the tickets were between £30-50 for day passes, which gets you centre court and the other smaller courts. really recommend!! luckily i have a friend that lives in amsterdam so i stayed with her, but the hotels around arent too expensive
Zverev has not been found guilty, is being attacked for alleged violence. Violence in any form is wrong, but let's let the judicial system do its job, that is not the job of the media. It is to report news not pander to audiences in order to sell their stories. Jelena Dojic was wrong to use her job as a commentator to ambush Sabalenka on court like that - a very bad move....`the ATP and the WTA should of course have some sort of protocol concerning violence, on the court or off, tennis players today are like rock stars, their behaviour is watched closely by millions of people, children included. Excellent role models are essential.
I don't understand why would him being innocent/guilty have anything to do with him playing tennis. It's his job. If he is indeed found guilty then he will be punished and after that he can play tennis like before. People are not losing their jobs if they are found guilty of something. So I don't really get the question.
Innocent until proven guilty. That’s all that needs to be said. Otherwise we may as well get rid of trials and juries and just send people straight to jail
i get innocent until proven guilty is important, but when proof like the kind sharypova put out exists and it directly ties to some real life events, along with the fact that I generally try to believe the victim in cases like these no matter who is on what side, I still feel a lot of distrust for zverev
no he shouldn't - he already WAS found guilty. that's why he got the fine and why the mother of his child got a restraining order. it's only going to trial bc he's appealing it but the judge had sufficient evidence to find him guilty without a trial. don't get it twisted. after the way he acted in Acapulco he should've been suspended then and especially now.
Doing nothing in the face of DOCUMENTED domestic violence is not acceptable and the ATP has turned a blind eye. I'm disgusted and furthermore people celebrating his recent victory adds to my disgust.
There isn’t anything verified. You can’t just ban somebody from working just because someone says that they shoved them or put their hands on them. That’s just not enough.
@@brendajohnson5525 documentation - material that provides official information or evidence or that serves as a record. verification - the process of establishing the truth, accuracy, or validity of something. Here's my work, however I am more confused, these two terms dont form a line of coherence in the sentence in which you used them. It seems, based on other comments that there is one instance of domestic violence that was successfully prosecuted in a court of law. The second instance was only reported and no charges have been laid. If you were in such a position, and were hypothetically innocent, would you be happy with that kind of baseless trigger-happy justice? I'm happy to educate myself, but I'd like you to do some critical self-reflection.
Clearly the ATP isn’t going to do anything about this problem, so I really hope the court of law will fully unearth the truth and that he faces real consequences
@@nikimohajer4787 by replying to this comment you are engaging 🤡🤡. And zverev was asked about this in a press conference pre Roland garros- to which he said that he had no extra pressure from the court proceedings because he trusts in the German legal system and he know he isn’t guilty. Just saying, he seems pretty sure of his innocence for someone who is apparently a definite domestic abuser. Not saying he’s guilty/innocent, just that both cases are entirely possible
There should be a domestic violence policy (not intelligent enough to say what it should be) because it’s a frankly horrific scenario if Zverev wins RG but is found guilty. I believe in innocent until proven guilty for everyone, and it’s difficult to say for sure if he should be suspended; but I don’t think he should be on the Player’s Council until a scenario where he is found innocent.
Imagine blowing up his career and forcing another extended stint on the sidelines for him to be aquitted. Innocent until proven guilty is an important doctorine, and if we dont have that, society will collapse.
there's a difference between random accusations with limited proof vs pretty serious accusations with very good amounts of proof. look at the attention the football greenwood got because of his girlfriend's accusations - its surprising that this incident hasnt even got 1/10th the attention.
@@dragndorf9 "very good amounts" now thats a quantity. zverez does enough on court to draw enough ire to warrant an ATP banning. but if people start saying he should be banned for allegations alone sets a ridiculous precedent, and it honestly makes me want to cheer him just to spite the feverish witch hunters
and if hes proven innocent how will he regain the oportunity to compete in past tournaments? That is punishment before guilt. Are you really comfortable with that?
I love Bublik and I don’t even like tennis 🎾 He’s such a relatable and charismatic guy, brutally honest sometimes, and his racket smashing skills are unparalleled.
