In Hindu philosofy the term Maya means the cosmic illusion wherein the material world is perceived as real. This is a cosmic illusion because the material world is just a perceived reality. Two people can live exactly the same life, but one can feel miserable and depressed while the other person might be in ecstatic bliss.
How do you perceive the material world around you? Are you caught up in the rat race? Or are you feeling free and enlightened?
Maya Wisdom is here to help you create magic around you. If you manage your inner world and emotions properly, you will get everything you ever dreamed of.
Please embark with me on a mission to break free from the cosmic illusion that the material world is everything there is. Let us dive deep into the possibilities that lie within us.
We are all born as free enlightened beings. But because of our conditioning, we have lost our freedom. The truth is that life is magical and beautiful.
So to suggest tha infinite versions of ourself actualky exist in other realities is an over simplification. These versions represent potentiality, suspebded reality. charged with creational energy.
Infinite versions of one's self non-exist in a state of suspended reality, much like conceptualized as wave of infinite possibilities in the wave particke duality. All these versions of our self can become reality when interfered by energy from the realm of polariry or duality. A sort of porthole or tunnel self creates and so to speak 'sucks' non reality into polar reality and thus reality is created. Sucks can be translated into tempts too. Forces like 'greed' or volition, as a universal creation forces and (non) existing as a forces outside the laws of physics as we experience in our realm of polariry, play a mayor role in this transition and translates to universal energy in the non physical nor physical form as reality creating catalist.
Budha is not name , BUDHA Means "Awakened man," There are somany budhas around you, but who care, Cause" How u know who is budha until what budha is....😆...
What a crap. You don't need devine intervention because nature somehow have intelligence and laws embedded in itself. Same stupidity as scientific explanation. Smart ass nature. Buddha didn't talk about God because talking about God is unproductive, everybody have some different opinion about it. When you reach enlightenment, you don't need to ask any more. All will be clear to you, because you become one with source.
There is a Westerner, mathematician, and philosopher named Alfred North Whitehead, who, about 100 years ago, wrote several books, articles, etc. putting forth an idea of the "universe" in which the laws of cause and effect permeate everything and that what is called "the Divine" is the sum total of all organized societies (human bodies are societies, trees are societies, cells are societies, etc.) and that each make choices based on the impact of past choices, both individual and collective which leads to event outcomes. All is in relation to everything else and from that sentience arises. The "Divine society" knows all the "possible outcomes" of any decisions but until the sentient being makes that decision, it knows no more than the being in question. Hence, "God" is not omnipotent. Whitehead was trying to outline a cosmology which reconciled the new quantum mechanics with an understanding that goes beyond traditional Western fixed state science. Many criticized Whitehead and subsequent philosophers of his thinking of drifting into Buddhism albeit from a Western lens. More current theologians in both Judaism and Christianity have started to use his tool to examine their own traditions through the window offered by Siddhartha 2500 years ago. They, of course, have their critics, but it is often interesting how deep wisdom can cross cultural barriers and come from unexpected sources.
From the fascinating concept of infinite versions in different realities of one's self, many questions arise. How does your self arise out of the universal self. What makes your self your self in such a way that this self can exist as the very same self in other realities. Assuming that the uniqueness of one's self is formed from out the state of polarity defining our current reality one could expand to assuming that all (infinite) other realities have possibly one common characteristic, namely that they all exist in the realm of polarity, thus sustaining the uniqueness of this one personal self. Thus it can follow that there are no realities outside of polarity, except the realm of the universal self which exists in a non reality. Still the mystery of how a unique self can arise out of the universal self. What energy temorarily transformed a part or frequency of the universal self into the unique self able to exist in all realities given the precondition that polarity is axiomatic. Is this SELFcreating energy accessible in all realities? And how to access it in our current reality ? And if so, would it be of use, and in what way? The multi world hypothesis gives rise to inifinite questions and assumptions but narrowing the questions down to the self in this concept will likely give us valuable insights in the ultimate question in our realm of polarity that awaits an answer. The questuon on WHO WE REALLY ARE. THERE IS A JOB TO BE DONE!
The Universe is created by the Creator, intelligent design. Not an accident where did the elements of universe come from? Allah created nature and sll laws. This Buddhist idea is not tenable.
Let me guess... this video was written and spoken by AI (ChatGPT or what have you)... Repeating over and over again a few empty phrases without any insight...
Americans have been embracing Hinduism in droves for over 100 years. Kamala is a johnny come lately. Trump is the man for declining America. Kamala is not a world class international leader for America. So far Biden and Kamala have created a very divisive society. America under Kamala would be on a perilous journey with the likes of xi threatening America.
Religion itself becomes incomplete without any verbal scientific explanations on it.. Religions becomes significant only when science doesn't have any further analysis of it.
