This video is a big joke, most of the scenes that are displayed, are not showing anything about the superiority of the SH. Almost all those scenes are just random parts, which show not locked targets ! You try to make believe people things which are not true by doing that. Example, the SH vs Rafale at 4:30, there was no locking at all, the HUD display clearly just passed beside the Rafale. Nothing enough long and precise which could be a real locking. The Rafale really did avoid very well !
You are mistaken, the box in the top left corner that appears indicates trigger down time. That would have been a splash had that gun been armed and loaded. That's exactly how kills are confirmed in training.
American propaganda and the glorification of its planes, typical of Americans and Sukhoi is the best and the winner, Russian planes and avionics are the best in the world
I'm tired of reading stupid comments about which plane is better. I've seen Capt. Arto... maneuver the F-18 Hornet like it had thrust vectoring. Both are great planes.
F-15C A2G capability is less than F-15E-1 (29K lbf engine configured) despite the latter has superior sustained high G at higher altitude and speed. F-15EX has gained a high angle of attack capability with a long-overdue digital flyby wire upgrade.
The su-35 is an outstanding plane and so is the f-18 both are compared well and can do the job, however the su-35 is longer than the f-18 but that doesn't matter both can take each other out the f-18 can take on any plane and come out on top and vice versa it can be taken out just as fast I liked the video
FYI, USAF's new F-15EX has digital-fly-by-wire upgrades with high angle of attack improvements and that's with 9G loading. From Boeing ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KaK_uSeCJgg.html Advance F-15(F-15EX) has high angle of attack upgrades due to digital fly-by-wire upgrades.
It shows Super Hornet's superior minimum turn radius dogfighting handling. F-35A Block 3F difference is 9G and superior acceleration. Super Hornet needs engine upgrades. Land-based F-18C with 9G model for Swiss AF. www.milavia.net/airshows/display-teams/swiss-hornet-display/#img/1 In 2014, the Swiss Air Force (Schweizer Luftwaffe) F/A-18C Hornet solo display is flown by Hauptmann Julien "Teddy" Meister from Fliegerstaffel 17, Payerne. The Swiss Hornets delivered in the 1990s were the first Hornets that could be stressed up to +9g rather than the +7.5g limit, and no longer have the angle-of-attack limiter. The Swiss Hornet Display showcases this with high AoA maneuvers throughout the routine, including a square loop ----- Sources: Jane’s 1996-’97, “F/A-18A/B/C/D 9G Flight Test Program” by Dr. Jennifer Long Patuxent River, Maryland In 1996, McDonnell Douglas up-rated the F/A-18C/D Hornet to pull 9gs in the ‘clean’ configuration (air/air weapons only and centerline drop tank EMPTY). The process involved strengthening the landing gear uplock pawls, wing fold hinges, and fuel tank retaining clips. A few extra hundred pounds of honeycombing was added for additional fatigue life. The first foreign buyer of the 9g F/A-18C/D Hornet was Switzerland. Furthermore, a well conditioned pilot wearing an ATAGS (Advanced Technology Anti-G Suit) is certainly capable of hooning the daylights out of a 9g Hornet! ------ F-18C with 9G model is effectively F-18L. Hornets with AirForce's 9G and Navy's 7.5G models mirrored F-35A Block 3F's 9G and F-35C Block 3F's 7.5G
I'll take a Russian fighter over American any day. Overpriced shit nobody wants to buy....fuck it's 2020 almost and haven't put a human in space in 10 years. If American turds are so great and secretive....how do they always manage to get caught throughout history with pants on the ankles
Russian trolls just don’t get that anytime the Su performs a high bleed maneuver that it loses energy, which is essential in dogfighting if you want to win. No matter what aircraft they have, even an old WWI biplane, they will argue that it’s better than everything else.
american trolls just dont understand that instantly losing your energy is the very exact point of these maneuvers. and your last sentence pretty much sums up this yt channel. hes the type of troll who would take a p51 video flying and a video of su57 being parked in the gate and say "soorry baby. ww2 planes can fly and your felon cant even lift off". the amount of bias is just higher than americas military expenditure
@@f-16viper99 So you’re saying sitting like a dead duck is a good thing? You won’t find one fighter pilot who agrees with that. They all say that the key to survival is maintaining your energy. What Russian trolls don’t seem to understand is it’s a rarity to be in a 1vs1 fight, and it’s often the opposing fighter that they don’t see that gets them.
@@Thetequilashooter1 the point of sudden energy bleed is to make the enemy overshoot. ofc this is a rare situation where it is necessary, but thats one thing merican fanboys dont understand
@@f-16viper99 That’s BS. It’s not even necessary with today’s high off-bore sight weapons for an aircraft to get on the six of its opponent. If you watch any documentaries about air combat every pilot will say the last thing in combat a pilot will want to do is lose energy. It’s why when aircraft’s abilities are measured for tenders you won’t find if they can perform the Cobra or Falling Leaf, but instead they measure the aircraft’s sustained and instant turn rates, it’s ability to recover from a high bleed turn, roll rates, and top-end speed. It’s not like Top Gun where Maverick pulls the air brake and the opponent just flies by. That’s Hollywood, not reality.
@@Thetequilashooter1 no one ever said that its useful for high off bore sight weapons. as i said, its useful in rare situations in todays world where we most likely play bvr. and no its not bs. again, it applies in rare situations. during close engagements, this becomes useful especially if the enemy is on your 6
