the vapour is really not good for humans. Normally the "Bluebirds" operate as a fleet (or should that be 'flock'?) of four vehicles - two ZIL-49061 all-terrain ambulances for the crew and two ZIL-4906 cargo carriers for the capsule plus transportation of recovery equipment. If it proves necessary to go searching for the capsule more vehicles can be sent. If it appears the capsule landed where there is deep snow or in a swamp, ZIL-4906 can carry a ZIL-29061 which can get to places inaccessible to even a "Bluebird". Why are these vehicles still used? Roscosmos has become really good at landing Soyuz spacecraft in the Kazakh steppe but accidents can still happen. A capsule may have to land during bad weather when helicopters cannot fly. It could come down in a swamp, lake, or forest where helicopters cannot land.
