HI there viewers, 'Social Media Science' I taught at a major UK university and my nick name is Prof. I live with my wife Dorothy in a 17thc French watermill. Worked in TV all my life and like to ask questions, solve mysteries and make stuff in the workshop, ride my E-Bike, drive our EV...hope you enjoy this too. See it before it sees you. - interesting science, history, UAP, technology films that you won't see on TV. I like asking questions because I don't know all the answers. My idea is to raise issues and start a debate...if you are an expert, tell us what really happened. I value your views, because, The Truth is Out There. Best wishes, Mr. Simon Holland - Filmmaker If you would like to comment or discuss a film, become a Patreon. Independent of RU-vid...no ads, early access to new films in 4K. www.patreon.com/profsimon if you want to send me something 'interesting' but not classified profsimonfilms@gmail.com Keep it real.
I honestly think there's a subset within the UAP community who really DON'T want disclosure, because then... what do they do? it's the only thing that makes them feel special (I don't mean any malice with that, we all want to feel special in some way).
So what you are saying is that the Europeans have found ET but the Yanks are sticking their head in the sand like a ostrich and are bluffing you all😅😅😂
Hello, Mr. Holland! I don't distrust science but I am angry at the scientific community ín general. There are some scientists in the know (like Puthoff, Davis, Nolan etc.) with IC connections. There are some who do the digging from outside (like Knuth, Villarroel). But most of the scientists are too lazy or judgemental or ignorant to even look at the data. They don't do what they are supposed to. And for this I have some resentment and anger in me towards them. Because as a UFO researcher, I like to back up my claims with proof and sources. Referencing channels and podcasts is not very scientific tbh. Where are the scientific publications and academic papers on the investigations of sightings and abductions? The lack of these adds to the stigmatized nature of the topic and it makes me frustrated.
I haven't detected any mention of radio telescopes in my media feeds. Perhaps Simon Holland is on a different planet to myself. Or certainly a different reality. I mean, I'm quite OK with the people using radio telescopes to spy on the universe, but I don't see why I particularly have to talk about it or listen to a bunch of no nothing nitwits talking down to me like I'm a complete moron on the subject.
In Australia this happens quite extensively with the same exact parts removed as well so definitely not unique to North America. There are 3 theories to this. 1. Experimental: Aliens might be conducting biological experiments on cattle as a way to study Earth's ecosystem or compare mammalian physiology to their own biology. Cattle could serve as a representative sample of terrestrial life due to their large size and prevalence, allowing extraterrestrials to understand DNA structures, cellular biology, and reproductive functions. By harvesting specific organs and tissues, aliens could be testing biological compatibility, genetic mapping, or even researching the impact of Earth's atmosphere on living organisms as part of a broader scientific mission. 2. Utility: From a utilitarian perspective, aliens might be interested in specific biological materials found in cattle for technological or medical purposes. Certain proteins, enzymes, or other biological components from the animals could hold unique properties useful for extraterrestrial technologies. Cattle blood, organs, or reproductive tissue could be used as raw materials for developing advanced medicines, regenerative technologies, or even fueling biological machines that rely on organic material for function. 3. Cuisine: In a more speculative but compelling explanation, alien entities could view cattle as a source of exotic cuisine, just as humans consume animals for food. Cattle may possess specific flavors, textures, or nutritional properties that are highly prized or unique to alien physiology. The organs that seem to be selectively removed during mutilations-such as the tongue, eyes, or reproductive organs-might be delicacies or considered particularly nutritious. The precise and surgical nature of the mutilations suggests an advanced method of harvesting, perhaps aligning with their culinary preferences or dietary needs. Out of these 3 theories i steer towards number 2 or 3 more. If Aliens have been visiting us for hundreds if not thousands of years i am sure they would've had ample time to experiment on cattle and understand everything there is to them.
The wheatstone bridge device is the key. Only if you understand the first teleforce device can you understand the wheatstone bridge device. It is a schematic representation as well as the means to tune the teleforce. Most overlook the simplicity. Study the wheatstone Bridge device to understand the teleforce transmitter. Hint: the first perfected teleforce device is not a particle accelerator. The second unproven device Tesla promoted in the 1930's is a particle accelerator. Hint: one must think outside of the box to discover the secrets inside the box. The wheatstone Bridge is the key: study it if you are serious about understanding the teleforce. It is not the key to turn on the teleforce.
I think there are many different types of ufos/uaps and phenomena. Some being our own craft, plasma types, actual alien nuts and bolts crafts and some that are interdimensional.
As I understand it, and apologies for those technically minded, an optical telescope receives light that has travelled from light years away and as such is a snapshot of time. How does this compare to a radio telescope? For instance is this a signal from a past civilisation that’s taken thousands of years to get here? As, such does this potentially mean that the ET technology that produced it has now moved on? What I’m effectively asking is this potentially a civilisation similar to ours in development and has now moved on?
light and radio telescopes both see things at the speed of light... so BLC1 signal is 4 light years away....meaning the signal is 4 years old when it reaches earth. that signal is constant and is there today.
