""I WOULDN'T GO TO LIGHT ON THE-RESISTANCE WITH THESTICK, ""IT WOULD-BE TOO FEATHER-LITE TO THETOUCH, ""YOU DO NOT WANT THERESISTANCE TOO-LITE, ""THAT IS VERY-RISKY IN THISCASE, ""YOUMUST PAYCLOSE ATTENTION WITH A LITESTICK, ""YOUMIGHT HAVE AN ACCIDENT""!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
man this just solved my issue, I was trying to connect a second monitor to the mother board using the vga port and I was getting a black screen, then I noticed that I wasnt able to even connect my main monitor to the mb, thank you so much!
sure it's possible. You need watercooling. Ive run mine at 370w under cinebench and its been fine. Not for extended times, however. they need to be watercooled and by large custom loops.
So I don’t have the option anywhere to choose Intel platform trusted technology any reason anyone can think of as to why it isn’t showing up for me do am I missing something my trusted computing security device support is enabled but it’s not an option for me edit: posted what I have on my screen in comments
Not a power/heat problem. What you're doing will still cause issues depending on the motherboard default settings and workloads running. The problem is voltage. Intel is redlining these chips to squeeze as much frequency as they can out of them and they degrade faster than whatever internal models/risk calculations predicted likely due to real world variability being higher than anticipated. These things run 1.5V continuously. If you've ever done any sort of overclocking 1.5V for modern process nodes is a) impossible to cool unless you do direct die w/custom loop or run a chiller for cooling b) will degrade within 1 month of operation typically even 1 week will be enough to show signs of degradation Intel had the ability to "win" against AMD's zen 4 and this was how they did it. Running these chips overclocked as far as they'll go (to hit those boost frequencies) out of the box with a very small amount of wiggle room. That wiggle room is how they compensate for crap motherboards and real world variability and the like. Not having validation of the entire chain with such tight margins is recipe for failure. How intel thought that was a good idea is beyond me. Some chips can of course go even higher and will have zero issues within their lifetimes but those are custom tuned, running direct die, and got lucky. Silicon lottery is a thing. It didn't disappear no matter what any company will tell you. Raptorlake i9 chips running minecraft servers in datacenters clock in a 100% defect rate never going above 65c. Minecraft is the perfect example because it's almost completely single threaded thus won't ever hit high power or temps. But it'll hammer those 6ghz cores with 1.5v+ at load 24/7. That's a recipe for degradation. The solution was to drop the max frequency to 5.5-5.7ghz and all of a sudden failure rates go from 100% to sub 5% (not 0% as they're probably still running degraded silicon/not RMA'd). This lower frequency also results in lower voltages which slows degradation. The power limits you're setting do something similar but only at load. TLDR: Intel pushed these chips too hard from factory to compete against AMD and are now paying the price. They did this before with exactly the same results back in the early 2000s when AMD was also competitive.
I hear ya, and I read what they said. We have had zero failures here keeping heat in check like the video above. But, we'll update to the latest BIOS when available for the voltage adjustment. It will certainly cause a noticable drop in performance. Intel needs to get their act together.
Just to mention, an Intel engineer stated point blank that you are allowed to ride 100c on these CPUs, therefore not leaving any performance on the table.
Once Windows 11 is installed, how do you install the drivers? I've downloaded the drivers from the MSI website. Do you just run and install or do you go to Device Manager and point towards the files?
I know this video is old and you might not answer, but when I merge it with the C Drive, will I lose the benefits of the new SSD? Or will it improve it even more due to more GB and such, I have a pre installed 500GB one and just got a new 1TB one for my Acer Nitro 5 Gaming laptop. PS: Acer Nitro 5 has two slots for SSDs, one is always empty for upgrades so is one for ram and such.
The most recent posts talk about a degradation of I/O portion of the CPU, basicly when Intel designed the Raptor Lake they moved the I/O portion of the CPU to another physical position inside the CPU and that part (called Ring or Uncore) is proving to be uncapable of handling the OUT OF THE BOX voltage settings. The mayority of issues are appearing in i9's and the usual maximum vcore for those parts is around 1.52v ish for the single core advertised 5.8-6.0 Ghz.
yes, boost voltage may be the largest culprit. This is at its highest when fewest cores are active as well. There is some talk of oxidation of VIA's but I think if that were the issue it would show itself differently such as some cores losing access to L3.
Yes, get a K cpu and undervolt it or limit its power, might have been better to get a non K cpu or a 14700 without K. amd and intel both are at fault, for the last 2 generations its more power and more heat.
Undervolting in general is a good practice, the K chips usually come with higher clocks than their non K counterparts. I have known people that bought K skus just because the 200 mhz out of the box without intentions of overclock. Thats non of anyone's business. The problem here is that the recent Raptorlake based silicon is failing.
@@dethskullcrusher what i did! lol lmao.. im not having any issues with my 14700K.. and yes its undervolted and by core usage on P/E cores.. no issues and my cinebench score is through the roof my 13700K score was 30083, on the 14700K im hitting 35433, with some tweaking and slight adjustments to my bios i can hit 38000 :) vi
@@AnonCanna That's great news, in fact pro overclockers recommended to undervolt this i7/i9 parts even before the issue even appeared, there's not much performance to gain with OC but lots of thermal headroom and efficiency to regain by undervolting.