Buddhist is a truly religion, all others are not in my opinion. Buddha was an achieved elighttenment himself, he answered and explained everything about life and the unverse. He knew all about the past, present, and the future. All other religions are based on someone's else opinions and use the word of GOD instead of themselves. Like Christain or Catholic believe in Jesus as the GOD's son, Muhamaed calls himself messenger of GOD, the JEW just believe in GOD's teaching, Hindu believe in GOD as the creator but has so many branches of thought not are not united and none of them can describe how GOD look like or what GOD wants from us. With BUDDHISTISM is totally different, the BUDDHA teach us everything from his knowledge and show you the methods how to ahieve enlightment. He had explained everything about the life and death, the past, present, and the future. He explained about the heaven and hell, and everything that exist in this universe. He explained everything as least somewhat fully in details. No guessing or whatsovver, he taught everything in the open atmsostphere with thoudsands or more of people from all the uninverse including people from the heavens and hell that Jesus, Mohamed, or any religion leaders can do. Did GOD come to rescue Jesus or Mohamed? the anwere is NO. Did Jesus come back to life after his death? the answere is NO. If Jesus come back alive, he should came out to see the people and his disciples. In my Opinion, all other religons are more like an organization of certain belief and are propagandas to attract more people to support its belief. Those religions do not truly solve the end of human's sufferings and to achieve truly happiness. Throughout the human history, both Chistian and Muslim brought the world in more bloody warefares other than peace. Compare to Buddhist which bring more love, peace, and humanity to the world. Big China, Big Indian were countries that had long histories of warfares but when people practice Buddhism, those countries had enjoyed peace and harmony within those countries until the Muslim came over and destroyed great civilized of those countries, then the Western countries came to destroyed those cultures around the world. In my opinion, Buddhist teaching should be taught to all human beings in order for this world to be better, more love, more peace, and people can enjoy longer life.
This is outrageous. Comparing a teaching, which points to the realm of unconditioned, with ideas based on thoughts/ cognitions, emotions etc mind based, limited by conciousness. Full of views. Even first stage of enlightenment transcends the sense based/ limited knowledge, which is not real time, always delayed due to neuronal delay taken to register sense impressions at the cortex from the sense organ to brain, an ego based on illusions/ ego based views, a dead realm really, humsn ignorence. Please do nt even think of such nonsense, where a glimpse of the transcendence happens when all such nonsense is dropped, by the wise with spiritual development.
Kamala is threat to the Hindus. Watch what they did in Bangladesh, India. India is facing more multi front war threats from radical Islamic countries than ever. Kamala is a nightmare to Hinduism.
It is failing to explain how human being created and along with the other living being like plants and animals. And how the same species produces same species . For example human being give birth to same human being and all plant and animal gives birth same animal plant.
Nature, causes and conditions are dependent on a Mind or Consciousness behind it. Nothing exists on its own except Spirit/Consciousness. All things visible and invisible is rooted in the Mind of God. To think a complicated and vast universe can develop out of laws and conditions alone is false. The Laws of nature is endow with pure intelligence or a mind to carry out its purpose. Divine Intelligence is, God is Divine Intelligence acting through the Laws of Nature. Nothing can come into being without a Mind directing it. Stop this nonsense believing the universe can exist without a Creator. I will leave saying this! If you believe laws and conditions created the universe. Then the laws must be intelligent and the Creator???????
i really like your essay. thank you for sharing your wisdom, it matters! I dont agree that its rooted in the mind of God. Although i like your point that everything is dependent on a mind or consciousness behind it. Namaste
This is a very interesting comparison that introduced me to interesting vocabulary in this context but please explain: does individuality and the Jungian version of self have any meaning outside of a social construct? i believe a large portion of my so called individuality is conditioning whether I like it or not and loses its meaning rather quickly when taken out of the context of social interactions. For example, if i was left alone on an entire planet, I wouldn't even care about my appearance. Would the Jungian version of self make sense there? If yes, how?
thank you friend for this food for thought. I agree that a large part is dependent on conditioning. But there is also an authentic self, there must be, but because of conditioning its soooooo hard for most people to come even close to feeling or knowing what that is. Namaste!
It would be great if should could operate on a more enlightened dharmic basis. But, she has to operate within a wide system created by an uncountable number of interlinking streams of cause and effect beyond just her own psyche. And, as the Buddha taught, we are all mired in greed, hatred and delusion. When I look at Hindu and Buddhist countries, they do not seem to be run in some utopian manner. The same issues seem to blight them as countries run on an Abrahamic or secular basis. Maybe, even if only in a small way, she can bring some small measure of a more wise and compassionate approach to governance, for the sake of America and the world? Let’s hope so. 🙏🏻
Your explanations are basically saying that Buddhist and Jung thought on Self are identical in many ways. They take a different standpoint of explanation, but come up with a very similar conclusions, though it may not seem so. Differences that Buddha also extended the sense of self into the understanding of non-self as well As a person with a psychology degree, I certainly respect and admire Jungs insights , but I’m not really sure if he would’ve fully understood the Buddhist thought process Thank you for the video