Breakthrough listen should make the data on this find public domain. Otherwise nobody trusts them to not say at the end "Nah never found anything" Same for anybody else doing similar. Lots of people do not trust "science" as it is massaged to fit whatever narrative is the dominant one. Science has never been so contaminated with biases ego and lots of other human conditions as as it is today. Nobody trusts the science communities. Ońe only needs to look at the fields of Archaeology and the humanities to see how bad its become. Even creeping into Physics and its funding chase. As for Ufo / Uap, paranormal, and other things mysterious the science community has been shown over and over it can not be trusted to conduct unbiased investigation. Condon/Bluebook complete jokes. Witnesses ridiculed becauee Science does not explain the seemingly absurdities that happened to them. Scientists that do not sing the narrative having careers and positions destroyed. Science is more a religion these days, getting like the 16th century out there.
Professor Simon, I find it interesting that you put Ashton’s name in a talk about being open and asking questions. Have you ever seen how Ashton responds to anyone or everyone he perceives as a threat, that asks him a clarifying question? Many months ago I reached out to him to offer my knowledge of a real-world video showing orbs spinning around a plane or ship of some sort. I said I have a copy and I’m happy to share it with him if he is interested. I didn’t want to send an unwanted piece of media to him. In his response he went off on me in a ridiculous negative way. I was completely shocked but let it roll off my shoulder and said it was his loss. I then witnessed him doing similar type thing to others on his platforms. I support his work and believe he is onto something but he has lost my respect. Regardless, I wish him luck and hope he finds answers. Even if the people who don’t like us achieve positive results, we still all collectively achieve positive results. I hope one day the ufo community understands this. ☮️
After the CV19 debacle (still ongoing btw) and everything we now know about broken reassurances, why wouldn't anyone in their right mind 'trust the science'? The fact that 'science' is much too often for sale to the highest bidder is just a minor inconvenience, lol.
I see a lot of people who disagree with Ashton, and I see a bunch who think you need to do more to substantiate your claims, but but I’ve never encountered anyone who wants youse to shut up. People disagreeing with you is not the same as ‘they don’t want me to do the research.’ Everyone’s a victim, sheesh.
When I think about Earths distance from the sun Jupiter protecting us from comets and the Moon being just right to keep us stable I really didn't think we were going to find any life out there!
It’s great that the Europeans seem to be breaking away from the secrecy like the US is. I’d like to hear the answers and I think it needs to be scientifically proven to be correct. Keep up the good work, Simon.
No way are we alone in this Universe and not even in this Galaxy. Once we had confirmation that most stars have their own planetary systems, the odds of extra terrestrial life moved to a certainty. The difficult factor is the coincidence of intelligent lifeforms signalling at their point of reaching radio technology, transitting light years of space and reaching us at our current level of technological advancement meaning that a received signal would be from a civilisation perhaps millions or tens of millions, hundreds of millions or billions of Earth years ago meaning they are possibly no longer living on a habitable planet. There are so many variables with alien communications alongside the Fermi Paradox.
Simon you keep doing what you are doing . Believe me there is a heck of a lot of people who really appreciate what you are doing . If this signal does come out as a sign of intelligent life then sir , you are the man who broke the story
We should also consider that the “UFO community sea change” you speak of could very well be multifaceted. It could absolutely be that but it could also be 1. Bots - see Dead Internet theory. 2. Said bots could also be run out of disinformation centres 3. Results of successful decades long disinformation and “poisoning of the well” type stuff and more prosaically it could just be the result of more and more eyes on this. There’s a saying “the emptiest barrels ring the loudest” that is to say that the most vocal people, especially the ones that think they know all the answers, are the stupidest. And slight disclaimer, I don’t claim to know all the answers but yes I am stupid.
Send references, BLC1?, or new candidate designation. We can find the raw data. Data science/Ai student here. You know those viral US ufo maps? Yep, my student project, it's not NASA.
Couldn't we launch a group of smaller radio telescopes in space to make a kilometer or mile wide radio telescope? Or even just a few on opposite sides of the sun in a bigger orbit than earths own orbit, like how we imaged our blackhole using the orbit of earth to get a bigger view. And it sounds like how we did this too. We should have a permanent array of space radio telescopes if its affordable to make so that we dont have to wait most of the year to get the image. If we could build this thing, it would be able to image planets from other stars
Have you looked at any of the exciting papers on Tabby's star? I have set out a detailed model based on an asteroid mining technosignature (Migrator Model) - if you find time, it would be great if you gave the model a look over.
The problem I have is that in a number of podcasts (the vetted one comes to mind) you (Prof Simon) all but said that the confirmation is basically forthcoming (within a year or less I believe you said). So now you are walking that back quite a bit and are saying that these are silly quotes in the newspapers and outlets when they mention that the announcements are almost imminent and forthcoming. I do acknowledge and want to give you credit for getting much more light to shine on this aspect of things, but I also think in the future you need to be very careful about throwing out wild statements that blur the line of known truth vs. conjecture. I also am wondering if this is just the BLC1 signal that you have been referring to. Because if so this was investigated some time ago and the researchers found it was just interference from human made sources - there are many references to this out there.
